pharmacoeconomics Flashcards
Opportunity Cost
Spending is inevitable, choice is inevitaable
TIME, MONEY Constant need (for providers) to evaluate patient care choices and act on them
Patients Choice– Medication vs vacation
Pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research
Enhance quality of practice by aiding decision making.
Practitioner in driver seat (mitigates Marketing)
Sets practice priorities
Enhances practitioner position C payor payor
strong evaluation process
> delivery and value in patient care
Economics
How people choose to use scarce resources with alternative uses in provision of commodities for comsumption.
Value is goal of practice
3 A’s
Minimize cost/benefit ratio= creates value
best return on investment = value
Enhances ability to deliver product for > patient compliance
Acceptable clinical outcomes
Acceptable humanistic outcomes
Acceptable economic outcomes
Perspective Point of View
Provider - Outcomes
Patient -Outcomes, Price
Payor- Price, Outcomes
Society- Costs
Cost effectiveness
Use of scarce resources to get best value on market.
Cost effectiveness
Compares Drug to Drug
Cost of drug
_________ = Cost per unit of effect
Resulting effect
Cost per unit of effect
cost 160 x 0.40= decrease in LDL 64 PTS
cost /effectiveness = 160/64 = cost per unit of effect = 2.5 $ per each point decrease in LDL
Average cost effectiveness
Best value with outcomes met
Agent A average cost effectiveness
$1.00 per /unit
Agent B
$1.60 per /unit
Agent A best value with outcomes met.
Incremental cost effectiveness
Compares drug
other theraputic options
standard of care
no treatment ( placebo)
Incremental Cost effectiveness
(cost of option B) - (cost of option A)
_________________________________
(effect option B) - (effect option B)
= Cost to achieve 1 unit of effect
Option B crestor, Option A Pravastatin
120-4 116
_______ = ____ = $ 5.80 each unit of effect
60-40 20
Evaluate- t Option B crestor, Option A Pravastatin
Agent A -lower cost /effectiveness– decrease cost effectiveness of Agent B- Agent B is of poorer value
Pharmacoeconomic Literature evaluation
Evaluation
Quality of Journal Author qualification Title ? Abstract Un biased Study methodology Sponsorship ---question Bias Incremental results - conclusion &, differences in subgroups & degree uncertainty (allowance) could change conclusion.
Economice in NP workplace
POLICY
Formularyb decision making
BEDSIDE
Clinical decision making Acute and Chronic
KNOW Principle
Treatment of Pain secondary to OA
Pain =
significant disability
significant resource utiliaztion
(affects 15% of population & results in > 100,000 hospitalizations annually)
Treatment of pain secondary to OA (2)
Effective pain relief in OA NSAIDS 24-30% cheaper > non dyspeptic effects symptomatic ulcers, ulcer hemmorhage, & ulcer perforation Cox II Inhibitors > expense than generic NSAIDS < GI side effects
Treatment of pain secondary to OA (3)
Patient treatment? NSAIDS vs COX II Cost effectiveness prevention of GI Bleed? COX II = 15%,< dyspeptic s/s 50%< in ulcer complication Not all pts are at risk for GI bleed- justification of GI protection? ? Value related to extra cost
Treatment of pain secondary to OA (4)
< GI risk is valuable for patients with a hx of GI Bleed+ COx II
< risk of GI Bleed is not valuable for patients with without a hx of GI Bleed= NSAID