PFR Reviewer Flashcards

1
Q

Article 2 of NCC

A

Effectivity of Laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Article 3 of NCC

A

Ignorance of the Law Excuses No one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Article 4 of NCC

A

Non-Retroactivity of Laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Article 5 of NCC

A

Acts Contrary to Laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Article 6 of NCC

A

Waiver of Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Article 7 of NCC

A

Repeal of Laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Article 8 of NCC

A

Judicial Decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Article 9 of NCC

A

Duty of Judges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Article 10 of NCC

A

Interpretation of Laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Article 11 & 12 of NCC

A

Customs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Article 13 of NCC

A

Rule on Periods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Article 14-18 of NCC

A

Conflict of Laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Article 19-21 of NCC

A

Human Relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Article 22 of NCC

A

Unjust Enrichment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Article 36 of NCC

A

Prejudicial Questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Article 37 of NCC

A

Civil Personality

17
Q

Article 40-43 of NCC

A

Natural Persons

18
Q

Article 44-47 of NCC

A

Juridical Persons

19
Q

Article 48 of NCC

A

Citizenship and Domicile

20
Q

Article 1 of Family Code of the Philippines

A

Article 1. Marriage is a special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and family life. It is the foundation of the family and an inviolable social institution whose nature, consequences, and incidents are governed by law and not subject to stipulation, except that marriage settlements may fix the property relations during the marriage within the limits provided by this Code.

21
Q

Article 2 of Family Code of the Philippines

A

Art. 2. No marriage shall be valid, unless these essential requisites are present:
(1) Legal capacity of the contracting parties who must be a male and a female; and
(2) Consent freely given in the presence of the solemnizing officer.

22
Q

Article 3 of Family Code of the Philippines

A

Art. 3. The formal requisites of marriage are:

(1) Authority of the solemnizing officer;

(2) A valid marriage license except in the cases provided for in Chapter 2 of this Title; and

(3) A marriage ceremony which takes place with the appearance of the contracting parties before the solemnizing officer and their personal declaration that they take each other as husband and wife in the presence of not less than two witnesses of legal age.

23
Q

Article 4 of Family Code of the Philippines

A

Art. 4. The absence of any of the essential or formal requisites shall render the marriage void ab initio, except as stated in Article 35 (2).

A defect in any of the essential requisites shall render the marriage voidable as provided in Article 45.

An irregularity in the formal requisites shall not affect the validity of the marriage but the party or parties responsible for the irregularity shall be civilly, criminally and administratively liable.

24
Q

Cases: NON-RETROACTIVITY OF LAWS

A

Lintag v. NAPOCOR
G.R No. 158609 July 27, 2007

25
Q

Case: REPEAL OF LAWS

A

Lledo v. Lledo AM No. P-95-1167 (Resolution) February 9,2010

26
Q

Case: JUDICIAL DECISIONS FORM PART OF
LEGAL SYSTEM / DOCTRINE OF
STARE DECISIS (ARTICLE 8)

A

Tala Realty v. Banco Filipino
G.R No. 181369 June 22, 2016

27
Q

Case: RULE ON PERIODS (ARTICLE 13)

A

CIR v. Primetown
G.R No. 162155 August 28, 2007

28
Q

Case: PROVISIONS ON CONFLICT OF LAW
(ARTICLE 14-18)

A
  1. Rupblic v. Manalo
    G.R No. 221029 April 24, 2018
  2. Testate Estate of Edward E. Christensen
    G.R No. L-16749 January 31, 1963
  3. EDI Staff Builders Int’l Inc. v. NLRC
    G.R No. 145587 October 26,2007
29
Q

Case: HUMAN RELATIONS (ARTICLE 19-21)

A

Pantaleon v. AMEX
G.R No. 174269 (Resolution) August 25, 2010

Wassmer v. Velez
G.R No. L-20089 December 26, 1964

Baksh v. CA
G.R No. 97336 February 19, 1993

30
Q

Case: PRINCIPLE OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT (ART 22)

A

Frenzel v. Catito
G.R No. 143958 July 11, 2003

31
Q

Case: PREJUDICIAL QUESTION (ART 36)

A

Sps Gaditano v. San Miguel Corp.
G.R No. 188767 July 24, 2013

32
Q

Case: CIVIL PERSONALITY (ARTI 37)

A

Geluz v. CA
G.R No. L-16439 July 20, 1961

33
Q

Case: JURIDICAL PERSONS (ARTICLE 44-47)

A

Roldan V. Philippine Veterans Board
G.R No. L-11973 June 30, 1959

Mendez v. People
G.R No. 179962 June 11, 2014

34
Q

Case: CITIZENSHIP

A

Poe v. Comelec
G.R No. 221697 April 5, 2016