Phil Exam Review Flashcards
Pink- Ethics Module Thinkers Orange- Concept Yellow- Term Green- Person Blue- Theory
Plato (context: Classical Greek City-States experimenting with political systems)
The main point—one should have a balanced character (and avoid the pitfalls of the four unbalanced ones he describes); it will make you more likely to do the right thing
- Balanced character is “philosopher king,” ruled by reason
- Unbalanced ones are oligarchic (rule by appetites); timarchic (rule by spirit); tyrannical (rule by a “master” passion); and democratic (rule by nothing,
i.e. without coherence)
Bentham (context: The Enlightenment)
Main point—develops Utilitarianism—goal: “greatest happiness for the greatest number”
- he believes human nature is to be selfish, so we must set up the laws (sanctions) so that selfish pursuit leads to utilitarian goals; in other words, harness the power of self-interest for the good of society
- connection with modern conservative political thought
Nietzche (context: the late 19th-century dominance of science, still increasing today
Main point—we need to embrace our “will to power,” which should involve discarding unselfishness and humility, often based on religion (which will become less and less important anyway—as he dramatically put it, “God is dead”)
- distinguishes between 3 types of societies: herd ones (mindlessly follow tradition or fashion), slave ones (are jealous and embittered), and master societies (chart their own course, and are not afraid to be powerful)
- concept of the Superman as an ideal for humanity
- notion of transforming your life into a work of art
Mill (context: early Industrial Revolution poverty)
Main point—modifies Utilitarianism believing that human nature can become altruistic through character education, etc. so that utilitarian goals are the focus of effort, not a by-product of selfish effort
- also distinguishes between higher and lower pleasures
- connection with modern progressive & liberal political thought
Rand (context: the mid-20th century contest between individualism and collectivism (e.g. the Cold War))
Main point—altruism is actually inhumane, in several ways, and is often not rational at all, but rather based in…
- “neo-mysticism”—the treatment of at least partly non-rational non-religious ideas the same way that religious ones used to be treated by believers: accepting them on faith and refusing, sometimes angrily, to allow them to be subjected to serious critical review
- altruism and neo-mysticism often transform people into victims and parasites, or at least ask people to sacrifice in the name of “the good,” which is often defined by those who don’t sacrifice in the same way
Noddings (context: late-20th century feminism)
Main point—principles are inappropriate much of the time; an “ethics of care” should take precedence
- distinguishes between two ethical approaches that were traditionally/classically (and incorrectly) called “masculine” and “feminine”
- principles are illusory, since in practice they have so many exceptions; they can also drive us away from others
- concretization of ethical situations is key
- “the relation of natural caring” is at the core of her ethic
4 Things Associated with Metaphysics & Epistemology
People, Philosophies and Places
- Plato’s Metaphysical Epistemology
- Descartes/Cartesian rationalism
- The British Empiricists (more briefly)
- The Kantian Synthesis and Beyond.
Plato’s “Background”
- Plato’s Theory of Forms can be understood as a synthesis of the views of Heraclitus and Parmenides. He explains that the physical world is inconstant and always changing, as Heraclitus supposed, but that above the physical world is a world of Forms that is constant and unchanging, as Parmenides supposed.
Parmenides
- held that the multiplicity of existing things, their changing forms and motion, are but an appearance of a single eternal reality (“Being”), thus giving rise to the Parmenidean principle that “all is one.” From this concept of Being, he went on to say that all claims of change or of non-Being are illogical.
- change is an illusion - appearances change but not essense - which is later reflected in Plato’s Theory of Forms
Heraclitus
- Heraclitus argued for the idea that reality is impermanent, while Parmenides argued that reality is static. Parmenides also focused on using rationality to discern the nature of reality, as opposed to Heraclitus’ use of sensory experiences
- The central ideas of Heraclitus’ philosophy are the unity of opposites and the concept of change. He also saw harmony and justice in strife. He viewed the world as constantly in flux, always “becoming” but never “being”.
Plato’s Divided Line Theory
- an analogy that establishes and orders two realms of being that a person can think about. The intelligible realm is the realm of thought, and it ‘revolves’ around the form of the good.
- This is an analogy that Plato uses to distinguish among different forms of knowledge and truth. Plato’s basic division is between what is visible and what is intelligible (i.e., knowable, but not seen), with the visible portion smaller than the intelligible portion.
Plato’s Allegory of Caves
- The allegory delves into the philosophical thought of truth, and how those with different experiences or backgrounds may perceive it. The shadows on the wall of the cave are constantly changing, so there is no stability or consistency offered for those who bear witness to them—only a false reality
Plato’s Theory of Forms
- asserts that the physical realm is only a shadow, or image, of the true reality of the Realm of Forms. So what are these Forms, according to Plato? The Forms are abstract, perfect, unchanging concepts or ideals that transcend time and space; they exist in the Realm of Forms.
Descartes’ Work Historical Context
- La géométrie, includes his application of algebra to geometry from which we now have Cartesian geometry. His work had a great influence on both mathematicians and philosophers.
- The World and Discourse on Method
Descartes’ Systematic Doubt
- the tools he borrowed from math for this and what he went through in the process itself–how and why he “tore things down” and began to “build them up again
- Cartesian doubt is a systematic process of being skeptical about (or doubting) the truth of one’s beliefs, which has become a characteristic method in philosophy. Additionally, Descartes’ method has been seen by many as the root of the modern scientific method
- Cartesian skepticism, methodic doubt, methodological skepticism, universal doubt, systematic doubt, or hyperbolic doubt