Philosophy Of Science Flashcards

1
Q

Describe a priori justification.

A

If the justification can be deduced without depending on new observations or experiences, associated with rationalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe a posteriori justification.

A

If the justification requires new observations, associated with empiricism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which style of logic creates an idea which was not in the premises?

A

Inductive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the key assumption of positivism?

A

There is a single context free “reality,” allowing for generalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the key assumption of logical positivism?

A

A statement about reality is either true or false, shown by definition or by induction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give the stages of the hypothetico-deductive method.

A

Add ‘new’ idea into premises, deduce a prediction, try to falsify it using empirical observation and try to prove that the conclusion of your deduction was wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is it logical positivism or Popper’s hypothetico-deductive method that begins with observation, then induced a postulated theory?

A

Logical positivism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is it logical positivism or Popper’s hypothetico-deductive method that begins with a hypothesis,, then deducts a predicted observation?

A

Popper’s hypothetico-deductive method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 sets of theories in Duhem-Quine hypothesis?

A

The substantive theory, auxiliary theories required by the substantive theory and auxiliary theories linked to our interpretation of and belief in our results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give the formal name for the “truth-likeness” of a theory.

A

Verisimilitude.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe an incomplete theory.

A

A theory that is true in part but fails some tests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe a false theory.

A

A theory with no “truth-likeness.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Summarise Serlin and Lapsley’s “good enough” principle.

A

Aspects of a theory can be falsified without the whole theory being rejected, particularly is the “good enough” margins were clear a priori.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe stage 1 of Kuhnian science.

A

Pre-science: Many competing schools of thought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe stage 2 of Kuhnian science.

A

Normal science: A paradigm is accepted and not directly challenged, a ‘puzzle solving’ stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the anomalies stage of Kuhnian science.

A

A build up of data that can’t be explained by the paradigm.

17
Q

Describe stage 3 of Kuhnian science.

A

Crisis: Acceptance that the current paradigm is no longer viable and needs to be replaced.

18
Q

Describe stage 4 of Kuhnian science.

A

Revolution: Subjective and objecting rules determine which competing, new, incommensurables paradigm dominates.

19
Q

Briefly describe the structure of Lakatos’ research programme.

A

A stable core, protected by a changeable auxiliary belt.

20
Q

Describe the progression of Lakatos’ science.

A

Several competing programmes, refinement of some and dropping of some, new programmes and further refinement, refinement of some and dropping of some.

21
Q

Give the main aims of Laudan’s research traditions.

A

To maximise solved empirical problems and minimise anomalous and conceptual problems.

22
Q

What does Laudan argue is better than universality of method?

A

Heterogeneity of method: Use any method or combination thereof that realised the aim.

23
Q

Give 3 key points about positivist science.

A

It believes science is objective, cumulative and has only one “truth.”

24
Q

Give 3 key points about relativist science.

A

It believes that subjectivity and interpretation in science is inevitable, that science is a project of individual and social influences and that there is no single, absolute truth.

25
Q

Briefly describe 3 limits of relativistic science.

A

It is not generalisable, it doesn’t allow for predictions and it invalidates incremental science.