Philosophy Flashcards
Define solipsism
Belief that only I myself and my own experiences are real, while anything else-a physical object or another person is nothing more than an object of my consciousness.
Define epistemology
Branch of philosophy that investigates the possibility, origins, nature and extent of human knowledge.
Define metaphysics
Metaphysics is the study that is concerned with providing a comprehensive account of the most general features of reality as a whole. The study of being as such.
Define rationalism
Reliance on reason, not experience as the only reliable source of human nature
Define argument
A collection of two or more propositions, all but one of which are the premises, which are supposed to provide inferential support for the truth of the remaining one.
Define premise
A statement whose truth is to infer that of others.
Define skepticism
Belief that some or all human knowledge is impossible.
Define determinism
Belief that since each momentary state of the world entails all of its future States and it must be possible to offer an explanation for everything that happen. All events occur outside of will and is already pre determined.
Define free will
A philosophical term for a capacity of rational agents to choose a course of action from among various alternatives.
What is a deterministic universe.
Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision and action, is the inevitable and necessary consequence of previous states of affairs.
More strictly, determinism should be distinguished from pre-determinism, the idea that the entire past (as well as the future) was determined at the origin of the universe.
Is the universe completely deterministic?
It is impossible to tell for sure if the universe is in fact deterministic or not. Humans believe and have the illusion of free will, where we believe any choice or action that we make is our own and that we can do anything we want. Despite this it is possible that every action we may ever take and that we believe was taken under free will had already been predicted and the action we took was just playing out as it is supposed too.
Do humans have free will?
Many humans believe to live under the illusion of free will, but it is not possible to understand if we do or do not have free will. It is argued that humans do have their own free will and are able to make their own choices, decisions and take actions and do freely. They believe that every choice is their own and that every decision was made by themselves. However it is possible that every action we take can be explained and predicted by our environment and people around us and that we are just playing out scenes of an already predicted future. Because of our environment around us, it can be predicted how it will be changed and how everything around us will change thus affecting the decisions made by a person.
Two theories of personal identity?
- Identities, are built up from memories of their own sensory experiences, as well as our reflections on these experiences. This can be objectified as experiences do not exhaust knowledge from our memories.
- Central to many religious beliefs, it is thought that we may be born with a soul that defines and makes up our identity from our time of birth to our time of death.
Is there a constant which gives us indentity?
There is yet to be a proven constant for our identity. It is thought that our memories give us our identities, but they often change over the course of time. It is also thought that the environment and people around us could influence our identity but as they are constantly changing as well it is not a constant.
Is time travelling backwards in time possible?
Time travelling backwards is impossible because it creates so many paradoxes and contradictions such as
The Grandfather Paradox: Can a person who has traveled to the past kill his or her own grandfather?
The Self-Visitation Paradox: Can a person visit himself or herself? How can there be two of one person at once?
The Nowhere Argument: If only the present moment exists, how could we travel to the past or the future?
The Double-Occupancy Problem: Can a person time travel backwards in time without colliding with him- or herself?
What is the tripartite definition of knowledge?
The tripartite definition of knowledge is perhaps the oldest accepted definition of knowledge. The tripartite definition holds that knowledge is justified true belief. The purpose of the tripartite definition is to provide an adequate account of our conception of what knowledge is. Truth, knowledge or belief.
Plato forms (ideas)
Plato believed that the same point could be made with regard to many other abstract concepts: even though we perceive only their imperfect instances, we have genuine knowledge of truth, goodness, and beauty no less than of equality. Things of this sort are the Platonic Forms, abstract entities that exist independently of the sensible world.
Descartes doubting the existence of the physical world
First, Descartes noted that the testimony of the senses with respect to any particular judgment about the external world may turn out to be mistaken. Second, Descartes raised a more systematic method for doubting the legitimacy of all sensory perception. Since my most vivid dreams are internally indistinguishible from waking experience, he argued, it is possible that everything I now “perceive” to be part of the physical world outside me is in fact nothing more than a fanciful fabrication of my own imagination. Finally, then, Descartes raises even more comprehensive doubts by inviting us to consider a radical hypothesis derived from one of our most treasured traditional belief
What can Descartes not doubt?
I think therefore I am. It does not. Descartes claimed that one thing emerges as true even under the strict conditions imposed by the otherwise universal doubt: “I am, I exist” is necessarily true whenever the thought occurs to me. This truth neither derives from sensory information nor depends upon the reality of an external world, and I would have to exist even if I were systematically deceived. For even an omnipotent god could not cause it to be true, at one and the same time, both that I am deceived and that I do not exist. If I am deceived, then at least I am.
What is Descartes argument for the existence of God
He stated (1) Our idea of God is of a perfect being, (2) it is more perfect to exist than not to exist, (3) therefore, God must exist.