PHRM3031 - Research Ethics Flashcards
key principles in bio ethics
4
- respect for autonomy: respect the rights and dignity of individuals
- beneficence: help people
- non maleficence: do no harm
- justice: treat people fairly
key principles in research ethics (5)
- merit and integrity of the research: conduct good studies well
- respect for autonomy: respect the rights and dignity of individuals
- beneficence: help people
- non maleficence: do no harm
- justice: treat people fairly
human research ethics committees
- min 8 ppl, ideally equal men and women with a third of the committee external to the institution
at least: - 2 lay people
- one health care professional
- one person who performs a pastoral role (eg.priest or elder)
- one lawyer
-two researches
merit and integrity
definition
- research has to be good science to be ethical. research with merit
- -aims to fill gaps in our knowledge
- -is will designed to answer its aims
- integrity refers to the way that the research is conducted. there is a genuine search for knowledge and understanding, the research is conducted honestly, and the results are distributed regardless of outcome
beneficence/non-maleficence
definition
- the potential benefits of research need to outweigh the risks
- the benefits of the research may accrue to people other than those involved in the study
- the risks involved in some studies is great, what is important is that the risks are considered, minimised and clearly explained
respect
definition
- respect people involved in research including: their welfare, beliefs, cultural heritage, perceptions and customs
- respect the capacity people have to make their own decisions about participation
- respect people unable to make their own decisions, empower them to be as involved as possible and protect them by involving people who can advocate on their behalf
informed consent
definiton
- participation in research is voluntary. due to respect for participants requires informed consent
- people need to be given enough information about the study to be able to decide whether to participate (the right to know what it involves)
- the effect of unequal power in relationships should be considered
- the need for informed consent may be waived in specific circumstances
types of consent
3
- specific: to a particular project
- extended: to future projects that are an extension of the present project or very similar
- unspecified: data and/or tissue (usually de-identified) may be used in any future research
justice
definition
- are inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study fair given the objectives of the research?
- are the burdens on participation on particular groups reasonable?
- is there fair access to the benefits of research?
should a patient participate in a randomised trial: uncertainty principle
randomisation is acceptable when the clinician-investigator is uncertain which of the randomised treatments is best for the patients
should a patient participate in a randomised trial: personal care principle
randomisation is acceptable when the clinician-investigator is indifferent between the randomised treatments for the patients
should a patient participate in a randomised trial:
‘clinical equipoise’
randomisation is acceptable when there is no consensus within the clinical community as to which of the randomised treatments is best for the patient