Pg 42 Flashcards
What is the common law rule against perpetuities?
No interest is good unless it must vest or fail not later than 21 years after some life in being at the creation of the interest [or the point when the interest becomes irrevocable]
Essentially what does RAP require?
All interests, whether they are in trust or otherwise, must vest or fail [in either interest or possession] within the lives of everyone who could possibly have been known to the donor [lives in being] plus the minority of the next generation [21 years]. Essentially within 21 years after the death of someone that was alive when the interest was created, the interest must definitely vest or fail to vest. If an interest does this, it is good.
What is the situation not to get tricked about with regard to RAP?
Sometimes an interest vests immediately but possession doesn’t until later. Don’t get tricked, because this interest has vested.
What is the date that RAP goes from?
– will: date of the testator’s death
– trust: date that the interest becomes irrevocable
What type of interest does RAP apply to?
Only future interests. This is for trusts and sequential property interests, but not for anything else. It only impacts contingent interests, because vested interests are fine.
What is the rationale behind RAP?
It is meant to prevent excessive control over the future destiny of property and to prevent future interests from vesting too far in the future. It limits how far out someone can control property.
What are the two basic purposes of RAP ?
- to prevent the tying up of land indefinitely
– to facilitate alienation
Where does RAP most often come up?
With regard to trusts
Under RAP, any interest that MIGHT not vest or fail within the perpetuities period is what?
Void from the outset, no matter how implausible the possibility
What are examples of things under RAP that make it so that the interest might not vest or fail within the perpetuities period, so they are void from the outset?
– fertile octogenarian
– unborn widow
– slothful executor
Who must the life in being be with regard to RAP?
Must be someone that is referenced in the document that is already alive when the interest is created [means either at the testator‘s death if it is a will or the time the interest became irrevocable if it is a trust).
For a life in being, do they have to be referenced expressly in the instrument that creates the interest?
No, they can be determined by implication if they were referenced implicitly in the instrument. The person doesn’t have to be named, but someone else must be able to determine whether anyone can be a life and being
What are requirements to be a life in being for RAP?
– must be alive when the interest is created (this can sometimes be a time later than when the document is executed)
– can be anyone, not just blood relatives
– any age is fine
For a revocable trust, at what point must the life in being actually be in being?
When the power to revoke terminates
What is the reasoning behind the 21 year portion of RAP?
The reasoning was that fathers were worried that property would be inherited by an incompetent or unworthy son. For living people, the father can pass judgment, but for unborn people that isn’t possible