POLICY AND SUPPORTING THEORY Flashcards

1
Q

What are Bradshaw’s types of need?

A

Felt- percieved by individual due to e.g. ill health
Expressed- as acted on by individual by e.g. demand for healthcare
Normative- professional judgement of need
Comparative need- based on needs of people with similar attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a consequentialist approach to justice?

A

Justice of system determined by outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is utilitarianism?

A

A key thinker: bentham
Society should maximise utility: greatest good for greatest number

Example of consequentialist approach

+ all people treated equally
- Can benefit majority at expense of minority
-Can increase inequity
- How do we define utility?
- What consequences do we choose?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Pareto efficiency?

A

also referred to as allocative efficiency, occurs when resources are so allocated that it is not possible to make anyone better off without making someone else worse off.
○ Critique: can end up as an argument against taking action which then maintains inequity?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the deontological approach to justice?

A

Key thinker: Kant
Justice is determined by rules arrived at by logical reasoning, not consequences
Key concept is the categorical imperative: commands or moral laws all persons must follow, regardless of their desires or extenuating circumstances.
Underpins human rights

+ Avoids issues with unintended consequences
- Assumes people will follow rules rather than their own wants
- Mill argues you still need to consider consequences to pick the rules
-Doesn’t explain what to do if rules conflict one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Rawls’ approach to justice?

A

Justice as fairness.

Determined by set of rules arrived at from position of veil of ignorance- if you didnt know where in society you sat, how would you want the rules?

Inequalities in outcomes only permissable if:
equality of oppurtunity
Inequality favours welfare of worst off

Critique:
Primacy of liberty
Can’t truly have veil of ignorance
Implementation depends on empirical facts
People may not agree on rules
Assumes rules will be followed
Can’t have equality of oppurtunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is procedural justice?
What are Leventhal et al’s six criteria for a fair process?

A

Use of a fair process to resolve disputes or allocate resources. Underpins NICE’s model for rationing

Leventhal et al 6 criteria for a fair process:
- Consistency
- Neutrality (unbiased)
- Based on accurate info
- Correctible
-Open to all (voice)
- Ethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give examples of rationing at national, local and individual levels

A

National- NICE decisions around funding of treatments
Local- local authority funding of services
Individual- clinician decisions around individual treatments,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the four principles framework? (Beauchamp and Childress)

A

Beneficence- doing good
Non-maleficence- avoiding doing harm
Autonomy- enabling individuals to make an informed choice
Justice- fairness of health and care distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are Daniels and Sabin’s four principles of “accountability for reasonableness” 1997

A

Transparency

Public visibility of ethnical framework/principles/rationale behind priorities.

Relevancy

Priorities should be set based on evidence, reasons and principles that fair-minded parties (including patients and clinicians) agree are relevant under the circumstances.

Appeal

Opportunity to review decisions in light of new evidence/circumstances. Mechanism for challenge and dispute.

Enforcement

Appropriate governance and accountability structures to ensure the above conditions are met.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the case for use of implicit rationing

A

(Coast, 1997):

-Practicality: explicit rationing is impractical because there are no clear criteria on which to base rationing.
-The utility of ignorance: there are emotional consequences of explicit rationing.
-Denial disutility: in explicit rationing, citizens that become involved in the process of denying care to particular groups or individuals may experience disutility (unhappiness/guilt/anxiety/disgust).
-Deprivation disutility: in explicit rationing, particular individuals may experience disutility when they are informed that their care is being rationed.
-Bureaucratic and political effectiveness: the administrative and bureaucratic processes of healthcare provision will run more smoothly in implicit rationing systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the case for explicit rationing

A

(Doyal, 1997):

-While there are no clear criteria on which to base explicit rationing, policy makers can, however, report the ethical principles on which rationing decisions are generally made.
-Implicit rationing will undermine citizens’ moral commitments to democracy.
-Any benefit derived from deception (avoiding denial disutility and deprivation disutility) will be sustained only while people are kept in ignorance.
-If citizens are not informed of the principles guiding rationing, then rationing may be guided by only a few voices.
-Informed democratic feedback can improve effectiveness of health care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an Individual Funding Request?

A

This is National Health Service (NHS) funding for drugs, operations or other care that is not routinely funded by the NHS. Normally this is because they:

are clinically not effective or effectiveness has yet to be determined
are not cost effective in comparison to all the competing demands on NHS funding
have a low clinical priority and offer little health gain
are largely cosmetic in nature.
Clinicians can make an individual funding request for a treatment if

it is a very new treatment or drug and has no commissioning policy available
there are exceptional reasons why the treatment or drug should be available to an individual patient.
A treatment may be funded on an individual basis if

The patient has a set of circumstances that are very different from anyone else meaning they will derive greater benefits from the intervention than others who are in a similar position
AND

There is good evidence to suggest that they would be healthier after the treatment or operation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an Individual Funding Request?

A

This is National Health Service (NHS) funding for drugs, operations or other care that is not routinely funded by the NHS. Normally this is because they:

are clinically not effective or effectiveness has yet to be determined
are not cost effective in comparison to all the competing demands on NHS funding
have a low clinical priority and offer little health gain
are largely cosmetic in nature.
Clinicians can make an individual funding request for a treatment if

it is a very new treatment or drug and has no commissioning policy available
there are exceptional reasons why the treatment or drug should be available to an individual patient.
A treatment may be funded on an individual basis if

The patient has a set of circumstances that are very different from anyone else meaning they will derive greater benefits from the intervention than others who are in a similar position
AND

There is good evidence to suggest that they would be healthier after the treatment or operation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are horizontal and vertical equity?

A

Horizontal equity: same provision for same need- equal access with no barriers

Vertical equity: greater provision for greater need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the ladder of participation (Arnstein, 1969)

A

Ladder of ways in which Personal and Public Involvement (PPI) can be done, ranging from manipulation to citizen control

Citizen control
Delegated power
Partnership
Placation
Consultation
Informing
Education
Manipulation

17
Q

What are some barriers to PPI and how can we overcome these

A

Lack of resources:
-Compensations for loss of earnings, travel
-Use of existing groups

Differential power and status:
- have PPI rep as co-chair
- set clear ground rules
- involve rep in drafting of agenda
- separate meetings with reps to ensure voice known
- provision of training and mentorship
- utilisation of expert patient status

Different levels of knowledge:
- can be considered when selecting rep
- provision of training and mentoring

Attitudes or professionals:
- Ground rules
- Training

Language:
- avoid jargon, outline language guidelines

Trust:
- Building of rapport and personal relationships
- Ensuring openness, integrity honesty

18
Q

What is the freedom of information act 2000? What are some examples of exemptions

A

Duty of public bodies to confirm if information is held and communicate that information

many expemptions apply:
-Cost
-Personal information- data protection exempt
-National security
-If plan is to publish anyway
-If released negatively affects public conduct
-Loads more

19
Q

What are the six forms of power (French and Raven)

A

Resource power- control over resources (and ability to reward)

Positional power- the rights and priviledges that come with a particular role

Coercive power- ability to punish or impose a cost

Personal power- charisma

Expert power- due to acknowledged expertise

Negative power- ability to stop things happening