Physical Geography Fieldwork Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the aim or question of your study?

A

To investigate downstream changes in channel characteristics along Glenderaterra Beck, near Keswick, Cumbria.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where is the location of study?

A

Glenderaterra Beck, Blencathra, Cumbria.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why did we choose this site for our fieldwork?

A
  • The river is shallow and therefore safe to undertake fieldwork in.
  • It is easily accessible from a public foot path.
  • Reliable rainfall in the area so we should have a reliable flow of water.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do you measure wet width?

A

The tape measure is held at the left bank where the water meets the bank. It is held taut across the river surface, perpendicular to flow to the right bank; the width is recorded in centimetres.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why did you use this method to measure the wet width?

A

To work out the area so we can measure the discharge. We used this method because it is safe, straight forward and accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the limitations of measuring wet width using a tape measure?

A

Because the channel is sometimes at an angle, the river undercuts the bank. This makes it difficult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What method is used to measure river depth?

A

The river depth is divided systematically into ten equal intervals. The metre stick is placed in the stream until it reaches the river bed at each interval, held with the narrow side into the flow. The depth is read at the water surface in centimetres.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why do you measure the river depth?

A

By finding the depth we can learn how the discharge changes down stream and how deep the river gets across the river. Also, we use this method as you can compare the depths to the river basin. It is a good method as it is accurate and easy to do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the limitations in measuring river depth using a metre stick?

A

The person measuring the depth may push the stick into the sediment when measuring. This would cause data to be inaccurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How are the results from wet width presented?

A

Using a bar chart or scatter graph.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the positives of using this technique?

A

BAR CHART
-You are able to see clearly if there has been an increase or decrease, so it is easy to see the results.

  • Bar charts are easer to read off than scatter graphs.
  • Easy to make a bar chart- less errors are likely to be made. Allows you to make a valid conclusion on how the width changes downstream.
  • Simple and easy to understand.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the negatives of using a bar chart?

A
  • In order to make a valid conclusion you have to take many measurements which is very time consuming.
  • Shows average depth but it doesn’t show shape or cross section.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is data from river depth presented?

A
  • Cross sectional graph.
  • Bar chart.
  • Scatter graph.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the positives of using this technique?

A
  • Cross section diagram shows a visual representation of where the river bed is most eroded.
  • Bar charts and cross sectional diagrams are easy to do and are quick and simple to read.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the negatives of using this technique?

A

-Only shows a small portion of a river. In order to fully understand the changes of the whole length of the river you would have to draw many to make a conclusion which is very time consuming.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the results of the wet width?

A

The average wet width for five sites on site 1, which is a first order stream was 193 cm.

The average for the second sites on the 2nd order stream was wider at 339 cm.

17
Q

What conclusions can be drawn from the results of wet width?

A

Our results show that as the river goes from 193 cm at site 1 to 339 at site 2, rivers start to get wider as they go downstream.

This is because after site 1 which was the first order stream many tributaries have joined to make another site which is called a second order stream. Due to tributaries joining the river the result is a higher discharge which increases the width, as it erodes the river banks.

18
Q

What were the results of the river depth?

A

The average river depth for five sites on site 1 which is a first order stream was 11.5 cm. The average for the second order sites on the 2nd order stream is deeper at 14.4cm .

19
Q

What conclusions can be drawn from the results of the river depth?

A

Our results at site 1 which is a first order stream had a depth of 11.5 cm. At site two which is a second order stream had a depth of 14.4 cm.

This was what we expected and our results seem accurate as their is a higher discharge as other tributaries join, and the bed would’ve eroded deeper.