Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Philosophy > PHIL 335 Final > Flashcards

PHIL 335 Final Flashcards

1
Q

One Shot Prisoner Dilemma

A

Defection is the most rational strategy because no mater what the other party does, you will secure a better payoff by defecting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Iterated Prisoners Dilemma

A

There are several rounds/plays of the game and participants can gain a reputation (e.g. either reliable or dishonest) and that reputation may have an influence on what strategy a rational agent pursues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Bargaining Problem

A

What system of contraints should be adopted by rational individual utility maximizers in order to secure mutual advantage?

E.g. individual rights and principle of distribution of the benefits of cooperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Compliance problem

A

What justification is there for rational individual utility maximizers to comply with moral constraints?

Why be moral?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Contrasts between Compliance and Bargaining problem

A
  • Compliance problem not a central issue for kantians, contractualists and utilitarians

-Bargaining problem arises in highly qualified way for Rawlsian contractualists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hobbesian Contractarianism

A

Emphasizes the normative primacy of self-interest and the fundamentality of morality as an artificial device for facilitating mutual advantage

Contractualism, Kantianism and U adopt IMPARTIALIST conception of morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Straightforward Maximizer

A

A person who seeks to maximize his utility given the strategies of those with whom he interacts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Constrained Maximizer

A

A person who seeks in some situations to maximize her utility given not the strategies but the utilities of those with whom she interacts

-conditional disposition to base actions on a joint strategy without considering whether some individual strategy would yield greater expected utility

-in PD a CM chooses to cooperate if given her estimate of whether or not her partner will choose to cooperate her own expected utility is greater than the utility she would expect from the non-cooperative outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Deliberative Justification

A

Humans represent preferences to ourselves and seek a way of resolving conflicts and making our preferences coherent

Initially most plausible principle for establishing coherence os a maximizing principle: we choose actions that will maximize satisfaction of our reflective preferences

Credible account of moral constraints must be reconciled with deliberative justification or moral constraints will lose their force/rational authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Foundational Crisis of Morality

A

Ordinary moral discourse suggests that morality is a system of justified constraints on how persons may satisfy their preferences

Constraints seem objective

Idea of objective value is problematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Foundational Crisis Solutions

A

Platonic challenge

Humean challenge

Autonomy of morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Platonic challenge

A

Properly understood morality does not impose constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Humean challenge

A

Morality rests on sympathetic feelings that are sufficiently strong to avert the crisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Autonomy of morality

A

Morality requires no non-moral justification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Solving Morality Foundational Crisis

A

Credible moral realism

Universalistic justification

Incorporate morality within deliberative justification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Credible moral realism

A

Provide compelling philosophical argument that values are objective and ontologically real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Universalistic justification

A

Develop a broadly Kantian conception of practical reason that goes beyond deliberative justification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Detecting Dispositions of Others
Identify and distinguish CM and SM

A

Opaque- opaque beings need Hobbesian/political solutions

Transparent- transparent beings can easily cooperate without political solutions

Translucent- translucent beings can employ moral solutions at least to some degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

State of Nature

A

Life without morality

A state of affairs when there is no constraint on actions

A state of absolute liberty in which the benefits of cooperation are absent and in which people ruthlessly compete for resources

A state in which people are motivated by (unconstrained) self-interest and not fully rational desires for glory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

State of Nature (features)

A

Natural Moral status
- human beings have no inherent worth/moral standing, value of a person is a function of power as judged by others
Relative scarcity
- the resources available for the satisfaction of human desires are scarce
Competition
- human beings compete for the scarce resources
Significance of power
- human beings attempt to acquire power that facilitates desire satisfaction and is conducive to self-preservation
Rough Natural equality
- humans are equal in the sense that no individual can reliably dominate others and gain advantage
Morality and Justice as artificial
- prior to the establishment of the commonwealth there are no binding constraints on the liberty of individuals
Rationality
- individuals can be guided by reason to advance their self preservation
Irrationality
- some individuals suffer from rational failings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Position of the Fool in Leviathan

A

The fool says that there is no thing as justice and how can it be against reason to break contracts when it is impossible to receive hurt by it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Causes of conflict in the State of Nature

A

Competition - equal hope of obtaining something

Diffidence - lack of trust, no one can secure themselves

Glory- some people will create conflict for glory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Hobbes Laws of Nature

A
  1. Rational agents seek peace
  2. It is mutually advantageous for individuals to scale back on our unlimited rights and accept less freedom
  3. People/rational agents should live up to their covenants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Hobbesian Contractarianism (in depth)

A

There are no natural or objective moral principles

Views morality as a system of constraints on the pursuit of individual utility maximization that rational egoists can endorse

Human life in the absence of extensive and sustained forms of cooperation is generally very poor

Morality is invented by humans in order to achieve mutual advantage

The quality of life for individuals in the absence of morality must be sufficiently poor to warrant establishment of constraints

The establishment and maintenance of constraints must be possible for individuals who are initially not bound by such constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Hobbesian Contractualism vs. Contractarianism
Contractualism- premised upon a rejection of rational egoism - grounded in an ideal of mutual justification linked to reasonable rejection A proposed moral principle is acceptable only if no one can reasonably reject the principle Contractarianism- embraces a complex variety of rational egoism - grounded in an ideal of mutual advantage rooted in maximizing conception of individual rationality Appropriate moral principles are ones that rational self-interested agents can agree to in order to facilitate mutual advantage
26
Kants objectives in the Groundwork
1. Seek out supreme principle of morality 2. Establish/prove the supreme principle of morality Extra: Show that the categorical imperative is an a priori principle
27
Good Will and its Value
The good will is unconditionally valuable, the only thing that is good without limitation Rules out, talents of the mind, self control (qualities of temperament), gifts of fortune as all these things combined with a bad will lead to evil
28
Moral worth of actions
Only actions performed for the sake of duty have true moral worth Note: moral worth is not equivalent to moral rightness
29
Objections to Kants doctrine of moral worth
1. Perversity objection 2. Austerity objection 3. Denigration of sentiment objection
30
Perversity objection
Isn’t it perverse to suppose that morally worthy actions must be performed contrary to a persons inclinations Barons reply: objection relies on a misinterpretation of Kant, inclinations of pleasure to do ones duty can be present but they cannot ground action with moral worth
31
Austerity objection
Kants view seems to deny that taking pleasure in doing ones duty contributes something of value. It seems needlessly austere. Barons response: deflect force of objection by noting that Kant holds that a sense of satisfaction should accompany the performance of dutiful action
32
Denigration of Sentiment Objection
Kants doctrine seems to denigrate the value of natural sentiments that align with moral demands Barons reply: Kants doctrine is plausible since grounding moral action in mere sentiment is not as attractive as it might initially seem
33
Barons Reply to denigration objection
Reflective commitment - persons are deliberative agents for whom deciding how to act is a matter of reflection on ones reasons for action Unreliability of sentiments - natural sentiments are not always reliably connected with right action
34
Perfect duties
Perfect duties are those that moral agents always have to perform, regardless of external circumstances. An example is honesty; dishonest behavior is never permissible un- der any circumstances.
35
Imperfect duties
imperfect duties are prescriptions of general ends, and fulfilling them is praiseworthy. Imperfect duties are requirements for attitudes and associated actions that fulfill some moral maxim, but that have practical limitations.
36
Duties to self
includes attention to personal health, safety, and well-being, preserving one's wholeness of character and integrity, maintaining competence, and continuing personal and professional growth
37
Duties to others
together with the distinction between perfect and imperfect duties, Kant recognized four categories of duties: perfect duties toward ourselves, perfect duties toward others, imperfect duties toward ourselves and imperfect duties toward others
38
Different formulations of the categorical imperative
Formula of Universal Law Formula of Humanity Formula of Autonomy
39
Formula of Universal Law
Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become universal law
40
Formula of humanity
Act in such a way that you treat humanity whether in your own person or in the person of another always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means
41
Formula of Autonomy
The idea of the will of every rational being as a will that legislates universal law - rational beings are the source of moral law -moral law is not externally imposed and yet it is the same for all rational beings
42
Correspondence thesis
Perfect duties correspond to contradiction of conception Imperfect duties correspond to contradiction of will
43
Contradiction in conception
Violations associated with violations of perfect duties either to oneself or others
44
Contradiction in will
These failures are associated with violations of imperfect duties either to oneself or others
45
Distinction between dignity and price
1. Price- something that has a price may be exchanged for something else of equal or greater value; value is relative 2. Dignity- beyond all price; may not be exchanged or sacrificed for anything else
46
Possible difficulties with the CI
Rigorism False negatives False positives
47
Rigorism
Does a Kantian conception of morality yield an unduly strict and inflexible understanding of moral duties?
48
False Positives
Application of FUL to some maxims suggests that some plainly immoral behaviour is morally permissible Maxim of making a false promise to a specific person
49
False Negatives
Application to FUL to some maxims suggests that some plainly morally permissible behaviour is wrong In order to avoid crowded tennis courts I will play Sunday mornings Action fails practical interpretation of FUL
50
Hypothetical Imperative
A directive of reason that link ends with means by describing the best strategy/means for achieving a given end If you want this desired end you OUGHT to do this Problematic -directives of reason grounded on a contingent end that a rational agent can have Assertoric -directives of reason given an end that can be attributed to all rational agents
51
Categorical Imperative
A directive of practical reason that guides the will not in relation to contingent ends of an agent but by constraining the will unconditionally Sets constraints on the pursuit of ends and these constraints have authority for agents Applies to all rational agents A command, must be followed
52
Issue concerning subject matter of morality
What account of the subject matter of morality adequately explains its objectivity in a way compatible with its epistemically and motivational elements? A philosophical account of morality’s basic subject matter is not identical to a normative theory of morality
53
Normative Utilitarianism
Morality is best understood as concerned with the maximization of aggregate well-being
54
Philosophical Utilitarianism
Subject matter of morality concerns individual well-being -objective -epistemically sensible -motivationally power
55
The Losers example
Suppose there is one way rational way to live and that would be A Does it follow that no one could reject A? Suppose the people who’s situation is rlly bad under A are losers There is an alternative E where no ones situation would be as bad Losers have a reasonable complaint against A
56
Losers relation to normative utilitarianism and Contractualism
Utilitarianism holds that significant sacrifices of some individuals can be morally justified if such sacrifices are conducive to the maximization of aggregate well-being. Contractualism account of the subject matter of morality does not lend supposer to normative utilitarianism
57
Challenges to Contractualism associated with aggregation
Contractualism can offer an intuitively attractive analysis of what is wrong about some cases in which maximizing aggregate well-being seems wrong It is not clear whether the Contractualist approach to capturing the significance of the numbers is successful or illuminating Boat and island example
58
Sex vs gender
Sex is a biological distinction between males and females Gender is a socially constructed phenomenon in which various traits and capacities are attributed to biological males and females and often represented as deep facts about the essential difference between men and women
59
False consciousness
A complex set of beliefs held by a person about their interests, obligations or rights which are distorted in the that the beliefs do not accurately represent the persons true interests, actual obligations or actual rights.
60
Feminist conclusion requirement
Achieve a theoretical understanding of womens oppression with the purpose of finding a route to ending womens oppression
61
Womens experience requirement
Develop an account of morality which is based upon womens moral experiences
62
Rights Debate
Background Struggle for rights since the dawn of time Male stream accounts of rights do not capture woman’s interests or perspectives AGAINST - concept of rights rest on an excessively individualistic conception of the self as independent, rational, autonomous -rights discourse gives an unduly narrow and rigid account of the responsibilities people have to one another FOR - rights can illuminate and protect the distinct claims/interests of vulnerable persons in oppressive relationships -rights can be used to structure mutually respectful relationships between people -discourse of rights need not be corrosive to affective ties between persons
63
Ubuntu
Roughly means humanness A person is a person through other persons Favoured interpretation An action is right just insofar as it produces harmony and reduces discord, an act is wrong to the extent that it fails to develop community
64
Reflective equilibrium
A compelling interpretation must - fit with the paradigmatic reflective judgements that people make -provide an articulation of the core ethical principle that gives content to Ubuntu without generating obviously problematic results

Philosophy (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions