Phonophoresis Flashcards

1
Q

Phonophoresis =

A

US is used to deliver a medication via a safe, painless, noninvasive technique
(Usually anti-inflammatory/analgesics)

Opens pathways to drive molecules into the tissues (acoustical streaming)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Less likely to damage/burn skin vs ___

A

iontophoresis (which uses electrical current to drive medications)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

___ the area may enhance delivery of medication

A

Preheating

= Encourages vascular absorption & distribution of meds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Some medications are poor ___

A

conductors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

common drugs used with phonophoresis:

A

hydrocortisone
dexamethasone
benzydamine
salicylates
various anesthetics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

effectiveness of phonophoresis is largely based on the theory of:

A

diffusion through the skin, as described by Fick’s Law

substances (like medications) move from an area of higher concentration (on the skin’s surface) to an area of lower concentration (into the underlying tissues)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How Ultrasound Enhances Diffusion (Physiological Enhancement):

A

Increase in Metabolic Rate
Enzymatic Activity
Increased Cellular Permeability
Ion Flux
Enhanced Diffusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Increase in Metabolic Rate:

A

raises the temperature of tissues, which can increase local metabolic rates

enhances the absorption and activity of enzymes involved in the transport of medications through skin layers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Enzymatic Activity:

A

increasing tissue temperature and micro-massage effects

facilitating the breakdown and transport of the drug across the skin barrier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Increased Cellular Permeability:

A

drug molecules to pass through more easily

mechanical effects of ultrasound, such as acoustic streaming, create micro-channels or openings that allow medication to diffuse deeper into the tissues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ion Flux:

A

increases the movement of ions across cell membranes

enhances the penetration of the medication but also may facilitate cellular uptake of the drug once it crosses the skin barrier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Enhanced Diffusion:

A

improves the diffusion coefficient of the medication

increasing its movement across the skin by lowering the barrier resistance

direct effect of the acoustic energy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Increased Efficacy of Topical Medications:

A

increasing the skin’s permeability and the overall tissue’s ability to absorb the medication

(e.g., anti-inflammatory or analgesic creams)

drugs can reach the targeted tissues more effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Enhanced Drug Transport:

A

effects on cellular permeability, enzyme activity, and ion flux help create an environment where the drug can more easily penetrate and reach deeper tissues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Medication Preparation:

A

typically prepared in a 1-5% solution

then blended with an ultrasonic gel (which acts as the coupling medium), ensuring that the ultrasound waves can pass efficiently into the skin and tissues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ultrasound Parameters:

A

Continuous Ultrasound: when thermal effects are needed to facilitate drug delivery and promote tissue healing
Applied at 1 MHz for deeper tissues (greater than 2.5 cm depth) or at 3 MHz for more superficial tissues (less than 2.5 cm depth)

Pulsed Ultrasound: goal is to achieve non-thermal effects (e.g., reducing inflammation or enhancing drug absorption without raising tissue temperature)
- preferred in conditions like chronic inflammation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Treatment time is ____

A

1 min/sq. cm area

if the treatment area is 10 cm², the total treatment duration would be around 10 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Intensity is =

A

.8-1.5 w/sq.cm (pulsed or cont.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Treatment duration =

A

is usually 7-10 days at once per day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Patient Safety & Monitoring:

A

Minimal Side Effects:
little to no skin irritation

Less risk of burns or skin damage compared to iontophoresis

21
Q

Monitoring for Adverse Reactions:
Clinician must observe the patient for any signs of:

A

Allergic reaction to the medication.

Skin burns (especially with continuous ultrasound at higher intensities).

Redness, irritation, or discomfort at the treatment site.

22
Q

Can be used alongside other therapeutic modalities to maximize treatment outcomes:

A

Heat therapy (hot packs, warm compresses)

Range of Motion (ROM) exercises

Therapeutic Exercise (TherEx) optimize function.

Massage

Joint Mobilization

23
Q

w/ Heat therapy (hot packs, warm compresses) →

A

Increases circulation, enhances drug penetration

24
Q

w/ Range of Motion (ROM) exercises →

A

Helps maintain/improve joint mobility

25
w/ Therapeutic Exercise (TherEx) →
Can be incorporated post-treatment to optimize function
26
w/ Massage →
May complement the effects of phonophoresis by increasing local circulation
27
w/ Joint Mobilization →
Used in conjunction with phonophoresis for musculoskeletal conditions
28
Key Factors in Evaluating Ultrasound Evidence
Quality of Evidence Defining Evidence
29
Quality of Evidence:
The strength of research studies varies based on factors like study design, sample size, and control measures High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence
30
Defining Evidence:
Evidence should be based on significant improvements in measured outcome variables (e.g., pain reduction, tissue healing, functional improvement) Outcomes should be clinically meaningful, not just statistically significant
31
Challenges in Research on Therapeutic Ultrasound:
lack detailed descriptions of ultrasound parameters, making comparisons difficult Treatment dosage and area size must be clearly defined for meaningful analysis Variability in application (e.g., frequency, intensity, duration, duty cycle) complicates drawing definitive conclusions
32
Ultrasound for Painful Conditions:
Myofascial Pain Back Pain Shoulder Pain
33
Myofascial Pain
Some benefit for pain relief, but evidence is conflicting regarding its ability to increase pain threshold. No strong evidence supporting its effect on cervical range of motion (ROM).
34
Back Pain
Mixed findings in the literature. Some studies suggest a potential benefit, while others show no significant effect. No definitive conclusions on its overall effectiveness.
35
Shoulder Pain
Thermal ultrasound: Insufficient evidence to support its use. Pulsed (nonthermal) ultrasound: No evidence supporting effectiveness.
36
US for Inflammatory Conditions
Lateral epicondylitis Carpal tunnel syndrome Calcific tendonitis Bursitis Arthritis
37
Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)
Lack of strong evidence supporting the use of thermal or nonthermal ultrasound. Other treatments such as eccentric exercises, manual therapy, and bracing may be more effective.
38
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) (Refer to Clinical Practice Guidelines - CPG)
Pulsed ultrasound may help reduce inflammation and improve nerve conduction in mild to moderate CTS. High-intensity continuous ultrasound is NOT recommended due to the risk of nerve irritation or damage.
39
Calcific Tendonitis
Evidence supports thermal ultrasound for reducing pain and improving function. However, treatment parameters vary widely, making it difficult to establish standardized protocols.
40
Carpal tunnel US: High-quality, controlled studies on the effects of both thermal and pulsed ultrasound in individuals with CTS are needed.
Based on the results of 2 level II randomized studies, thermal ultrasound has not been shown to be better than sham ultrasound. Evidence on pulsed ultrasound is conflicting. Based on findings from studies where ultrasound was combined with other treatments, there is conflicting evidence on the benefit of adding nonthermal ultrasound to treatment regimens. Given the additional treatment expense and time commitment, there is not enough evidence for or against the use of nonthermal ultrasound in patients with mild to moderate CTS.
41
Bursitis
Questionable evidence for decreased pain, improved function, and ROM
42
Arthritis
Favorable evidence for pain reduction with less evidence for increased ROM and/or functional improvement
43
Ultrasound for: Soft Tissue
Used for dermal wounds Used for tissue extensibility Used for remodeling scar
44
Used for dermal wounds
Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) Conflicting evidence for wound healing
45
Used for tissue extensibility
Evidence from varied applications Conflicting outcomes Showed insufficient US energy
46
Used for remodeling scar
Insufficient evidence for US
47
Phonophoresis
Use of US to enhance delivery of topical agents through the skin “Pushing” molecules and increased permeability Poor evidence for either mechanism - Effect likely related to thermal effect of US Insufficient evidence to support phonophoresis in lieu of other approaches
48
Low-intensity pulsed US (LIPUS)
Delivery of pulsed, medium frequency US at very low intensity Increases bone angiogenesis, stimulates osteogenesis, and enhances production of calcified bone matrix Uses stationary applicator
49
Low-intensity pulsed US (LIPUS) Primary clinical use:
Delayed or recalcitrant bone healing Bone-tendon junction repair