PITT TO PEEL- WELLS Flashcards
When was William Pitt asked by George III to form a government?
19th december 1783
Why did many people think Pitt would not last?
- He only had limited experience of political life
- The rest of the cabinet sat in the house of Lords
- In the house of commons the majority of MP’s supported the former ministry, a coalition of the whigs
- Pitt had no real popular following and had only become MP as he had been nominated for the ‘pocket borough’ of Appleby
- He lacked charm and seemed unable to win over MP’s
Who led the Whigs in 1783?
-Charles James Fox and the supporters of Lord North-an experienced national leader
How could at any time Pitts government have been ‘rendered powerless’?
By the votes of the opponents in the house of the commons
What were the main reasons George appointed Pitt?
- he wanted an able and loyal prime minster in place of the Whig ministers who wanted to dominate him
- he disliked the alliance between the Whigs and the previous prime minister, Lord North which he thought was unprincipled as they were former political enemies
What would happen to Pitt if he didn’t have the support of the house of commons?
- He would not be able to carry out the normal business of government or pass any legislation
- the King would then have to appoint Whig ministers he disliked and he would be shown to be powerless
What would happen if Pitt could not govern?
-It would show that the king really had no influence in his choice of ministers
What was meant by the ‘mince pie ministry’?
Pitts new government not lasting until Christmas ‘a kingdom trusted to a school boys care”
Why in January 1784 did the King write to Pitt urging him to call an election?
He was concerned that it was wrong for Pitt to remain prime minister with only royal backing and without a majority to support him in the house of commons
For three months, despite having no majority in the house of commons, Pitt delayed the election, what two things was he hoping for?
- That the kings agents would be preparing to use royal influence effectively in coming elections
- That he would establish a reputation in parliament as a statesman
Who did Pitt win over with his speeches int he house of commons?
The independent country MP’s- with a distinct group of ‘Pittite’ MP’s
When did Pitt pass the mutiny bill?
March 1784
What was the mutiny bill?
An annual measure to confirm the legality of military discipline
What would happen without the mutiny bill?
-what would happen if the opposition managed to defeat it?
It would not be possible to maintain the armed forces
–it would show that Pitt lacked the authority to govern
How had Pitt gained the advantage by March 1784?
- He had set out ideas for reform
- He seemed to be loyal and patriotic (supporting the king against selfish and powerful whigs)
- He had won the respect of many of the independent MP’s in the commons
- He gained respect for his integrity by refusing to accept royal sinecures
- He had public recognition
- He had support of one of the most influential political managers (John Robinson)
- He had the confidence of the king
- He was an expert in gaining the support of Rotten Bourough’s
How did the backing of the King contribute towards the success of the 1784 election?
- In the house of Lords Pitt could count on a majority because of the influence of peers who were linked to or part of George III’s personal household
- the king created new peers throughout Pitt’s time in office
- The bishops in church of England who had the right to vote in the house of Lords tended to favour the crown
- Peers who were loyal to the king were often influential in getting MP’s elected because they controlled many of the small boroughs
- Pitt was able to use royal patronage to reward supporters
Although the support of George III was important in Pitts rise what other factors played a key role?
- an obviously principled, reform minded and independent politician
- Pitt had a distinguished farther who could win the respect of many independent MP’s
- Dislike in the country of an obviously artificial coalition between Fox and Lord north and th influence of the Whigs
What was the significance of the 1784 election?
In some areas there was popular enthusiasm and the election campaign was well fought
Who managed the local influence and backstairs deals that supported Pitt’s supporters?
Robinson
Of the 558 MP’s elected in the 1784 election, how many were the ‘crown party’ (those who would support whoever the king favoured?
185
What factors can the outcome of the 1794 election be explained by?
- ) The use of influence of influence and patronage by royal agents was used to return MP’s to Pitt because he was the King’s chosen minister
- ) Pittie’s generally won in those contests which returned independent MP’s- who were impressed by the strong impression that Pitt had given himself and the reputation of his father
- )Pitt attracted those who favoured reform and a more moral and principled type of politics than practiced by the Foxites
Why did Pitt need to reform finance and administration?
- ) Pitt was influenced by his time as chancellor of the exchequer under Shelburne, the previous prime minister who had ideas about modernising and improving finance and the government
- )Pressure from the country- saw the defeat of the American war as Britain being ineffective
- )The 18th century had seen many overseas wars and payment which necessitated heavy spending and increased levels of taxation-in consequence the role of the state grew-it was thought that it was the role of the government to introduce financial and administrative reforms
- ) National debt eating up government income (more and more tax revenue was being paid straight out to those that had invested in government bonds, one of the main means for raising revenue.
- )Pitts reputation was built on a desire for cheaper and more efficient government
- )Strong feeling that Britain should be more moral and pure- this should be reflected in a more honest, less corrupt and less expensive administration
Describe the term ‘fiscal-military state’ which Britain had reached by 1783
Britains wars led to a considerable increase in taxation (fiscal) as well as a large navy and armed forces (military). This led to an association with corruption and the power of a few men