Piaget’s Theory Flashcards
Piaget believed that cognitive development was a result of what 2 influences?
Biological Maturation - effects of biological processes of ageing
As children get older, certain mental operations become possible
Environment - as children interact with their environment, their understanding of the world becomes more complex
What is a schema?
Cognitive frameworks that contain our knowledge and understanding of objects, people or ideas
Children are born with basic innate schemas such as a me-schema (representation of the human face)
What is assimilation?
The process of incorporating new information into an existing schema
What is accommodation?
Occurs when a child changes or adapts an existing schema to understand new information that doesn’t seem to fit into existing knowledge
What is equilibration?
The preferred mental state
Balance that occurs after a child has learnt new information that they have to accommodate for
AO3: understanding of cognitive development ✅
P: one strength of Piaget’s theory is its contribution to our understanding of cognitive development
E: Piaget’s theory combines both nature and nurture to explain how thinking changes with age
E: it has also changed ideas about children, has had an influence of educational practise and has generated much research interest
L: this means that it has provided many valuable insights into how children’s minds develop
AO3: discovery learning has had an impact of education ✅
P: one strength is that Piaget’s idea that children learn by actively exploring their environment (discovery learning) has had a huge influence of education
E: young children no longer sit in rows copying from the board. Instead, they engage actively in tasks that allow them to construct their own understanding
E: these child centred applications have changed the way children are taught today
L: this therefore has hopefully made education more effective and enjoyable, increasing the value of discovery learning in education
AO3: too much emphasis on motivation ❌
P: Piaget has been criticised for overestimating how motivated children are to learn
E: he viewed learning as a motivated process in which children learn in order to escape the unpleasant feelings associated with disequilibrium
E: however, children vary greatly in their intellectual curiosity, and the children Piaget studied may have been more motivated to learn as they came mainly from the nursery attached to the university
L: this means that his findings may not generalise to all children
Name the 4 stages of Piaget’s intellectual development.
Sensorimotor
Preoperational
Concrete operations stage
Formal operations stage
What is the sensorimotor stage? (include reasoning ability)
- 0-2 years
- a child lacks internal schemas or representations, they only see the world through their senses and movement
- child repeats actions to test sensorimotor relationships
- object permanece: develops at 8 months, this is when a child is able to recognise that an object still exists even when it can’t be seen
What is the research support for object permanence?
Blanket and ball study (Piaget, 1963)
- piaget hid a ball underneath a blanket whilst the child was watching and observed whether the child searched for it or not
- movement = object permanence
- results shows that children 8 months or over showed object permanence, whereas children below 8 months did not
AO3: object permanence may happen earlier ❌
P: there is evidence that object permanence may occur earlier than piaget suggested
E: Baillargeon used a technique called violation of expectation (VOE). it exploits the fact that children tend for look longer at things that they haven’t encountered before.
E: the results found object permanence as early as 3 months
L: piagets results may be due to a motivation for the child to find the object or the child may not even have the physical coordination needed necessary to retrieve the object
What is the preoperational stage? (include reasoning ability)
- 2-7 years
- children are able to think about things symbolically
- lack of conservation: they cannot understand that a quantity cannot change, even if it’s appearance does
- egocentrism: children can only see the world from their perspective and fail to recognise other peoples perspectives
- lack of class inclusion: young children can classify objects into categories but not sub groups
What is research support for conservation and egocentrism?
conservation - piaget (1954): two rows of identical numbers of counters were laid parallel to each other
the child was asked whether the number of counters was the same, then piaget would space out the counters on one row of counters, so they were further apart: the child was then asked the same question
results found that the children with lack of conservation would say the row of counters that were further spaced out had the larger number
egocentrism - three mountain study (piaget 1956): a child and a doll were sat either side of a mountain model, where there were both seeing different objects
the child was then shown a series of photos of the mountain model and was asked which photo looks most similar to the view the doll was seeing
results showed that children in the pre-operational stage picked the photo that was the most similar to their view
AO3: conservation must have meaning ❌
McGarrigle and Donaldson (1974) repeated piagets conservation experiment using counters
- when the experiment was repeated, the exact same results were found as piagets original study: children in the pre-operational stage would say the counters that were more spread out had the larger number
- however, when a teddy bear was used instead and messed up the row of counters, 62% of children in the pre-operational age bracket were able to conserve
- it appears that the children in the original experiment assume that the researcher intends to alter the number of counters, or are asking a trick question