Pharmacotherapy vs medical devices for cardiovascular disorders Flashcards
Medicines:
- Pharmacological interventions involve the use of drugs to treat or manage conditions.
- They work through biochemical reactions that alter physiological processes at the cellular or molecular level.
- Drugs require absorption into the bloodstream to exert their effects.
- Often have systemic effects that can lead to side effects affecting multiple organs or systems.
Device-Based Therapies:
- Involve physical devices that are either implanted in the body or used externally to treat or manage conditions.
- Their primary mode of action is mechanical or electrical rather than biochemical.
- Devices provide targeted therapy, often localized to specific organs or tissues, potentially reducing systemic side effects.
- Examples include stents, pacemakers, and blood pressure monitors.
State the differences between medicines and device-based therapies
- Potential for procedural harm
- Still has side effects (sometimes severe)
- Not easily reversible (?)
- Potentially costly
- Relatively limited trial evidence
- Uncertain long-term effects
- Typically reserved for severe disease
- Different regulation!
Define Ischaemic heart disease
progressive build-up of atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries resulting in its narrowing and reduced blood flow to the heart muscle.
What is the current ‘device’ treatment for Ischaemic heart disease
Coronary artery stenting
What is Coronary artery stenting
involves the insertion of a balloon angioplasty. The balloon pushes the plaque and narrowing aside.
Briefly explain the evolution of Coronary artery stenting
Initially, involved the insertion of a balloon angioplasty. The balloon pushes the plaque and narrowing aside. However, there is still risk of recurrence of stenosis.
Bare-metal stents:
Then stents were developed to act as a ‘scaffold’ to keep the blood vessel/artery open after balloon angioplasty has cleared the blockage.
The stent prevents the artery from collapsing or closing again (re-stenosis) in the short-term. (reduced the risk of recurrence of stenosis)
However, there is still the risk of restenosis with inflammation cellular proliferation.
To counter-act this, drug-eluting stents were developed. These stents are coated with anti-proliferative drugs including paclitaxel, sirolimus, tacrolimus and dexamethasone.
Describe Drug-eluting stents (DES)
stents coated with anti-proliferative drugs including paclitaxel, sirolimus, tacrolimus and dexamethasone. The medication is slowly released to the surrounding arterial tissue with the aim of reducing inflammation and limiting the proliferation of smooth muscle cells that can lead to restenosis.
What are the limitations of drug-eluting stents?
Despite their effectiveness in reducing restenosis, drug-eluting stents have a downside. They can increase the risk of thrombosis. This can lead to acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction.
Furthermore, The combination of foreign body reaction and the anti-proliferative drugs can delay the healing and re-endothelialisation of the artery, leading to exposed stent struts that can trigger clot formation.
Due to the increased risk of thrombosis with drug-eluting stents, there is a need for prolonged use of antiplatelet medications. Drugs, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, help prevent platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in the stented artery.
Studies comparing stent-types and its findings
Studies comparing stent-types have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents result in a lower risk of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality.
While DES offers improved clinical outcomes, there is a trade-off due to the necessity for prolonged use of antiplatelet medications, which carry associated side effects.
Who do DES stents benefit (patient population)
DES stenting may have greater benefits in patients with more ‘severe; conditions such as left anterior descending (LAD) artery and/or left main disease. This subgroup typically faces a higher risk of adverse outcomes, and the enhanced efficacy of DES in these patients underscores its importance in managing complex coronary artery disease.
The decision to use DES should consider patient-specific factors, including the risk of bleeding (which might complicate prolonged antiplatelet therapy) and the specific coronary anatomy involved.
State the Current standard therapies for heart failure
Implantable cardiac defibrillation, Cardiac resynchronisation therapy
What is Implantable cardiac defibrillation
Implantable cardiac defibrillation (ICDs): continuously monitor heart rhythms and deliver electrical shocks when detecting life-threatening arrythmias, to restore normal heart rhythm. (prevents the need for a defibrillator). This is a mini defibrillator that can deliver a shock to the heart when appropriate.
Rationale for implantable cardiac defibrillators in heart failure
Sudden Cardiac Death is a Major Concern due to potentially fatal arrhythmias
Persistence of arrhythmias despite β-blocker
Supporting evidence for ICD: Large-scale trials such as SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial) have demonstrated that ICDs significantly reduce the risk of death from arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic and ischemic heart failure.
Pharmacological options of reducing severe arrythmias such as amiodarone was found to have no effect on death rate. This evidence supports the use of ICDs in heart failure patients, particularly those with reduced ejection fraction who are at higher risk.
Adverse effects of implantable cardiac defibrillators
inappropriate shocks
device infection
potential lead failure.
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT)
CRT devices work by coordinating the timing of the left and right ventricles’ contractions, improving the efficiency of the heart’s pumping ability in patients with dysynchrony (delayed ventricular contraction/not at the same time).
By placing pacing wires in both right and left ventricles, pacing can cause synchronous contractions and can help improve overall left systolic function.
Describe the criteria for implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy
- Reduced LV ejection fraction (<35%, severe HF), and
- Dyssynchronous left and right ventricular contractions (or left bundle branch block with QRS >120ms), and
- Above despite taking maximally tolerated doses of medications known to have prognostic effects
(It is intended for patients with more ‘severe’ heart failure)
Describe how Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is proposed to improve outcomes for patients with severe heart failure
CRT has been shown to Improve symptoms, Reduce hospitalizations and decrease mortality in patients with heart failure (particularly those who exhibit specific patterns of electrical delay (QRS prolongation).
Adverse events of Cardiac resynchronisation therapy
lead dislodgement, infection, and, in some cases, lack of response to therapy (non-responders).
Describe LVAD
Left ventricular assist device
Describe significant risks and complications of LVAD
infection (on the device, this is difficult to treat)
Bleeding - due to the implantation of the device
Risk of devices: ICD and CRT
Risks include:
* Infections, Bleeding,
stroke, infection (on the device, this is difficult to treat), and device malfunction.
* Unintended therapy – sometimes the detection of arrythmias is not accurate and a defibrillating shock is delivered
procedures are typically undertaken with local anaesthesia. It requires the introduction of wires via veins into the heart.
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD)
LVADs are mechanical pumps implanted to help the left ventricle pump blood to the aorta and the rest of the body. Supports heart function and blood flow in patients with severe heart failure.