Political Participation Flashcards

1
Q

What are the different ways that people can engage in the democratic process

A

Electoral participation: Voting in elections or recommendations, standing as a candidate, educating oneself, canvassing and campaigning, organising events and fundraising activities.
Non-electoral participation:
Joining a political party or pressure group, educating oneself (political awareness), writing to an MP, political protest, signing a petition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In what ways has voting in elections changed?

A

Over the last 50 years the turnout in general elections in UK has seen a steady decline. From around 70% turnout in the late 90s the turnout dropped to an all-time low of below 60% in 2001 they have remained around the mid 60s since then.
However in the last three elections there has been a slight increase climbing to 66.1% turnout in the May 2015 election.
Lastly differential turnout has increased, the highest turnout being mostly in conservative constituencies where people are old and rich. In general young people have an increasingly low turnout but in the last election that turnout was above 50% where before it had been below 40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are people becoming increasingly more apathetic and hapathetic when it comes to voting in general elections?

A

Apathy: apathy – people are passive or indifferent about politics which means they don’t bother to vote. This may be a result of political consensus a feeling that they’re not listen to, a feeling that all the same and the political spin put on MPs and candidates.

Hapathy - people don’t engage with politics of it because they are happy with how they are being governed. This could be because they feel that everyone is the same but that all good everyone is a liberal, wealth and stability of the UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why has political participation when it comes to voting in elections changed?

A

A more hapathetic and more apathetic electorate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does it matter that political participation when it comes to voting elections has changed?

A

Yes because differential turnout means that certain parties, in this case the Conservatives, have an unfair advantage. Low turnout also jeopardises the legitimacy of government and that’s the quality and effectiveness of that government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What should be done about low turnout?

A

Encouraging voting to existing elections: Political citizenship education, compulsory voting, votes at 16, digital democracy (eg SMS, web voting, e-petitions), encouraging greater take up a postal voting and persuading people to believe that their vote count for example reform of the electoral system.
There is also an argument that providing opportunities for participation by greater use of direct Democracy will vitalise people to participate politically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In what ways is party membership changed?

A

Political party membership has fallen significantly in the last 50 years now fewer than 1% of the public are members of political parties(in the past it was 3.8%). Despite this statistics since the 2015 election suggest this declining trend me change since the election the Labour Party has grown from around 270,000 members in August 2000 342,000 members in September. This promising figure suggests party membership may be on the rise in the UK, MA in the future reach 3.8% as it was in 1983. In addition smaller parties for example the greens and you kip have been increasing their membership in recent years or conservative and Labour parties have shown dramatic decline. The Conservative party has around 149,800 numbers as of December 2013, the Green party has around 61,000 members as of June 2015 and UKIP party has around 42,000 members as of January 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why has political participation when it comes to party membership changed?

A

People feel more strongly about single issues and join pressure groups instead, party or partisan alignment – the weakening of the ties between the major political parties and the voters (something to do with the class system?), there is a broad consensus between the main political parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Doesn’t matter the party membership has declined?

A

Yes: members of political parties influence and shape party policies. Members fund political parties
No: party membership does not necessarily influence the outcome of the general election. Therefore it is irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What should be done about Low party membership?

A

Political education, politicians should listen more to members, be more inclusive socially representative, politician should avoid spin and blandness, politicians actually believe in something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could be done to improve the U.K.’s Democratic institutions

A
  • Replacing the monarchy with elected head of state
  • introducing an elected second chamber
  • reforming the electoral system
  • increased use of referendums
  • introducing a codified constitution
  • decentralising the political system
  • making constituencies of equal size and ensuring that votes are more of equal value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What could be done to improve democratic participation in the UK

A
Votes at 16
Compulsory voting 
More referendums
Digital democracy 
Public consultations
Easier to vote- move elections to weekend, vote online or by post
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How democratic is the House of Lords? Why?

A

So-so:

Democratic:

  • people from all walks of life - dif non-politician viewpoints
  • anyone can do well in a career and get appointed eg Dame Doreen Lawrence.
  • don’t have to worry about public opinion so they can focus on their job
Undemocratic:
-un-elected and not accountable because they are life peers
-corruption and bribery
-hereditary peers
-
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How democratic is the House of Commons

A

Pretty democratic

Democratic:

  • elected
  • legitimate
  • accountable at elections
  • anyone can stand as candidate in their constituency

Undemocratic:

  • whips - hard to balance the needs of the constituency and the needs of the party.
  • fusion of powers means gov can do what they want
  • politicians want to advance their own careers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How democratic is the monarchy?

A

Not at all because no mechanism for citizens to give their consent but it has wide public support from the public and they don’t really have any political power anyway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How democratic is the government

A

Democratic:

  • made up of majority from elected MPs and legitimacy
  • mandate

Undemocratic:

  • fusion of powers = they have too much power and control over legislation
  • PM is not directly elected
17
Q

How democratic is the constitution?

A

Democratic:

  • house of commons and House of Lords must vote on constitutional reform and therefore the public supports it through their reps
  • evolutionary nature is good

Undemocratic:

  • uncodified - changes too easily - too much power
  • rights are in sufficiently protected
18
Q

How democratic is the EU

A

Some public support, some disapproval.
People vote on their EU reps
But
Lisbon treaty not legitimised through referendum

19
Q

How democratic is the electoral system

A

The 2011 AV referendum showed little public support for change
But
The system is not proportional, small parties are under-represented

20
Q

Assess this method of improving democracy: replacing monarchy with an elected head of state

A

For:

  • increase democratic legitimacy
  • democratically accountable
  • settle political deadlocks
  • increase popular political engagement

Against:

  • destabilises politics?
  • too much power to governing power
  • loss of tradition
21
Q

Assess this method of improving democracy: introducing an elected second chamber

A

For:

  • increase legitimacy
  • check government power

Against:

  • less independent
  • check gov excessively
  • challenge authority of the commons
22
Q

Assess this method of improving democracy: reformation of the electoral system

A

For:

  • fairer, more real choices for the electorate, less wasted votes
  • HoC would be more politically representative
  • increase legitimacy of MPs and government
  • pluralist

Against:

  • proportional representation would remove MP-constituency link
  • multi-party government might ensue - they are weak
  • unpredictable consequences
  • voters might find it difficult to accept a new system
23
Q

Assess this method of improving democracy: increased use of referendums

A

For:

  • increase political awareness
  • purer democracy
  • improve political education
  • increase political participation

Against:

  • voter fatigue
  • issues are too complex
  • tyranny of the majority
  • voters are influenced by emotional and irrational appeals
  • voters may lose respect for representative institutions and politics in general
24
Q

Assess this method of improving democracy: codified constitution

A

For:

  • limit the power of government and PM
  • public awareness of political system
  • public engagement
  • rights and freedoms protected

Against:

  • less flexible
  • loss of tradition
  • too much power in the hands of the unelected judges
25
Q

Assess this method of improving democracy: decentralising the political system

A

For:

  • local and regional government are smaller scale and seen as more democratic
  • gov closer to the people
  • less tight party control over politics
  • strengthen local communities
  • curb power of central government

Against:

  • variable state provision
  • take local gov less seriously
  • tensions between central and decentralised gov might increase
26
Q

What is meant by digital democracy

A

The use of new technologies such as the Internet for political participation. E.g epetitions and Facebook groups.

27
Q

Types of digital democracy

A
E-petitions 
Blogs eg guido Fawkes
Online campaigning eg 38 degrees
Websites eg most MPs and parties have websites
Twitter
Facebook groups
Online voting
28
Q

How will digital democracy increase participation or impact democracy

A

1) knowledge, transparency as press barons (Rupert Murdock) don’t control all info and everything is easily accessible.
2) unity - like-minded people can come together easily eg 38 degrees
3) communication - people can communicate with people in power, gage public opinion
4) ease - e-voting (not in UK) and e-petition

29
Q

Evaluate the use of e-petitions

A

For:

  • participation
  • easy and accessible
  • people set the agenda not gov
  • political parties know what the public think
  • sharing opinions
  • no age restriction - u18

Against:

  • the backbench business committee doesn’t have time to deal with all petitions and there are no guarantees for parliamentary debate even with 100,000 signatures
  • parliament should have other priorities- are e-petitions a distraction?
  • illusion that we have a say?
  • 100,000 is a minority the type of people who sign are often non-representing of everyone
30
Q

Identify three aspects of the participation crisis

A

Low turnout at elections
Fewer members of political parties
Disillusionment with conventional politics

31
Q

Who had it in their manifesto to lower the voting age to 16

A

Labour

32
Q

Explain the arguments in favour of lowering the voting age

A

-align the rights - 16 year
olds can get married and join the army it makes sense
-they can be motivated and educated about voting at school. Get them into the habit of voting at an early age.
-young people aren’t listened to enough in parliament
-Scotland referendum showed 16s will vote
-knowledge and competence are not significantly lower at 16 than 18
-D. Cam has agreed to let 16 years old vote in all future elections of MSPs to the Scottish Parliament so it’s only fair he lets English and Welsh 16 year olds vote for their reps too.

33
Q

Explain the arguments in favour of compulsory voting

A
  • solve the problem of differential turnout
  • parliament would do a better job if more people votes
  • sometimes you have to make people do things even if they don’t want to eg wearing seat belts
  • increased legitimacy
  • may encourage people to engage and educate themselves
34
Q

Arguments against compulsory voting

A
  • reduced quality of vote- you can force people to vote but not to engage - random votes
  • people have a right not to vote- voting is a right not a duty. Freedom of speech.
  • disguising the issue instead of addressing it. Doesn’t make the system more legitimate - they aren’t consenting
  • people angry
  • expensive and difficult to enforce
35
Q

Example of a country that uses compulsory voting

A

Australia