PL1035 Social Flashcards

1
Q

A ‘self-schema’ is

A

an internalised cognitive framework or belief system relating to ourselves which inform our perception and attention. They can relate to personality traits, physical characteristics, and interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a renewable resource that will continually support many people provided that everyone shows restraint in ‘harvesting’ the resource

A

replenishable ressource dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A study examining impression-management that evaluates the effectiveness of a certain type of bragging

A

Sezer, Gino & Norton (2018)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A study on temporal comparisons

A

Wilson and Ross (2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A study showing a real-world application of theory on possible selves.

A

Oyserman and Markus (1990)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Classical Study on Self-Discrepancy Theory

A

Higgins et al 1986

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cognitive dissonance as a public communication strategy Fear or morality appeals:

A

Adding dissonant cognitions (or drawing attention to them) to change attitudes and behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Actual, Ideal and Ought Self

A
  • how a person sees the self at the present time * how a person would like to see the self * how a person thinks they ought to be, based on ideals of duty and responsibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Shim, Lee-Won & Park, 2016?

A

people with public self-consciousness make more effort to present themselves positively -> posting pictures having fun or being with friends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Attentional bias

A

previous exposure to stimuli leads to increased identification of similar stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

attribution theory

A

the study of how people explain events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Availability Heuristic

A

making decisions based upon how easy it is to bring something to mind likely judging these outcomes as being more common or frequently occurring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Beamer, Klentz, Diener and Svanum (1979) reported that:

A

children who believed they were alone were less likely to steal sweets when a mirror was placed in front of them. It is an example of how private self-awareness can be primed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

behaviourism

A

Approach based on explaining behaviours in relation to reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bounded Rationality

A

describes the way that humans make decisions that departs from perfect economic rationality, because we’re limited by our thinking capacity, the information that is available to us, and time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consider that there is always a potential dispositional cause and a potential situational cause for any given action. Why does this statement potentially highlight a limitation to the translational value of the Fundamental Attribution Error in the real world?

A

Because it suggests that it is difficult to isolate either the actor’s attributes or environmental factors as the ‘true’ cause of any behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Consider which email employs the gain frame and which employs the loss frame. According to Kahneman & Tversky, which version would make your pre-June ticket purchase more likely?

A

Individuals are loss aversive, and losses loom larger than gains. Paying the late penalty fee (loss = losing money) feels more ‘painful’ to an individual than the corresponding ‘pleasure’ of being awarded an early purchase discount (gain = saving money) of the same monetary value. Individuals may be more responsive to the version b) to avoid this perceived loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Discursive psychology

A

language is viewed as social action, through which people construct their social world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Downward social comparison

A

I am ‘better’ than the other in a specific domain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Dual process model identifies two modes of decision-making (Kahneman, 2003)

A
  • System 1: impulsive, fast, difficult to modify or control (more likely periphiral route to persuasion) * System 2: slow, effortful, guides behaviours through long-term goals and in-depth logic. (central route to persuasion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

ego depletion

A

self-control and willpower are a finite resource that can be used up (controversial to proof)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Experiments testing correspondent inference theory/FAE?

A

Jones & Harris 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Explain Cognitive Dissonance and resolution using the following.Belief: Monogamy is an important feature of my marriage. Problem: I’m having an affair. I don’t like experiencing this nagging and uncomfortable cognitive dissonance. I’m on edge.

A

Changing a belief: changing one or more of the inconsistent cognitions ‘What’s wrong with continuing if no one finds out?’ This can be facilitated by derogating the source of one of the cognitions: ‘Fidelity is a construct of religious indoctrination’. Changing an action: Stop having the affair. Changing the perception of the action: ‘My partner doesn’t understand me, so this was always going to happen’, which can again be facilitated by challenging the original perception of the action. ‘Fidelity is a construct of religious indoctrination and isn’t necessarily an ideal to aspire to. Extramarital activity is not indisputably wrong’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Explain Lavin & Groarkes’ findings (2005)

A

Implementation intentions were not found to be an effective intervention in increasing dental floss behaviour. Results suggest that interventions should target an individual’s attitude and perceptions of control in order to increase dental floss intentions and behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the maxim of cognitive dissonance model?

A

➜ The maxim appears to be: The greater the dissonance, the stronger the attempts to reduce it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

familiarity heuristic

A

people tend to have more favorable opinions of things, people, or places they’ve experienced before as opposed to new ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) findings on cognitive dissonance

A

Those paid less ($1) reported more positive attitudes towards task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) study on cognitive dissonance

A

Completed boring task for 30 minutes Paid $1 or $20 to convince fellow student that task was funControl group not asked to convince anyone later had to rate (task enjoyment, scientific importance and their willingness to participate in similar studies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Findings and Methods of Higgins et al. 1986

A

gathered data on participants’ self-discrepancies had them describe differences between actual/ideal and actual/ought high actual/ideal discrepancy participants = dejection (sad, disappointed)high actual/ought discrepancy participants = agitation low discrepancy no significant changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Four key points from Tversky & Kahneman (1981) on heuristics and biases

A
  1. Preferences change when the same scenario/problem is framed differently2. In a gain frame (lives saved, money gained), people prefer certain options for gains3. In a loss frame (i.e. lives lost, money lost), people prefer risky options for losses4. Loss Aversion: losing something (an amount of money, an item) feels more ‘painful’ to an individual than the equivalent ‘pleasure’ of acquiring the same thing. For example, the degree of pain associated with losing £20 is greater than the degree of pleasure of winning £20. It is a simple, but powerful bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What assumption can we make about Maxine, who feels like being a mother, someone who enjoys football and wine, is connected?

A

Maxine has an interdependent self-construal (and not social identity), which is typical in a collectivist culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Froming, Allen and Jensen (1985) study

A

1st, 2nd and 3rd American graders donated M&M candies to other children: in private or in the presence of an evaluative adult (who watched the child), a nonevaluative adult (present but busy looking at papers), or in front of a mirrorevaluative presence => increased donations among older children (2nd and 3rd graders) less donations made in privatefindings by proposing that older children had learned that the social norm for helping behaviour was valued by adults, and so they complied with this norm in the presence of an adult. public self-awareness was activated in the presence of an attentive adult, and the older children showed more pro-social behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Gaining the benefits of group membership by avoiding costly obligations of membership and by allowing other members to incur those costs

A

free-rider effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Gestalt psychology

A

partly emerged out of the limitations of behaviourism. focuses on a more holistic view as perception is important in determining attitudes and behaviours → Kurt Lewin’s force field analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Glassman & Albarracín (2006) As attitudes are being formed, they correlate more strongly with a future behaviour when:

A

attitudes are accessible (easy to recall) are stable over time People have had direct experience with the attitudes objectPeople frequently report their attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

goods are provided for everyone: for example, public health, national parks, the national road network, public radio and TV. Because public goods are available to all, people are tempted to use them without contributing to their maintenance. This describes what?

A

public goods dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Hindsight bias

A

The tendency for people to see an outcome as inevitable once the actual outcome is known.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

How are stereotypes helpful

A

Making sense of the diversity of thesocial world, reducing self-uncertainty, classifying social roles, power differentials and intergroup conflicts , contributing to positive sense of ingroup identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How are the theory of reasoned action and planned behaviour linked

A

expansion of the reasoned action: if people believe they have control over a behaviour it’s easier to predict it from a measure of attitude; this expansion was needed because it wasn’t a good predictor behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

How can stereotype threat be diminished?

A

Know streotype threat Reduce degree to which identity is tied to performance which could then be used tomake inferences Sever self-esteem from performance Identify strongly with stigmatised group Extensive favourable intergroup contact with anxiety inducing outgrouo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

How did Lavin & Groarke 2005 use the TPB

A

To look at techniques to encourage flossing among young people?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

How do aggression and self-esteem relate?

A

There is no clear causal relationship between low self-esteem and aggressive behaviour, a correlational relationship may exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

How do mood regulation and self-esteem relate to each other?

A

higher levels of self-esteem may show an improved ability to regulate their mood, compared with those with lower self-esteem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

How do people, according to Latané and Darley’s model, decide whether to help?

A

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

How does Festinger 1957 define cognitive dissonance

A

unpleasant state of psychological tension generated when a person has two or more cognitions (bits of information) that are inconsistent or do not fit together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

How does it relate to realistic conflict theory

A

Competetive intergroup behaviour also emerges when goal relations are not interdependent between groups, when the groups are explicitly non-competitive and explicitly cooperative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

How does LaPiere (1934) touring USA with a Chinese couple relate to attitudes and emotions?

A

They visited - 184 hotels/restaurants visited 1 refused service. He contacted them 6 months later to check on changed attitudes?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

How does mortality salience and self-esteem relate to each other?

A

Study participants who have chronically (enduring) high self-esteem, or whose self-esteem is temporarily elevated by an experimental procedure, are less susceptible to the effects of induced mortality salience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

How does narcisim relate to self-esteem?

A

high self-esteem (measured through positive self-reported evaluations) does not equate to a stable sense of self-worth, as measured through implicit association measures -> need for validation to maintain self-concept (Kernis & Paradise 2002) -> might lead to aggression when faced with criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

How does social facilitation occur

A

because others might be doing the same thing as you, the audience –> goverened by physiological, cognitive and attentive factors like anxiety or focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

How might Bem’s self-perception theory offer a better explanation

A

Attitudes may be changed through a self-attributional process when the behaviour falls within a range of personally acceptable conduct. So when someone acts outside of this range of acceptable behaviour cognitive dissonance resolution accont better for attitude change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

How was Schachter & Singer’s study 1962 structured

A

Some participants received adrenaline shot (increase in arousal) Others received placebo (salt solution)Some participants were told that injection would cause these effects, others remained uninformed or misinformed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

How would Freud, LeBon and McDoughall?

A

crowds unlock the unconscious and strip the super-ego that is norm conformative of controlanonzmitz, contangion and suggestibility make us antisocial and violentmost widespread instinctive emotions are the simple primitive ones (e.g. fear, anger) primate sympathy leads to the snowballing also aggregated by depersonalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

How’s the above-average effect a self-serving bias?

A

act of attributing behaviour in a distorted way to either enhance or protect our self-esteem (e.g. taking credit for success but explaining away failures). one inflates their own ability or performance in the above-average effect related to one’s self-esteem and self-image that the self-serving bias is protecting/enhancing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Importance of attitudes

A

cognitive and behavioural effects social norms (reciprocal) which are subject to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Impression management

A

active process of self-presentationpeople take steps to monitor their presentation of self in their interactions with others, so that they appear to others in the best possible light.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Impression-management describes

A

managing your self-presentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

In what ways has research in social psychology suggested that a person’s level of self-esteem influences how they think and act in life? (1)

A

Mood regulation, buffer against the inevitability of death, aggression, narcissism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What is the interaction effect?

A

Different causes may interact with each other to produce changes in a dependent variable (e.g, contact between groups and equality of status between groups interact to predict reductions in prejudice) 💡 f1: contact between groups f2: equality of status between them interaction: f1+f2= outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Katz (1950) on functions and utility of attitudes?

A

high-functionality mechanisms in avoidance and approach of stimuli, protect self-esteem and consequently self-concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

LaPiere (1934) findings ‘Will you accept members of the Chinese Race as guests in your establishment?’

A

118 (92%): no 1 (0.8%): yes 7 (5%): ‘Uncertain, depends on circumstances.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Lewandowski, Nardone and Raines (2010) Findings

A

self-concept clarity bolsters wellbeinglisting times when participants felt their behaviour was consistent with self-concept vs. participants that were assigned to self-concept confusion condition had to do the inversionparticipants in the clearity condition felt bettershows that it is not personality variable -> Nezlek & Plesko 2001 p.58

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Lewis and Brooks-Gunn (1978) Study and Conclusion

A

the development of self-awareness:* placed a spot of rouge on the noses of infants aged 9- 12 months and sat them in front of a mirror* looked at their mirror image with no recognition and no effort to touch the rouge on their own noses. = lack of awareness, self-concept children around 18 months of age who performed the same task made a concerted effort to rub the rouge from their own noses. p.58

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

Loss aversion

A

people have a tendency to want to avoid losses much more than they would desire acquiring equivalent gains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

Manu watches all the “Jaws” movies, in which sharks attack people at sea. Manu decides she will never swim in the sea again, because she worries about the possibility of getting attacked by a shark-> heuristic?

A

availability heuristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

mediation

A

effect of one variable on the outcome works through another interaction of groups -> anxiety about interaction with other groups(intermediate)= prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

meta-cognitive skills

A

skills needed to evaluate oneself and others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Miller (1984) Culture and the development of everyday social explanation what is the key finding?

A

As they grew older, American children were found by Miller (1984) to place increasing reliance upon disposition as an explanation of events observed. Hindu children of India, by contrast, based their explanations more on situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

moderation

A

is part of the interaction effect and means that the effect of a variable on the outcome is changed by a third variable contact between groups * equal structures within groups = prejudice?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

morality salience

A

The awareness of one’s own inevitable death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Multiple role theory

A

Theory asserting that it is beneficial for a person’s health and well being to have multiple self-identities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

Multiple Role Theory

A

self-identifying with different roles (parent, friend, employee)stabalising effect (growth and enjoyment vs. negative emotions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

One study illustrating self-perception theory?

A

Van Gyn, Wenger and Gaul (1990)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Optimism Bias

A

People believing that good things are more likely to happen to them than bad things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

Possible selves (Oyserman, Markus 90)

A

future-oriented components of the self-conceptthe link between the self-concept and a motivation to actimagined selves we could, would like to become, or are scared of becoming. incentive future behaviours and function as criteria against which outcomes are evaluated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

Postmodernism

A

An intentionaI departure from previously dominant approaches of enquiry, emphasizing that apparent realities are only social constructs and are therefore subject to change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

Priming

A

Exposure to stimuli that activate a mental representation of a particular concept, value, goal or object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

Private Self-consciousness

A

Chronic private self-awareness and concern about pnvate aspects of the self.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

Public Self-awareness (Buss 1980)

A

a person becomes aware of the public aspects of the self and how they could be judged by other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Public Self-consciousness

A

Chronic public self-awareness and concern about how one looks and is evaluated by others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

Replication

A

direct/exact: study is repeated as exactly as possible → way to verify the validity of research results or methods BUT: realistically impossible}} conceptual: ability to replicate the results after changing the methods used so that the results can be applied generally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

Representativeness heuristic (Tversky & Kahneman, 1971)

A
  • compare aspects of the individual incident to other mental examples* likelihood of an event depends on the similarity/ representativeness of said event -> stereotype
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

Scarcity heuristics

A

we view things that are scarce or less available to us as inherently more valuable. -> “limited time only”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

Schachter & Singer (1962) empirical research study findings

A

Participants experienced their adrenaline surge differently depending on context. This supports the Schacter and Singer theory as it shows participants drew meaning from ambiguous changes in arousal and used that to construct emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

Schematic’ and ‘aschematic’ mean…

A

particularly important or unimportant to a person’s sense of self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

Schwartz et al. (1991) conducted a compelling research study to show how a certain heuristic influences an individual’s thinking. Participants were asked to recall 6 or 12 times when they had been assertive or unassertive in their lives. What was the study’s conclusion?

A

Attributional processes underpin the availability heuristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

Self-awareness

A

state of being aware of one’s unique characteristics, feelings and behaviours, which develops in early childhood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
88
Q

Self-Concept Clarity (Campbell et. al. 1996)

A

The extent to which self-schemas are clearly and confidently defined, consistent with each other, and stable across time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
89
Q

Self-discrepancy theory

A

people’s awareness of between how they are, how they would like to be and how they think they ought to be (ideal, actual, ought)Higgins, 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
90
Q

Self-perception (Bem, 1972)

A

people may learn about themselves by examining their own thoughts, feelings and behaviours. behaviours are considered most important because they are more objective and easier to observe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
91
Q

Self-presentation (Goffman, 1959)

A

people make concerted efforts to create an impression (usually a good one) of themselves to others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
92
Q

Self-presentation is

A

the way the self is presented to others (usually to a favorable effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
93
Q

self-regulation

A

changing aspects of their behaviour in order for their actual self to become more in line with the ideal or ought self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
94
Q

Self-schemas (Markus 1977)

A

beliefs people hold about themselves, and usually relate to dimensions of the overall ‘self’ (such as considering oneself as sensitive or assertive). =schematic vs aschematic set of self-schemas make up the overall self-concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
95
Q

Sezer, Gino & Norton (2018)

A

asked participants (453) about experience of another person humblebragging (recency, type, prevalence, gender/age)416 brags where typed as either complaint based or humility basedhumblebrags failed because of a lack of sincerity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
96
Q

Social comparison

A

emphasises an individual’s need to compare themselves to other people. through such comparison, people learn information about themselves, and how to perceive themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
97
Q

Social constructionism

A

Approach emphasizing the way social phenomena develop in social contexts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
98
Q

Social dilemma in which cooperation by all benefits all, but competition by all harms all

A

commons dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
99
Q

Social representations

A

Socially shared beliefs or widely shared ideas and values associated with our cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
100
Q

Spurious correlation

A

two variables have no direct connection but it is wrongly inferred they do, due to coincidences or boundary condition. Ex.: narcisism and well-being (moderated by self-esteem)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
101
Q

strength model of self-control

A

self-control cannot be maintained for an unlimited period of time and needs to be replenished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
102
Q

Study on Temporal Comparison

A

Wilson & Ross, 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
103
Q

Study relating FAE and Culture

A

Miller 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
104
Q

Study to Illustrate the Implications of the Availability Bias

A

Schwartz 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
105
Q

Symbolic interactionism

A

investigation of how people create meaning through social interaction and how they construct and represent the self and how they define situations when they are with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
106
Q

Temporal comparison (Albert, 1977)

A

‘me’ compared with either actual past or anticipated future ‘me’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
107
Q

The dunning-kruger effect is a prime example of peoples limited self-knowledge and awareness as it

A

illustrates that in a series of questions people lacking certian skills disproportionatly overestimate themselves and others higher or lower for their competences and performance despite not having any knowledge (lacking meta-cognitive skills) 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
108
Q

The self-concept is

A

the image we have of ourselves, or who we believe we are and consists of our self-schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
109
Q

Trial and error heuristic

A

people use a number of different strategies to solve something until they find what works -> video gaming, driving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
110
Q

True Self

A

Characteristics of the self-concept that are essential for making a person who they are.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
111
Q

Three Gigerenzer (1996) critiques of Tversky & Kahneman (1981)

A

ignored contextual and environmental influece on choiceonly superficial descriptor for and no explanation for cognitive processes that lead to judgement = no true understandingaverage person’s capacity to make judgments is undermined by dismissal of heuristics as unsound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
112
Q

Two studies showing the effects of activating public and private awareness

A

Allen and Jensen 1985 public Scheier and Carver 1977 private

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
113
Q

Two things to consider for Miller (1984)

A

Has society (and culture) changed since the study was conducted? If yes, in what way(s)? Consider the reasons why culture can influence individuals’ attributions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
114
Q

Upward social comparison

A

the other is ‘better’ in a specific domain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
115
Q

Van Gyn, Wenger and Gaul (1990) Methods and Findings

A

two groups of runners: 1. trained on exercise bikes and one didn’thalf of each group had to imagine themselves trainingperformance of the ones that imagined themselves training was betterevidence of possible influence on the self-concept which led to regulation of behaviour

116
Q

Völkerpsychologie

A

the collective mind and how people think about society how their thoughts are informed by their surroundings → no individual mind possible as people in large groups start to act more primitively or antisocially after losing their sense of individuality

117
Q

What and by whom is the Elaboration likelihood model ELM

A

Petty & Cacioppo (1984) Dual process theory of cognitive (thinking) elaboration

118
Q

What are altruism and helping behaviours in contrast to prosocial behaviour

A

Subcategories of prosocial behaviour whereby helping behaviours are acts that intentionally help others and altruistic acts aim to benefit others at the possible detriment of oneself

119
Q

What are attitudes

A

Overall positive or negative evaluation or attitude towards a behaviour

120
Q

What are cognitions

A

thoughts, attitudes, beliefs or states of awareness of behaviour.

121
Q

What are common themes of prejudices and what do they result in

A

dirty, stupid, insensitive, repulsive, aggressive and psychologically unstable Dehumanisation because they’re not worthy of dignity and respect that can lead to aggression and violence exacerbated when people feel interconnected in a socially satisfactory way because they can then safely dehumanise outgroup members

122
Q

What are critique points of the Robbers Cave study

A

Artificial situations → applicability of findings Ethical issues: deception to insight conflict that caused physical and possibly psychological harm Generalisability: 12 y/o white boys

123
Q

What are groups?

A

group of people working towards a common objective that might not include their personal goal but enables an interactive setting

124
Q

What are prosocial behaviours?

A

Voluntary and intentional acts that are valued positively by society – having positive social consequences and contributing to the physical or psychological well-being of another person.

125
Q

What are stereotypes

A

Widely shared generalisations about groups that are not static but object to change, that persistent if theyre readily available and seem logical

126
Q

What are subjective norms

A

perceived social pressure to engage or not to engage in a behaviour

127
Q

What are superordinate goals

A

Goals that both groups desire but that can be achieved only by both groups cooperating

128
Q

What are the different stages of the Robbers Cave study

A

1: boys arrived at the camp, and engaged in camp-wide activities, formed friendships. 2: camp was divided into two separated and isolated groups that split up friendships. The groups made little reference to each other apart from some embryonic ethnocentrism 3: groups were brought together to engage in organised intergroup competitions embracing sports contests and other activities. generated competition and intergroup hostility → generalised to situations outside the organised competitions. Ethnocentric attitudes and behaviour were amplified and coupled with intergroup aggression and ingroup solidarity. intergroup encounters => intergroup hostility. Intergroup relations deteriorated so dramatically that two of the experiments were hastily concluded at this stage 4: The two groups were provided with superordinate goals, goals they both desired but were unable to achieve on their own. The groups had to work together in cooperation

129
Q

What are the four criticisms of James-Lange’s theory by Cannon & Bard (1927,1931)?

A
  • Context matters* How the situation is ‘cognitively assessed’ is important* The physical arousal triggered by a stimulus can create different emotions (heart pounding: fear, joy)
130
Q

What are the four motivations that influence social cognition?

A

Self-assessment, self-enhancement, self-verification and the illusion of control

131
Q

What are the functions of attitudes? (Katz, 1960)

A
  • Knowledge * Instrumentality/Adjustment (means to an end or goal) * Ego-defence (protecting one’s self-esteem) * Value-expressiveness (allowing people to display values that uniquely identify and define them).
132
Q

What are the implications of this study for our understanding of intergroup competition and reconciliation?

A

Identifying common goals and intrests → superordinate goals Embryonic ethnocentrism was found in the absence of conflict

133
Q

What are the three branches of theories of aggression

A

psychodynamic, ethological and biosocial

134
Q

What are the two options when neither favourable nor unfavourable thoughts dominate the cognitive elaboration and information is processed through the peripheral route?

A

.

135
Q

What are three characteristics of an individualist (as opposed to collectivist) culture?

A

Directness, uniqueness, promotion of one’s own goals (Markus, Kitayama 1991) p.30/31

136
Q

What are three problems of nudges (Sugden, 2009)?

A
  1. finding out what would make people better off, as judged by themselves. 2. Policies do not correct reasoning failure (quality of decision-making) but use reasoning failure as an attempt to correct the outcomes of that failure. 3. Infringement on autonomy (Refute: simple adjustment of the context in which one can continue to exercise one’s autonomy)
137
Q

What are three types of resistance

A

forewarning, inoculation and reactance

138
Q

What are two challenges of Cognitive dissonance

A

Dissonance was not as easy to create as Festinger had outlined Bem’s (1972) self- perception theory may provide a more robust explanation in some cases

139
Q

What contributes to bystander apathy

A
  • Diffusion of responsibility (social loafing): “he’ll do it” * Fear of social blunders* Audience inhibition * Social influence: other people’s passivity correlated to one’s own
140
Q

What did Doll & Ajzen (1992) find (3) on the consistency between attitude behaviour?

A

Consistency is best when attitude is accessible expressed publiclyThe attitude holder identifies with a group for which the attitude is normative

141
Q

What did Strack, Martin and Stepper (1988) do their empirical research on?

A

Pen between teeth (vs lips) = cartoons are deemed funnier (facial feedback hypothesis)

142
Q

What did Tafjel (1971) find

A
  • Children strongly favoured their ingroup (social-categorisation) * Ingroup members were favoured even when there’s no personal gain, less opportunity to identify with other members of the group, the group members being selected randomly
143
Q

What does FAE not help us with?

A
  1. doesn’t help us understand the relative strength of dispositional vs. external factors that lead to observable behaviours2. we cannot know the true influence of someone’s disposition vs. their situation and to what degree they each played a role in the displayed behaviour. However, we can predict the FAE of others
144
Q

What does HARKing stand for?

A

HARKing involves presenting a hypothesis (which had been formed based on what the study’s results show) in one’s research report as if it were, in fact, an a priori hypothesis (had been thought of before conducting the research). This practice can lead to misleading outcomes. To maximise transparency in light of HARKing, some researchers now publish a protocol paper of their intended research before they collect data, which outlines the research they plan to conduct, and the hypotheses they hold, before actually conducting it.

145
Q

What does the Behavioural theory of rational choice claim?

A

bounded rationality => limited computational ability + short-term memory and selective perception Homo Sapiens= settle for satisficing methods instead of maximum utility or optimisation

146
Q

What historical event has had a great impact on social psychology?

A

The holocaust. It was a really poignant example for social influence and conformity, social loafing, bystander intervention → general impact on the study of antisocial behaviours which is counter-measured by positive psych

147
Q

What implementation intentions

A

specific action steps make the possibility of following through with an action more probable

148
Q

What is a bias

A

They result from heuristics that cause incorrect judgments which we consequently become drawn to under certain circumstances

149
Q

What is a heuristic?

A

“…a simple procedure (cognitive shortcut) that helps find adequate, though often imperfect, answers to difficult questions. The word comes from the same root as eureka.” (Kahneman, 2011)

150
Q

What is a Nudge, according to Hausman & Welch (2010) and Thaler & Sunstein (2008)?

A
  • intentional intervention enacted by one party systematically to influence the choice of another party (Hausman & Welch, 2010). * behavioural policy interventions that could alter people’s behaviour in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives. To count as a mere nudge, the intervention must be easy and cheap to avoid (Thaler & Sunstein, 2008).
151
Q

What is Billig’s (1996) principle to keep in mind when learning about social psychology?

A

Every argument (or conclusion) you read in social psychology should be considered against the possibility of its opposite (or alternative).

152
Q

What is Choice Architecture?

A

decisions we make are affected by the layout / sequencing / and range of choices that are available.

153
Q

What is cognitive consistency theory?

A

: people try to maintain internal consistency, order and agreement among their various cognitions.

154
Q

What is cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957)

A

an unpleasant state of psychological tension generated when a person has two or more cognitions that are inconsistent or do not fit together.

155
Q

What is compliance

A

Superficial, public and transitory change in behaviour and expressed attitudes in response to requests, coercion or group pressure

156
Q

What is conformity

A

includes a change in behaviour and a change in beliefs or attitudes needs to be response to a majority →hard to track with Asch

157
Q

What is Deindividuation

A

Process whereby people lose their sense of socialised individual identity and engage in unsocialised, often antisocial, behaviours (Festinger, Pepitone, Newcomb 1952)

158
Q

What is empathy

A

Ability to feel another person’s experiences; identifying with and experiencing another person’s emotions, thoughts and attitudes.

159
Q

What is forewarning

A

the act of notifying someone of persuasive efforts before undertaking them

160
Q

What is group polarisation

A

tendency for a group to produce decicisions that are more extreme than the previously presented average of individual opinions

161
Q

What is groupthink

A

group decision making that leads to poor decisions because the need for group harmony is stronger than the need to make rational decisions

162
Q

What is important about nudges?

A

Choice architecture already in place, no context vacuumCannot escape status quo/default Marketing tactics nudge us all the time Measurable efficacy – it seems to workWhat’s the alternative?

163
Q

What is inoculation

A

form of protection initiated by exposing a person to a weakened counter-attitudinal argument.

164
Q

What is Libertarian Paternalism?

A

a policy is paternalistic ‘if it tries to influence choices in a way that will make choosers better off, as judged by themselves’

165
Q

What is majority influence

A

public compliance with majority views with little or no private attitude change due to the desire of fitting in, normative or informational influences

166
Q

What is meant by bystander intervention and what is it influenced by

A

This occurs when an individual breaks out of the role of a bystander and helps another person in an emergency. Presence of a group because a lone bystander is more likely to help

167
Q

What is minority influence

A

Social influence processes whereby numerical or power minorities change the attitudes of the majority.

168
Q

What is obedience

A

can be imposed bz an individual forced compliance

169
Q

What is perceived behavioural control?

A

perceived knowledge, skills and capacity to perform behaviour

170
Q

What is reactance jack brehnm 1966

A

a psychological state we experience when someone tries to limit our personal freedom –> counteracting others zon’t zo it? watch me

171
Q

What is risky shift

A

one person considering capital punishment meets other people who are in favour of capital ⇒ group decisides on capital punishment

172
Q

What is social facilitation?

A

improvement in performance induced by the real, implied, or imagined presence of others. → co-action and audience effect

173
Q

What is social loafing

A

decreased group performance because of group workings and diffusion of responsibility

174
Q

What is stereotype lift

A

members of groups that attract favourable societal stereotypes

175
Q

What is stereotype threat

A

Feeling that we will be judged and treated in terms of negative stereotypes of our group, and that we will inadvertently confirm these stereotypes through our behaviour Impairs performance and increases anxiety (Steele and Aronson)

176
Q

What is the biosocial or evolutionary psychologist explanation of aggression

A

Tries to explain sociopsychological behaviour through Darwinian and evolutionary perspectives Aggression is important for survival of the species- potentially increases resources kin-selction and so on

177
Q

What is the bystander effect

A

People are less likely to help in an emergency when they are with others than when alone. The greater the number, the less likely it is that anyone will help.

178
Q

What is the Bystander-calculus model

A
  • In attending to an emergency, the bystander calculates the perceived costs and benefits of providing help compared with those associated with not helping. * physiological arousal: * The greater the arousal, the greater the chance that we will help. * e.g. the quicker our heartbeat, the quicker we respond (Gaertner & Dovidio, 1977). * Labelling the arousal as an emotion * Evaluating the costs of helping against the plight of the victims
179
Q

What is the catharsis hypothesis

A

notion that acting aggressively, or even just viewing aggressive material, reduces feelings of anger and aggression

180
Q

What is the central premise of multiple role theory?

A

Research findings indicate that having multiple social roles increases individual wellbeing. However, the quality, rather than quantity, of roles may be an influencing factor, and roles that create identities which are perceived as misaligned (butcher and animal advocate) can cause distress.

181
Q

What is the difference between social psychology and sociology?

A

Sociology is focused on behaviour at a group or cultural level, whereas social psychology is interested in the individual’s behaviour within such a group. p.36

182
Q

What is the ethnological explanation of aggression

A

a. Potential for Aggression, is instinctual but aggressive behaviour is elicited by the environmental stimuli = releasers

183
Q

What is the intention-behaviour gap

A

illustrates how attitudes can be a poor predictor of behaviour become sometimes situational factors override ones attitude (people who care about animals being carnivours) → behaviour is not changed or mantained despite intention

184
Q

What is the minimal group paradigm

A

Minimal conditions for intergroup behaviour to be ethnocentric and culminate in intergroup conflict or hostility

185
Q

What is the psychodynamic explanation of aggression

A

Aggression, rooted in the death instinct Thanatos which is opposed to the life instinct Eros, Self-destructive Thanatos is externalised throughout life because of bodily tensions The neo-freudians: viewed aggres- sion as a more rational, but nonetheless innate, process, whereby people sought a healthy release for primitive survival instincts that are basic to all animal species

186
Q

What is the relationship between basic and applied research in social psychology?

A

Findings from basic research can be subsequently applied to a real-world problem of interest or concern to society in applied research.

187
Q

What is the replication crisis?

A

The discovery that findings that were long thought to be robust in social psychology (and other branches of psychology) have been shown to be difficult to reproduce in replication studies. (ego depletion, social priming)

188
Q

What is the result of the Sherif Field Experiment 1966

A

prejudice, discrimination and ethocentrism arose as a result of intergroup conflict that was realintergroup relations were gradually improved through cooperative intergroup relations centred around superordinate goalsless frustrated groups (winners) was more aggressive

189
Q

What is the Robbers Cave study (1966)

A

study on intergroup dynamics and groundwork for realistic conflict theory

190
Q

What is the theory of reasoned action

A

behaviour is performed if a person’s attitude and said action is favourable so a specific attitude has normative support which predicts the intention to act

191
Q

What neuroimaging tool has been particularly beneficial over the last 20 years, and integral to the growth of social cognitive neuroscience?

A

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) produces brain scan images -> researches in social cognitive neuroscience to closely examine changes in brain activity before, during or after people experience phenomena of interest in social psychology. fMRI has also revealed that brain regions function as highly interconnected network of activity, and it is difficult to attribute complex social psychological behaviours/thoughts (i.e. social rejection, prejudice) entirely to one specific brain area.

192
Q

What traditions existed and what was their distinguishing factor?

A

German tradition: focused on the ‘collective mind’ without any concrete empirical methods in place to test theories American tradition: proposed in Floyd Allport’s publication, inspired by the growth of experimental psychology in the USA

193
Q

What was Schachter & Singers’ starting assumption in their theory of emotion?

A

Emotions are determined jointly by perception of physiology (as in James-Lange) AND cognitive assessment of the situation

194
Q

What was the hypothesis of Schachter & Singer’s (1962) study

A

Irritating context vs. humorous context = anger vs. euphoria

195
Q

What’s the common definition for social psychology?

A

Social psychology is the scientific investigation of how the thoughts, feelings and behaviours of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined or implied presence of others (Allport, 1956)

196
Q

What’s the frustration-aggression hypothesis by Dollard?

A

simplistic and circular explanation of how aggression is caused by a frustrating event whereby frustration is loosely defined

197
Q

What’s the objective of libertarian paternalism

A

‘balance the extent to which we believe people actually fail to make adequate judgements in their own interests, and how much we are willing to restrict people’s (perceived) autonomy, against the amount of good which can be promoted or harm prevented as a result’.

198
Q

When does a nudge become a push?

A

When the possibility of choice is removed

199
Q

When is an act truly altruistic (Batson, Duncan, Ackerman, Buckley, & Birch, 1981)

A

act is truly altruistic only if people seek to help even when they will no longer be troubled by observing the suffering of another person (e.g. turning back to help after pass- ing a stranded motorist). This invites a different perspective on the Genovese case. The bystanders felt disturbed, but not enough to act: perhaps they could not identify with the victim Probably occurs in situations easy to escape

200
Q

When is public self-awareness helpful to individuals and society?

A
  • may prepare to perform better at a public event because they know others will be evaluating them. * follow social norms that are in the collective interest to adhere to (i.e. not listening to loud music on public transport).
201
Q

Where does cognitive dissonance follow from in Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) experiment

A

Dissonance follows from the fact that you have agreed to say things about what you have experienced when you know that the opposite is true. You have been induced to behave in a counter-attitudinal way

202
Q

Which one of the following statements does NOT describe research on self-schemas by Markus (1977): a) Identifying as self-schematic on words related to a trait increases the speed of association with words related to that trait in a reaction time task b) Being self-schematic on one dimension (of independence or dependence) increases the ability to remember autobiographical memories showing this dimension c) Participants identifying as aschematic on dimensions of independence and dependence were slower to accurately categorise words related to both dimensions in a reaction time task d) A person who identifies as self-schematic on introversion can use this self-awareness to be more extraverted in social contexts

A

d

203
Q

Which one of these aspects (approachable, optimistic, cynical, ethical) would a person rate themselves more poorly on, in comparison to a rating they would give to an average person?

A

a person would rate themself more negatively on the attribute of being cynical since it is a negative attribute in comparison to the other options that are generally more positive and due to the above-average-effect (pp.137) people rend to rate themselves higher on positive attributes and lower on negative attributes

204
Q

Which three invisible factors can threaten the validity of theory and research?

A

Incentives, the file-drawer problem/ publication bias, biases.

205
Q

Who argued for the separation of Social Psychology from what, when and why?

A

It was Floyd Allport’s publication from 1924 which truly set a distinction as he argued the use of experimental science could act as an distinction of SP from the other disciplines.

206
Q

Who presented approaches crowd behaviour?

A

McDoughall, Freud, LeBon

207
Q

Why is having an attitude useful?

A

Because we orient towards the attitude object and react accordingly, as long as the attitude is easily accessible.

208
Q

Why is the concept of catharsis rejected Bushman, Baumeister and Stack (1999)

A

Bushman, Baumeister and Stack (1999) found that those who hit a punching bag, believing that it reduced stress, were more likely later to punish someone who had transgressed against them

209
Q

Who are the fathers of social psychology?

A
  • German: Immanuel Kant, Willhelm von Humbolt, Johann Friedrich Herbart* British: David Hume and Adam Smith* French: Auguste Comte
210
Q

What can be said at large about the “fathers of psychology” when it comes to social psychology?

A

Though Humes and Smiths’ publications are also very crucial to the field, it is mostly Herbart and, even more frequently, Comte who have been dubbed as the fathers of Social Psychology.

211
Q

Ultimate Attribution Bias was proposed by?

A

Pettigrew (1979)

212
Q

Ultimate Attribution Bias proposes that

A

negative outgroup behaviour is dispositionally attributed, while positive outgroup behaviour is externally attributed to the preservation of an outgroup image.

213
Q

Important theorist behind the concept of self-esteem

A

Rosenberg (1968)

214
Q

Self-esteem can be defined as?

A

people’s subjective appraisal of themselves as intrinsically positive or negative

215
Q

Private Self-awareness was proposed by?

A

Buss (1980)

216
Q

Private self-awareness describes the

A

psychological state where an individual is aware of the private, personal aspects of the self

217
Q

What do attribution theories describe?

A

Describe how we attribute causes to our own or other’s behaviour

218
Q

What are the seven main theories of attribution?

A
  1. Naive Psychology Theory 2. Correspondent Inference3. Attributional Style 4. Covariation Theory5. Self-Perception Theory 6. Attributional Theory 7. Intergroup Attribution
219
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Intergroup Attribution and what do they propose?

A

Deschamp (1983) suggests that we assign cause of one’s own or others’ behaviour to group membership

220
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Attributional Theory and what do they propose?

A

Weiner (1979,1985) proposes that attribution is based on how well people perform on a task

221
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Self-Perception Theory and what do they propose?

A

Daryl Bem (1967, 1972) suggests we make self-attributions to gain knowledge about ourselves

222
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Covariation Theory and what do they propose?

A

Harold Kelley (1967) suggests that assigning a cause to behaviour depends on the factor that seemingly covaries the most, to make an internal/dispositional or external/environmental attribution (consistency, distinctiveness, consensus)

223
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Attributional Style and what do they propose?

A

Rotter (1966) claims the existence of personal pre-dispositions to make a certain type of attribution (Internal vs. External) -> locus of control}}

224
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Correspondence Inference and what do they propose?

A

Jones and Davis (1965) propose the idea that behaviour corresponds with personality traits, which is how we can infer about it so we can maintain the idea of control and a predictable world

225
Q

Who’s the theorist behind Native Psychology Theory and what do they propose?

A

Heider (1958) suggests people use cause-effect analyses in order to understand the world

226
Q

By whom was Fundamental Attribution Error proposed?

A

Ross (1977)

227
Q

What does fundamental attribution error describe?

A

tendency to attribute more internally dispositional causes to other’s behaviour than externally situational causes in others

228
Q

What is fundamental attributon error the basis for?

A

Ultimate Attribution Bias Pettigrew (1979) focused on outgroup behaviour

229
Q

What are three ways mood regulation and self-esteem relate to each other?

A
  1. Individuals with lower levels of self-esteem are less likely to make the effort to make themselves feel better (Heimpel et al. 2002)2. lower self-esteem is likely to downplay the positive feelings they experienced when recalling positive life events (Wood et al., 2003)3. tendency to make themselves feel less positive and distract themselves from the positive feelings. (Wood et al., 2003)p.78
230
Q

How do mortality salience and self-esteem relate to each other?

A
  • against the anxiety of death, individuals collaborate to construct a cultural worldview -> impart meaning, permanence and stability to life* agreed standards => may be evaluated & alignment with standards of value = hope of transcending death (literally or symbolically)* terror management theory: self-esteem through sociometer theory* self-esteem is a tremendous bufferp.79
231
Q

Who proposed impression management?

A

Goffman (1959)

232
Q

What does impression management describe?

A

active process of self-presentation, which consists of taking steps to monitor their presentation of self in their interactions with others so that they appear to others in the best possible

233
Q

On what do individualist cultures focus on to what effect on relationships?

A

individuality of each person → social relationships are voluntary

234
Q

Which are valued aspects of individualist cultures?

A
  • uniqueness* expressing one’s own views* promotion of one’s own goals* directness
235
Q

Key difference between Emotion and Mood?

A
  • Emotion: Short in duration, intense, clear target* Mood: long in duration, subliminal, no clear direction
236
Q

Who proposed the Actor-Observer Effect, and what is it an extension of?

A

Jones and Nisbett (1972) proposed it as an extension of correspondence bias

237
Q

What does the Actor-Observer Effect describe?

A

tendency to attribute others’ behaviour internally to dispositional factors (observer) and one’s own to external factors (actor)

238
Q

What is the role of perceptual focus in the Actor-Observer Effect?

A

Actors can’t see themselves behaving

239
Q

What is the role of informational difference in the Actor-Observer Effect?

A

actors tend to have a wealth of information enabling them to make external attributions

240
Q

What are collectivist cultures characterised by?

A

social interactions with each other, social beings who are inseparably connected to others

241
Q

What implication does the characterisation of collectivist cultures have on relationships?

A

social interactions are involuntary and vital as they make the person what they are

242
Q

What is valued in collectivist cultures?

A
  1. belonging2. being aware of other’s views3. indirectness
243
Q

What are biases (Fiske & Taylor 2013)?

A

systematic errors in our rational thinking, perception and attitudes

244
Q

What is a different way to define biases?

A

adaptive characteristics of ordinary, everyday social perception

245
Q

By whom was confirmation bias coined?

A

Trope & Thompson, 1997

246
Q

What is confirmation bias?

A

the tendency to seek, interpret, create information that confirms existing ideas, explanations for the cause of an event

247
Q

Moderation describes?

A

a relationship between two variables depending on the level of a third variable.

248
Q

What are five strengths of the theory of planned behaviour?

A
  1. continuing heuristic value2. more or less consistent predictions of the likelihood of behaviour based on PBC and intentions3. when enough variables are added –> good predictive validity4. considers behaviour-cognition feedback loops5. useful framework for interventions
249
Q

What are common criticisms of the theory of planned behaviour?

A
  1. incomplete account of intentional variance2. no actual techniques for effective attitudinal change3. inconsiderate of unconscious influences and emotions4. limited predictive validity (people who set intentions but fail)5. potentially undervalues age, SES, mental health & identity effects
250
Q

How has the TPB criticism of it being inconsiderate of unconscious influences and emotions been countered?

A

unconscious influences are considered as they flow through subjective norm, attitudes and perceived control

251
Q

How has the TPB’s criticism of not providing strategies to produce effective change in beliefs been countered?

A

the goal is to predict and explain, not to be prescriptive

252
Q

According to the Yale approach to communication and persuasion, through which processes can people be persuaded?\

A

attention, comprehension and acceptance

253
Q

According to the Yale approach to communication and persuasion, which factors are crucial for persuasion?

A

message, source, audience

254
Q

According to the Yale approach to communication and persuasion, what are the possible changes persuasive communication can produce?

A

opinion, perception, affect or action change

255
Q

What five components of the audience affect persuasive communication?

A
  1. Persuasibility2. Initial position3. Intelligence4. Self-esteem5. Personality
256
Q

What five components of the source affect persuasive communication?

A
  1. Expertise2. Trustworthiness3. Likeability4. Status5. Race
257
Q

What four components of the source affect persuasive communication?

A
  1. Order of arguments2. one- or two-sided arguments3. Type of appeal4. explicit vs implicit conclusion
258
Q

What are the dimensions in Weiner’s Task Performance Attribution (1979)?

A

Whether Control or Lack of control are internal/external and stable/unstable

259
Q

What does stability mean in Weiner’s Task Performance Attribution (1979)?

A

is the internal/external cause stable/unstable?

260
Q

What does locus mean in Weiner’s Task Performance Attribution (1979)?

A

performance is caused (internally) by the actor or (externally) by the situation

261
Q

In Weiner’s Task Performance Attribution/ Attributional Theory (1979), what happens if someone deems something permanently within their control?

A

They show typical effort towards it

262
Q

In Weiner’s Task Performance Attribution/ Attributional Theory (1979), what happens if someone deems something changing and outside their control?

A

They rely on luck

263
Q

What was the conclusion of Scheier and Carver (1977)?

A

a person being in a positive/negative mood impacts the focus of their self-reflection and thus furthering the current feeling of positivity/negativity

264
Q

What was the Wilson and Ross (2001) study on, and what was their conclusion?

A

Temporal comparison: People create disadvantaged past selves for temporal downward comparison

265
Q

What is the central route governed by?

A

motivation and ability

266
Q

What is the peripheral route?

A

the “lazy” route through which attitude change is temporary and less likely to predict future behaviour

267
Q

What is the central route?

A

route where information is cognitively elaborated/ analysed to produce attitude change that is likely enduring and predictive

268
Q

What is someone with an interdependent self-construal likely pursuing?

A

self-critical self-improvement

269
Q

What is someone with an independent self-construal likely pursuing?

A

positive and unique self-identification and strive for self-enhancement

270
Q

What is a self-construal?

A

self-concept

271
Q

What was Miller (1984) about, and what was the conclusion?

A
  • Compared 4 age groups of Indian and Americans who narrated prosocial and antisocial behaviour and gave theoir spontaneous explanations* Miller coded the responses* In western cultures: more internal attributions with increasing age
272
Q

What are possible goals in realistic conflict theory (Sherif, 1966)?

A

Shared goals or mutually exclusive goals

273
Q

What do shared goals require (Sherif, 1966)?

A

cooperation of groups

274
Q

What is realistic conflict theory (Sherif, 1966)?

A

goal relations between individuals and groups determine cooperation or competition between groups and thus, interpersonal and intergroup behaviour

275
Q

How can the depersonalised effects of social identity theory that might cause identity fusion and aggressive behaviour be avoided with social mobility?

A

individual mobility, aka. assimilating into the high-status group

276
Q

How can the depersonalised effects of social identity theory that might cause identity fusion and aggressive behaviour be avoided with social change when there are no present cognitive alternatives?

A

social creativity

277
Q

What are three tactics specific to social creativity?

A
  1. Redefining value of existing dimensions2. Comparing to different outgroups3. Creating new dimension of intergroup comparison
278
Q

How can the depersonalised effects of social identity theory that might cause identity fusion and aggressive behaviour be avoided with social change when there are present cognitive alternatives?

A

social competition

279
Q

What are tactics used when someone is trying to improve social identity with social competition?

A

civil rights activity, political lobbying, terrorism, war

280
Q

How are groups defined in social identity theory and realistic conflict theory?

A
  • SIT: groups as manifestations of social categories* RCT: groups as collectives working towards shared goals
281
Q

Where does conflict originate in social identity theory and realistic conflict theory?

A
  • SIT: desire to feel positive about ingroup compared to outgroup* RCT: competition due to limited resources
282
Q

What is the most important resource in social identity theory and realistic conflict theory?

A
  • SIT: symbols of importance* RCT: material or political power
283
Q

What is the group’s goal in social identity theory and realistic conflict theory?

A
  • SIT: relative superiority* RCT: absolute resources and superiority
284
Q

What is the individual’s goal in social identity theory and realistic conflict theory?

A
  • SIT: self-esteem, understanding oneself, meaning* RCT: material security, belonging to group
285
Q

What was Schwartz’s (1991) study about ?

A
  • participants asked to recall 6 vs. 12 assertive or friendly* some only had to do 6 vs 6* participants saw themselves as less assertive/friendly after listing 12 because too many to remember (availability bias and attributional processes)
286
Q

What happened when participants were told that other (imaginary) participants struggled more or less (Schwartz, 1991)

A

-> changed their previous opinion