Philosophy of Ethics: Exam 1 Flashcards
What does it mean to say that a creature has “moral status?
the human or the animal is valuable IN ITSELF. we should treat in that way for its own sake. if you don’t hurt animals because they might hurt humans or something else etc, then you don’t believe that animals have moral status
Some people who believe that animals should not be treated with unnecessary cruelty nevertheless do not believe that animals have moral status. Be able to explain at least two reasons why such a person might still hold that we ought to treat animals well.
1) One might believe that it’s wrong to hurt animals because it could ultimately harm humans. Believing the animal is someone else’ property, and hurting the animal hurts someone else’s property.
2) Mistreating an animal not because the person thinks the animal has moral status but because it is against the persons moral philosophy to treat any other creature wrongly because one’s actions reflect on ones’ own person. Or a vice of cruelty which harms the person.
Moral Status Sense:
1) Moral status sense:
Saying a being has rights is saying the being has moral status.
“Animals have at least some moral status. Animals do not exist solely for human use, so they should be treated well for their own sake.”
Equal-consideration sense:
2) Equal-consideration sense:
The means that animal rights are equal to human rights.
“We must give equal moral weight to humans’ and animals’ comparable interests. Animal suffering matters as much as human suffering.”
Utility-trumping sense:
3) Utility trumping sense:
The vital interest in question must be protected even when protecting it might be disadvantageous to society as a whole.
“Like humans, animals have certain vital interests that we must not override (with few if any exceptions) even in an effort to maximize utility for society. For example, animals have a right to liberty, meaning we should not harmfully confine them even if doing so would predictably bring about many benefits.”
Strong animal-rights view.
Two reasons why a person might deny that animals deserve rights in the equal-consideration sense:
1) Inegalitarians would claim we are Different species from animals. His Response: How can we justify that our own species is superior to one that is so closely related to our own? We are connected to larger groups and classifications of the animal kingdom
2) our moral feelings tell us that it is worse to kill humans than animals. He denies that this is less morally problematic and says there is nothing absurd or unreasonable about equal consideration for animals.
Laws of nature:
laws/rules/circumstances that I did not choose, but that control me in some way: genetics, physics
Laws of freedom:
laws/rules that I freely choose for myself. allows free will.
Maxim:
a personal rule that one uses to guide his own actions
Universal Law:
a rule that can be applied to everyone
Does Kant believe that an action is right or wrong depending on (1) the motive of the action, or (2) the results the action produces? Be able to explain.
1) Motivation/intention should be used in making ethical decisions. One should use their free will to make the decision. One should not be motivated or compelled by Laws of Nature. We are not machines.
According to Kant, why must a person’s actions be guided by the laws of freedom (rational reflection) if they are to be good; in other words, why couldn’t a choice governed by feelings, desires, or instincts be good?
Feelings etc stem from laws of nature, controlling us in some sort of way. If we allowed that to control us we’d be programmed of sorts. We should base our decisions on intention based off of duty.
Why does Kant think that our laws of freedom must be imperatives, i.e., commands?
so that one can rationally decide what his duty is. ethics is about using free will.
CI:
“I ought never to act except in such a way that I can will that my maxim should become a universal law”
Steps of the CI:
1) Formulate your maxim.
2) Formulate the universal law.
3) Imagine a world where everyone followed this law.
4) Does a contradiction arise in the world?