Political Institutions And Their Ability To Dominate Government Decision-Making Flashcards
Introduction
The US government is split into three separate branches the Executive, Legislative and Judicial, this is so not one branch of the Constitution can gain more power than another therefore making the federal system balanced through checks.
- In this essay it will be argued through the Power of Veto, Power of Appointment, Commander-in-Chief and Executive Orders, that the Executive branch can dominate government decision making however it will be argued that this Executive power can successfully be checked by the other two branches of the federal government.
Power of Veto - can dominate
- One way the executive branch can dominate government decision making to an extent is through the Power of Veto.
- This is when the President has power to decline or reject a law put forward by Congress.
- An example of this is Donald Trump vetoed the Yemen War Powers Resolution on the 2nd of May 2019 after it passed the House of Representatives.
Power of Veto - can dominate (analysis)
- Arguably, this shows that the executive branch can dominate government decision making as Donald Trump could reject a Bill passed by Congress therefore the President had overall power.
Power of Veto - cant dominate
- However, the executive branch does not fully dominate government decision making as Congress can override a veto.
- This is when Congress overrides a Presidential veto if a bill is countered and passed by two thirds of representatives of both houses.
- An example of this is when on the 28th of September 2016 Obamas veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was overturned by Congress including a 97-1 vote in the Senate.
Power of Veto - cant dominate - analysis
- Arguably, this shows that the executive branch does not dominate decision making as Congress retains significant power and can infact stop a Presidential veto on key issues such as Terrorism.
Power of Veto - evaluation
In evaluation, it is clear that the executive branch cannot fully dominate government decision making as whilst the President can block a bill passed by Congress, Congress does have the ability to overturn the veto by reaching a majority vote allowing the political system to remain balanced.
Power of Appointment- can dominate
- A second way the executive branch can dominate government decision making to an extent is through the Power of Appointment.
- This is when the president has the ability to nominate members of Senate, Ambassadors and Judges of the Supreme Court.
- An example of this is Donald Trump successfully nominated 3 members of the Senate across his first four year term.
Power of Appointment- can dominate - analysis
- Arguably, this shows the Executive Branch can dominate government decision making as the President can nominate members who are likely to support their decisions to government positions as Donald Trump had the Presidential power to nominate three members to the Senate.
Power of Appointment- cant dominate
- However, the Presidents power of appointment can be checked by Congress
- This is when Congress can approve or block the President’s nominated members to government positions.
- An example of this is Trump controversially nominated Sarah Pitlyk to a U.S. District Court in 2020 so Congress heavily debated this appointment, but it was passed by Congress 51-44.
Power of Appointment- cant dominate - analysis
- Arguably, this shows the Executive branch does not dominate through the Power of Appointment as Congress still must approve their nominations and in the case of Pitlyk Congress did approve.
Power of Appointment - evaluation
- In evaluation, government decision making can be dominated by the Executive Branch through the Power of Appointment but only to an extent. Whilst there is evidence of Presidents having the ability to nominate and elect whoever they wish to the senate, for example Donald Trump elected 3 members to Senate in 2016, there is evidence that Congress do get the final say and approval on these nominees as they can debate on nominees such as Pitlyk to decide if they think they are the right fit.
Commander in chief - can dominate
- A third way the executive branch can dominate government decision making is to an extent through the role of Commander in Chief.
- This is when the President has responsibility for defending the USA as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy and they can order troops overseas.
- An example of this is in January 2020, Donald Trump ordered an airstrike on Iraq killing Colonel Soleimani.
Commander in chief - can dominate - analysis
- Arguably, this shows that the President can dominate decision making too much as they can decide on air and drone strikes without the consent of the Legislature as seen by Donald Trump ordering an air strike.
Commander in chief - can’t dominate
- However, it could be argued that the President is limited as Commander in Chief as their power can be checked by Congress.
- This is when Congress has the power to check the Commander in Chief by limiting the Presidents power to initiate or execute military action abroad.
- An example of this is Congress upheld the War Powers Resolution Bill which called for “the President to terminate use of United States Armed Forces for hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran” according to CNN politics in 2020.
Commander in chief - can’t dominate - analysis
- Arguably, this shows that the Executive Branch does not fully dominate decision making as Congress can counter the role of Commander in Chief as the President must consult with congress and reflect their feelings and cannot declare war without their consent.