Police Powers Flashcards
There is usually no legal obligation to give an answer when questioned. List the 5 reasons a person may be required to answer
Particulars of Driver in Accident
Official Secrets Act 1911 S.11
Terroism Act 2000
Comanies Act 1985 (S.431 contempt of court, S.447 criminal offence)
Criminal Justice Act S2 (Serious Fruaud Office)
R v Director ex p Smith 1993; compelled to answer even after charged in relation to SFO
During which case did which judge claim every citizen had a moral or social duty to assist the police?
Lord Parker - Rice v Connolly (1966)
Which Code governs the producer police must follow during interviewing?
Code C
Which paragraph states that interviews must be carried out under caution?
Paragraph 10.1
When must the caution be given?
If the defendants answers or silence are given in evidence fo a court or prosecution
What is the caution and which paragraph can you find it in?
Paragraph 10.5 - “You do not have to say anything but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something you may later rely on in court. Anything you do say will be given in evidence.
What does refusal to answer questions in most cases allow the jury to do, and which act governs this?
Draw inferences as appear proper, under S36 & 37 of CJPOA 1994
Name two points surrounding adverse inference and the right to silence
Silence suggests something to hide
Silence cannot be sole basis for conviction
Name and give an overview of a significant case relating to adverse inference and the right to silence
R v Chandler 1976 - cannot be criticised for exercising a right you have just been told you have
List 3 significant points on the right to silence
Most defendants plead guilty
Common law rules permit mentioning or commenting on silence
Jury may choose to draw inferences regardless of a judges powers
Name and outline the significant study in relation to defendants exercising their right to silence
Professor Michael Zander 1979 - “Investigation of crime”
150 cases studies (286 defendants) from central criminal court
12 relied on right to silence
9 (75%) convicted out of those 12
What were the three significant points in relation to the review of the law?
Abolished in Northern Ireland in 1988
Home Office working group on right to silence 1989 advocated similar approach in E & W
Runciman - Royal Commission on Criminal Justice
What were Runciman’s main points?
Retain right to silence, barring complex fraud
Abolition would increase pressure on innocent
Reccomend defence disclosure
What action did the government take on the review?
Ignored Runciman
S34-37 CJPOA circumscribe right to silence
New power for judge or prosecution to comment
Which two cases found that a conviction based wholly on adverse inferences infridged upon a defendants right to silence?
Murray v UK & Beckles v UK ECHR