Physiological Psychology Flashcards
Describe the two-factor theory of emotion
An emotional state may be considered a function of a state of physiological arousal and of a cognition appropiate to this state of arousal.
i.e. emotion results from a combination of two things: (i) a state of arousal, and (ii) an interpretative cognition that labels the state of arousal as an emotion
State the three propositions/hypotheses made by Schachter & Singer
- Given a state of physiological arousal for which an individual has no immediate explanation, he will ‘label’ this state and describe his feelings in terms of the cognitions available to him.
- Given a state of physiological arousal for which an individual has a completely appropiate explanation, no evaluative needs will arise and the individual is unlikely to label his feelings in terms of the alternative cognitions available.
- Given cognitive cirsumstances similar to that which had previously produced emotion, the individual will only react emotionally only to the extent that he experiences a state of physiological arousal.
Describe the method and groups used in Schachter and Singer’s study
-
Lab experiment with observation & self-report questionnaires
- IV(injection and stooge behaviour)/groups: EPI INF (anger/euphoria), EPI MIS (euphoria), EPI IGN (anger/euphoria), Placebo (anger/euphoria)
- DV: subject behaviour with stooge (objective), questionnaire response (subjective)
- Independent groups
EPI MIS were told they would feel numb, have an itching sensation and a slight headache. Placebo were told nothing (like EPI IGN).
No EPI MIS anger condition as this was a control condition to evaluate possible artifactual effect of EPI INF instructions
Explain the predicted outcomes of each of the groups used in Schachter & Singer
- Epi Inf: should have completely appropiate explanation for bodily state and should not be influenced by stooge
- Epi Ign: no explanation for bodily state so should be influenced by stooge
- Epi Mis: no explanation for bodily state so should be influenced by stooge
- Placebo: no change in bodily state so not influenced by stooge
Describe the sample used in Schachter and Singer’s study
-
184 male students
- studying introductory psychology
- given two extra points on final exam (demand characteristics)
- records cleared with Student Health Service
- originally 185, 1 rejected the injection
Describe the procedure of Schachter and Singer’s study
- Taken to a private room, told the study was of the effects of vitamin supplement Suproxin on vision (deception)
- Instructions/info given depending on condition
- Pulse taken, injected with epinephrine/placebo
- Placed in room with stooge (euphoria/anger) for 20 mins (for ‘Suproxin’ to be ‘absorbed into bloodstream’), observed through one-way mirror
- Pulse taken, questionnaire given
- Debriefed, answered questionnaire on experiences with adrenaline and knowledge/suspicion of experiment
Describe the stooge’s behaviour in the euphoria and anger conditions in Schachter & Singer’s study
note: the stooge did not know which condition the subject was in
Euphoria
- doodles, crumples and throws paper, basketball game, asks participant to join
- paper plane, throws it multiple times, throws at subject
- slingshot, manila folder tower, shoots at tower
- hula hoop, hula hoop on arm, then sit with feet on table
Anger
- introduction, stooge says he wished they’d told them about the shots
- given 5-page questionnaire with personal/insulting questions (e.g. father’s income, mother’s extramarital relationships)
- stooge’s comments become increasingly angry
Describe how the behaviour of subjects was coded in the anger and euphoria conditions of Schachter & Singer’s study
Coded into categories, scored:
- Euphoria: joins activity, initiates new activity, ignores stooge, watches stooge
- two observers independently coded 2 sessions
- sum weighted scores for duration spent on activities – represents extent to which subject joined stooge’s activities
- Anger: agrees, disgreses, netural, intiates dis/agreement watches, ignores
- two observers indepdently coded 3 sessions
- Positive anger index indicates subject agrees with stooges, negative indicates disagreement
Describe the self-report questionnaire given to the subjects after their time with the stooge in Schachter & Singer’s study
- Mock questions about hunger, fatigue
- 5-point Likert scale:
- irritated/angry/annoyed
- good/happy
- palpitations
- tremors
- 4-point scale:
- numbness
- itching
- headache
- Open questions:
- other physical & emotional sensations
Describe the results of the effects of epinephrine on bodily state in Schachter & Singer’s study
- Increased pulse rate, palpitations & tremors
- However, not equal effectiveness with all subjects
- Epi Mis condition – mostly did not experience false symptoms (numbness, itching, headches)
Describe the results of emotions shown by the subjects in Schachter & Singer’s study
Euphoria
- Epi Mis happiest (self-report score almost twice than Epi Inf): no explanation for state
- then Epi Ign: comes up with own explanation of bodily state ∴ less susceptible
- Subjects who made connection between injection and bodily state:
- Epi Ign: 28%
- Epi Mis: 16%
- Subjects who made connection between injection and bodily state:
- then Epi Inf - had explanation for bodily state
Anger
- Self-report unreliable – subjects refused to endanger points gained for final exam, thus not admitting irritation until after experiment
- willing to manifest anger when ‘alone’ with the stooge
- Anger index for Epi Ign – positive and large
- Epi Ign significantly angrier than Placebo – epinephrine leads to angrier state
Additionally:
For Epi Ign and Epi Mis, answers to open ended questions clearly attributed their physical state to their injection e.g. “the shot gave me the shivers”.
Thus the experimental procedure of injecting the subjects , by providing an alternative cognition, has, to some extent, obscured the effects of epinephrine.
Evaluate Schachter & Singer’s study
- Generalisation: no for all states of physiological arousal; yes for any pronounced internal state for which no appropriate explanation is available, no; all male from same uni
- Reliability: high; inter-rater reliability, standardised procedure, observation and self-report can be compared
- Validity: low; demand characteristics in self-report, likert scale used, not assesed for emotion before the study, some subjects were suspicious; high; one-way mirror observation reduces demand char.
- Ecological validity: low; lab
- Ethics: yes; health checked, debriefed, right to withdraw; no; deception
- Usefulness: yes; scientific knowledge
Describe the four stages of NREM sleep, and the stage of REM sleep
These stages progress cyclically from 1 through REM then begin again with stage 1. A complete sleep cycle takes about 90-110 minutes.
- 1 & 2 - light sleep, irregular EEG
- 3 - deeper sleep, regular wave patterns (delta waves)
- 4 - deep sleep
- REM - high energy, low voltage brain waves, eye movements, increased pulse, relaxed skeletal muscles
Describe 3 theories for why we dream
- Freud: reveals unconscious desires, enabling wishes to be fulfilled in the dream
- Cognitive: time is spent organising mental structures, reflecting on the day’s information
- Physiological: random firing of neurons create images we add meaning to
Describe the background of Dement & Kleitman
- Aserinksy & Kleitman (1955) observed periods of rapid, conjugate eye movements during sleep
- High incidence of dream recall when awoken during these periods & low incidence at other times
- Confirmed in both normal Ss and schizophrenics
- Wanted to test relation between eye movements and dreaming
List 3 methods of measuring sleep activity
- EEG: records brain activity
- EOG: records eye activity
- EMG: records muscle activity (not used in Dement & Kleitman)
What were the aims of Dement & Kleitman’s study? (see ‘approaches’ in original study)
- Test dream recall during rapid eye movement without direct contact between E and S
- Test the subjective estimate of the duration of dreams compared with the length of eye movement periods before awakening
- Relate the pattern of eye movements to the dream content to test whether they represented a specific expression of the visual experience of dreaming