Personnel Psychology Flashcards
Adverse impact
Potential legal issue in personnel selection
When minority group members are hired at a lower rate than majority group members
Causes include:
Differential validity
Unfairness
Calculate using the 80 percent (4/5ths rule)
Needs analysis
The first step in developing a training program
4 components:
1) Organization analysis
2) Task analysis
3) Person analysis
4) demographic analysis
3 steps in developing a training program
- Needs analysis
- Program design
- Program evaluation
Advantage of Personnel Comparison Systems
Reduce the effects of certain rater biases:
Central tendency
Leniency
Strictness
Research on interview validity says…
Situational interviews > job-related interviews > psychologically-based interviews
Structured interviews have higher predictive validity than unstructured interviews
Biodata
Biographical information about an applicant’s work history, education, personal interests, skills
Highly predictive of job success when empirically validated (items included because correlate highly with job performance) - 2nd only to cognitive ability for predicting job performance
Particularly useful for predicting job turnover
Equally valid for members of different racial/ethnic groups (.77 for whites and .79 for blacks)
In-basket test
Example of work sample/simulation exercise
Involves seeing how a participant responds to the kinds of tasks (e.g. memos, reports, messages) they would encounter on the job
Criterion contamination
When a rater’s knowledge of a person’a performance on a selection instrument (e.g. performance in the assessment center) affects how the rater evaluates the person’s performance once they are on the job
Affects the validity of assessment centers
80 percent (4/5ths) rule
Adverse impact is when minority group is less than 80% selection rate of majority group
Eg. If 60% of male applicants are hired, then at least 48% of female applicants must be hired (.60 x .80 = .48). If rate is less than 48%, there is adverse impact of selection procedures.
Interest tests
E.g. Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory, Kuder Occupational Survey
Have low validity for predicting occupational success, but are useful for vocational counselling or predicting job satisfaction, job persistence, job choice
Integrity tests
Lower validity for predicting job performance
Useful for selecting employees with reduced probability for stealing, etc (counterproductive job behaviours)
Bona fide occupational qualification
Adverse impact is permitted when there is a valid reason for hiring a substantially larger portion of a subgroup
E.g. Hire more men bc job requires heavy lifting
Differential validity
When a selection procedure is a valid predictor of job performance for one group but not another
A cause of adverse impact
Unfairness
When one group consistently scores lower than another group on a selection test (so less likely to be hired) but both groups perform equally well on the job
Methods of score adjustment to compensate for bias
Separate cutoffs
Within group norming
Banding (treating all scores within a given band/range as equivalent)