Pol 102 midterm1 Flashcards
pol
McCulloch v. Maryland
The Federal Government has a right to operate a national bank due to the enumerated power to tax and spend; reinforced federal supremacy over states. 联邦政府有权经营一家国家银行由于列举权力税收和支出;加强联邦霸权国家。
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
The Constitution’s Bill of Rights creates a “penumbra” ensuring a right to privacy. 宪法权利法案创建了一个“半影”确保隐私权。
Roe v. Wade (1973)
The right to privacy protects a woman’s right to an abortion until fetal viability. 隐私权保护妇女堕胎的权利,直到胎儿的生存能力。
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
States can regulate abortion so long as it doesn’t create an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion. 州可以规范堕胎,只要它不会创建一个过度的负担一个女人堕胎的权利。
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
Ruled same-sex couples enjoy a right to privacy, reversing a 1986 ruling that allowed states to enforce anti-sodomy laws.裁定同性伴侣享有隐私权,推翻了1986年的一项裁决,允许各州执行州法律。
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
School prayer is unconstitutional; violates Establishment Clause. 学校祷告是违宪。违反条款建立
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
Created “Lemon Test” which was a three-pronged approach determining what government could do regarding the Establishment clause. 1. Laws must have a secular purpose. 2. Laws cannot advance or inhibit religion. 3. Laws must not “excessively entangle” 创建了“柠檬测试”,这是一个三管齐下的方法,确定政府在建立条款方面可以做些什么。 1.法律必须有一个世俗的目的。 2.法律不能推进或抑制宗教。 3.法律不能“过度纠缠”
Sherbert (1963)
Developed two-part test to determine if laws violated free exercise clause.
1. Government cannot impose a significant burden on an individual’s right to exercise their faith. UNLESS there’s a compelling interest.
开发了两部分测试来确定法律是否违反了自由行使条款。
1。政府不能对个人行使其信仰的权利施加重大的负担。除非有引人注目的兴趣。
Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
Overturned Sherbert test, replacing it with a simpler test: Does the law apply equally to EVERYONE?
推翻Sherbert测试,用一个更简单的测试代替它:法律是否同样适用于所有人?
Holt v. Hobbs (2015)
Sherbert test revived.
Schenck v. U.S. (1919)
Speech can be restricted if there’s a clear and present danger
如果存在明显的和目前的危险,言论可以被限制
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Speech can be restricted only if it incites imminent lawless action. 只有当它煽动了迫在眉睫的不法行为时,言论才会受到限制。
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
Government cannot prohibit expression just because it’s disagreeable.
政府不能因为不愉快而禁止表达。
Tinker (1969)
Students have a right to free speech, but it can be restricted if it materially and substantially interferes with the operation of the school.
学生有言论自由的权利,但如果它严重干扰学校的运作,可能会受到限制。
Miller v. California (1973)
i. Obscene speech can be limited if it meets all three criteria:
1. Community standards deem it obscene (appeals to prurient
interests)
2. Offensive sexual content
3. Lacks any value (scientific, artistic, political, artistic)
如果符合所有三个标准,淫秽言语就会受到限制:
1.社区标准认为它是淫秽的(呼吁慷慨的人
利益)
2.性攻击性内容
3.缺乏任何价值(科学,艺术,政治,艺术)
Mapp v. Ohio (1957)
Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court (exclusionary rule) 非法取得的证据在法庭上不能使用(证据排除法则)
Herring v. U.S. (2009)
Evidence obtained illegally CAN be used if investigators were acting in good faith. 可以使用非法获得的证据如果调查人员真诚。
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
Capital case defendants have a right to an attorney 死刑案被告律师的权利
Giden v. Wainwright (1963)
Poor defendants have a right to an attorney if facing felony charges. 如果面临重罪指控,可怜的被告有权获得律师的权利
Missouri v. Frye (2012)
Defendants must have attorneys inform them of plea bargains. 被告必须有律师告诉他们辩诉交易。
West Virginia Board of Ed. v. Barnette (1943)
Bill of Rights exists to defend civil rights and liberties without being subjected to political vendettas. 权利法案的存在是为了保护公民权利和自由不受政治仇杀。
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Incorporated right to bear arms to lower levels of govt. 将武器装备到较低水平的govt。
First Amendment
i. Freedom of R eligion
ii. Freedom of A ssembly
iii. Freedom of P ress
iv. Freedom of P etition
v. Freedom of S peech
Establishment Clause:
Government cannot establish a religion (e.g. Church of
England, the Vatican, Iran, etc. - NOT ALLOWED)
政府不能建立一种宗教(例如教堂)
英格兰,梵蒂冈,伊朗等 - 不允许)
Free Exercise Clause:
Government cannot restrict free exercise of religion
(exceptions above: see SCOTUS cases)
政府不能限制自由行使宗教
(上述例外情况:请参阅SCOTUS案例)
Second Amendment
guns biubiu
Fourth Amendment: do you have a warrant?
Government cannot unlawfully search citizens. See lecture slides and/or
book for a more in-depth explanation of what is lawful and what is not.
政府不能非法搜查公民。 参见演讲幻灯片和/或
本书更深入地解释什么是合法的,哪些不合法。
Fifth Amendment: try me!
Defendants have the right to a grand jury before trial.被告有权在审判前获得大陪审团的权利。
Grand juries 大陪审团
decide which cases go to trial
决定哪些案件进入审判
Double jeopardy
(being tried for the SAME CRIME) is not
allowed(正在为相同的犯罪尝试)不是
允许