Police Interrogation and Miranda Flashcards

1
Q

Two Steps to Determine Credibility of Confessions

A
  1. Was it Voluntary? (Look totality of the Circ.)
  2. Did it satisfy Miranda?!

Potential Factors

  1. Were you deprived of basic bodily needs (food/sleep/length of time)
  2. Use of force or threat of force
  3. Psychological pressure on the subject
  4. Deception usually has to track psychological coercion/pressure. (Court will tolerate a lot of deceptive techniques)
  5. Age level of education, mental condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Brown (black man in MS or something that was tortured)

A

Use of confessions in state court that are obtained by torture/violence are violation of due process clause of the 14th

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fulminante (Mental Coercion)

A

Coercion for the purpose of voluntariness analysis can be accomplished through both physical and mental means. (Fear of violence can be enough).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Spano (Poorly educated immigrant killing the bully case)

A

If a confession is obtained by overbearing the will of the accused, it is involuntary and inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Connelly (Crazy person confesses to murder on the street)

A

A confession can be deemed involuntary only if it is obtained through police coercion (aka. police wrongdoing).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Miranda

A

The prosecution may not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dickerson (Congress tried to overturn Miranda)

A

Miranda is a Constitutional Decision!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Custody in regards to Miranda?

A

Formal arrest or restrain on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest (Determined by totality of the circumstances - would a reasonable person have felt they were under arrest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mathiason (Custody - Dude came to police station voluntarily and was told not under arrest/was allowed to leave) (house burglary case)

A

For a person to be in custody there must be some sort of coercion beyond the police just asking questions or that questioning taking place in a station house.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Beckwith (Custody)

A

Just because you’re the focus of an investigation does not make you “in custody” if you’re interviewing in relation to that investigation (think Dexter - bringing people in for questioning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

JDB (Age & Custody)

A

A child’s age is factored into custody analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Berkemer (Traffic Stops and Custody)

A

Miranda custody exists when a person’s freedom of action is curtailed to a degree associated with formal arrest. Test is not whether they’re under arrest, but how a reasonable person would perceive the situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Innis (Custody - Direct questioning)

A

Miranda safeguards only come into play when a person in custody is subject to express questioning or its functional equivalent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Perkins (undercover officer)

A

Interrogation by an undercover officer is not “interrogation,” so long as the person being questioned in unaware that he or she is dealing with a police officer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elstad (unmiranda, then Miranda)

A

In subsequent confessions - 1 Unmirandized and 2 Mirandized - only the first confession will be suppressed as long as the second confession is voluntary and lacks coercion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Seibert (Missouri Two-Step)

A

When an interrogator uses a deliberate two-step strategy predicated upon violating Miranda during an extended interview, post-warning statements that are related to the substance of pre-warning statements must be excluded absent specific, curative steps.

17
Q

Seibert v. Elstad Test (3 Part Test)

A
  1. Did law enforcement deliberately employ the two-step interrogation strategy to sidestep Miranda
  2. Is the situation more like Elstad or Siebert? Look @ the facts
  3. If it’s more like Seibert were any curative measures taken?
18
Q

Patane (Physical evidence is good to go even if not Mirandized)

A

Physical evidence that is the fruit of a voluntary, non-Mirandized confession is admissible @ trail!