Phenomenology Flashcards
Brief Description of Phenomenology
A Phenomenological study describes the common meaning for several individuals of their lived experiences of a concept or phenomenon. Phenomenologists focus on describing what all participants have in common as they experience a phenomenon. The basic purpose of phenomenology is to reduce individual experiences with a phenomenon of a description of the universal essence (“a grasp of the very nature of the thing.” Van Manen, 1990).
Phenomenology describes ___ they experienced and ___ they experienced it.
This description consists of “what” they experienced and “how” they experienced it (Moustakas, 1994; Creswell & Poth, 2018).
Is phenomenology a philosophy or a method or both?
Phenomenology is both a philosophy and method. Phenomenology does not endeavor to develop a theory to explain the world; rather the goal is to develop deeper insight to help maintain greater contact within the world (Van Manen, 1990, 2016).
Philosophical roots of phenomenology
Philosophy is the foundation of this type of research. It is rooted in the philosophical perspectives of Husserl (1859-1938) and subsequent philosophical discussions by Heidegger (1889-1976) and Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961).
What are the two main philosophies of phenomenology?
There are two main philosophies: (1) Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology (founded as traditional/classical phenomenology), which is descriptive and (2) Heidegger’s Hermeneutic phenomenology, which moves from descriptive to interpretive. (Heidegger was a pupil of Husserl.) In Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology, bracketing is a key process.
What is the theoretical framework for phenomenology?
The theoretical framework is always phenomenology. A secondary theoretical framework (grounding philosophy or philosophical framework) can be used in hermeneutic phenomenology, but the research would be a hybrid and should be labeled as such.
How does transcendental phenomenology handle biases?
In transcendental phenomenology, biases are irrelevant; they should be set aside (bracketed) and should not be made explicit. Highlighting biases in transcendental phenomenology is counterintuitive to the process.
How are biases handled in hermeneutic phenomenology?
In hermeneutic phenomenology, the understanding is that biases cannot be set aside or bracketed, and therefore, they need to be recognized and later revised as new information is discovered.
Research focus of approach of phenomenology
Understand the essence of the experience/phenomenon
Unit of analysis of phenomenology
Studying several individuals who have shared the experience
Type of research problem best suited for phenomenology
Needing to describe the essence of the lived phenomenon
Nature of disciplinary origins of phenomenology
Drawings from philosophy, psychology, and education
Forms of data collection for phenomenology
Using primarily interviews with individuals, although documents, observations, and art may also be considered
Data collection tools: Interview protocols, journal questionnaires, document rubrics.
Which interview protocol is recommended for phenomenology?
A semistructured interview protocol is recommended, allowing researchers to construct interview questions relevant to the research question so that key aspects of the research study are sure to be covered while allowing for participants to discuss other information that may end up being relevant to the study. Semistructured interviews allow researchers to keep a balance between focusing on the research topic and allowing for a disciplined naturalness in phenomenological research (Giorgi, 1985).
Data analysis strategy for phenomenology
Analyzing data for significant statements, meaning units, textual and structural description, and description of the “essence”.