Pg 6 Flashcards
How do you challenge personal jurisdiction in federal court?
It is limited by the fifth amendment which requires an appropriate relationship to the United States, meaning the person must be domiciled there or have minimum contacts there. Federal courts are restricted by the FRCP when exercising personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants, but they have personal jurisdiction over defendants subject to general jurisdiction in the same state and to the same extent that state courts would have.
What is involved in FRCP 12b regarding personal jurisdiction?
Federal defendants can preserve their right to challenge personal jurisdiction by including an objection as an affirmative defense in the responsive pleading, or they can object by motion to dismiss under the FRCP. These supersede special appearance rules and allow more flexible ways to assert objections
If a person doesn’t raise an objection to personal jurisdiction in the answer or the initial motion in federal court, can they do it later?
No
What are the two major ways to object to personal jurisdiction?
– direct attack: Challenge jurisdiction in the rendering state
– collateral attack: Challenge jurisdiction in the enforcing state
What are the different ways you can challenge personal jurisdiction by direct attack?
This is done in the rendering state by any of the following:
– special appearance: challenge jx without submitting to the court’s jurisdiction just because you appeared.
– Federal rules: object to personal jx and raise other objections at the same time without submitting to the jurisdiction
– interlocutory appeal: some states allow an immediate appeal to an appellate court if jurisdiction objection is rejected. But federal courts don’t allow this and many state courts do not either
If you make a special appearance to directly attack personal jurisdiction, what is involved and what can you not do?
This means you challenge jx without submitting to the court’s jurisdiction just because you appeared. You cannot raise any issue going to the merits, otherwise you waive your objection and you voluntarily submit to the court’s jurisdiction
What is involved in objecting to personal jurisdiction under the federal rules?
You can object to personal jurisdiction and raise other objections at the same time without submitting to the jurisdiction. But if it is not at the same time, your objection is lost and you have submitted to the court’s jurisdiction
What is involved in the proper chain for a direct attack on personal jurisdiction?
- make an objection
– have a hearing on the issue
– if the court decides there was no basis for jurisdiction, then the claim is dismissed
– if the court decides there was a basis for jurisdiction, then proceed with the case by defending on the merits. - that will not waive your objection to jurisdiction, so if you lose, you can appeal claiming that the court did not have jurisdiction
What is involved in making a collateral attack on personal jurisdiction?
This is when you challenge jurisdiction in the enforcing court. This is an attack on the previous judgement once it is rendered. The Supreme Court doesn’t allow these. The defendant can challenge the original court’s jurisdiction in an enforcement action instead of directly in the original suit, but they cannot reopen the merits of the original case.
Does a collateral attack on personal jurisdiction mean that you can ignore a suit?
Yes because the judgement is unenforceable if there really was no jurisdiction.
Why is it dangerous to ignore a suit if you were objecting to personal jurisdiction?
Because if the court really does have jurisdiction, a default judgement gets entered against you and then you have missed your chance to defend on the merits
What does domesticating the judgement mean?
Once a plaintiff gets a money judgement against the defendant who ignored the suit, the plaintiff has to take it to the state where the defendant lives or has property and then get a court order from that state authorizing law-enforcement to sell the defendant’s assets to satisfy it
What are the two ways that you can domesticate a judgement?
– traditional procedure: file a new action on the judgement seeking judgement on the judgment
– registration procedure: file a certified copy of the judgement in the enforcing court and then there’s no need for a new suit
What is involved in the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution?
Courts must honour judgements of other states by entering judgement on them and letting out-of-state creditors use their courts to collect debts
What are the two major exceptions to the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution?
- a state can inquire if the rendering state had jurisdiction and refuse to enforce it if it didn’t
- you cannot challenge personal jurisdiction in an enforcement action if you already did it in the original action. If you fully litigate an issue in one action, you cannot re-litigate it in another