personality psychology book Flashcards

1
Q

personality definition in psy

A

psychological differences between people, differences having to do with thought, emotion, motivation, and behaviour.
ways in which people differ from one another in their typical ways of behaving, thinking, and feeling. These differences often reflect core features of who we are as persons, and are central to our self-concepts.
This understanding of personality often excludes individual differences in intelligence and cognitive ability, although these are also of interest to many personality psychologists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Temperament definition

A

aspects of psycholog- ical individuality that are present at birth or at least early in child development, are related to emotional expression, and are presumed to have a biological basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Character definition

A

refers to those personal attributes that are relevant to moral conduct, self-mastery, will-power, and integrity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how is personality psychology unique`

A

psychology, the study of personality is distinctive for its focus on human individuality and its concern for the person as a functioning whole. It differs from social psychology, a neighbouring subdiscipline, by emphasizing the contribution that the person’s internal dispositions make to behaviour, rather than the contribution of the person’s external situation or context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

personality trait definition

A

A major unit for the description of personality is the ‘personality trait’ , an enduring disposition (or tendency) to think, feel, or behave in a particular, patterned way. Traits vary in breadth, some relating to very specific or narrow types of behaviour and others to wide ranges of behaviour, and broader traits may incorporate more specific traits.
Personality psychologists have made efforts to classify the structure of traits for more than 70 years, starting from the thousands of trait words available in everyday language and distilling these, using correlations and factor analysis, into a smaller number of broad trait dimensions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Correlation definition

A

how closely related two trait is to each other. their degree of similarity can be help for prediction and prediction accuracy
0.1=55%, 0.3=65%, 0.5= 75%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

factor analysis.

A

factor analysis is a method for finding patterns within a group of correlations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

specific traits

A

Although broad factors play an important role in personality description, many more specific traits have also been the focus of personality research and theory. These specific traits may be more effective in predicting behaviour than broader traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Variety in trait psychology

A

Although the psychology of traits has made major contributions to the study of personality, it has also come under criticism on a variety of fronts. For example, some psychologists have argued that behaviour is not very consistent across different contexts, and that it is therefore determined primarily by the situation in which it occurs rather than by enduring traits. However, traits can predict behaviour well when the behaviour is assessed as aggregate patterns rather than single actions.
Other psychologists have argued that trait dimensions are not culturally universal, and that explaining behaviour with reference to personality is characteristically Western. Research tends to support the view that broad factors are reasonably universal, with a few exceptions. However, there is also evidence of cross-cultural variation in the structure of traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

personality ‘types’

A
  • Trait psychologists usually assume that individual differences in personality fall along continuous dimensions: they are matters of degree, like height. Although some psychologists have proposed categorical personality ‘types’ , most personality variation is dimensional. •
  • It has been controversial whether traits explain behaviour rather than merely describing or summarizing behaviour patterns. However, personality traits can play a role in explaining behaviour in the same, non-circular way that other inferred variables do.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Behavioural genetic research

A

Behavioural genetic research uses a variety of methods to study the contribution of genetic variation to personality. Family studies examine the extent to which people of different levels of genetic relatedness within families resemble one another, twin studies compare the resemblance of identical and fraternal twins, and adoption studies investigate the extent to which adopted children resemble their biological and adoptive parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Result of • Behavioural genetic research

A

This research consistently finds that the heritability of personality characteristics (i.e., the proportion of their variation that is explained by genes) is between .4 and .5. It also demonstrates that most of the non-genetic contributions to personality are due to ‘non-shared environment’ – influences that are distinctive to individuals rather than shared within families.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Molecular genetic research

A

attempts to identify the specific genes that influence variation on major personality traits. Although many such genes have now been identified, these typically account for far less variance than one might expect based on findings from behavioural genetics. This may suggest that genetic influences on personality comprise complex interactions between tens or even hundreds of genes. If so, detection of these effects will pose a formidable challenge for this field.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Eysenck’s General Arousal Theory

A

• Eysenck’s General Arousal Theory of personality suggested that Extraversion was based in the functioning of a reticulo-cortical loop (underlying cortical arousal), while Neuroticism was based in the functioning of a reticulo-limbic loop (underlying emotional arousal). Despite having a profound influence on personality neuroscience, Eysenck’s theory is no longer considered tenable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory

A

Gray suggested that personality neuroscience should proceed from the ‘bottom up’ , by starting with the major brain systems that seem likely to influence personality. His Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory proposed that three systems, the BAS (reward sensitivity), the FFFS (threat sensitivity) and the BIS (conflict sensitivity), were likely to have an important influence on personality variation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• Depue and Carver

A

Depue and Carver have developed theories regarding the role of specific neurotransmitters in personality variation. Depue’s theory, which links Extraversion to dopamine function, appears consistent with Gray’s theory regarding the BAS. Both Depue and Carver link serotonin function with constraint, a trait that appears similar to Conscientiousness.

17
Q

The cognitive approach to personality

A

The cognitive approach to personality differs from others in emphasizing the ways in which people actively make sense of themselves and their worlds. It explains individual differences in terms of cognitions such as beliefs, concepts, attitudes, explanations, and abilities.
• The cognitive approach arose in part out of a rebellion against the passive and deterministic view of human nature in behaviourist theory, and also resonates with some aspects of humanistic personality theories. Social learning and social-cognitive theories also introduced cognitive concepts into the study of personality. • • There is no single cognitive theory of personality, only a number of concepts that have inspired active programmes of research.

18
Q

‘Personal constructs’

A

‘Personal constructs’ are cognitive structures that people use to interpret, perceive, or ‘construe’ the world. They are bipolar – composed of one attribute and a contrasting attribute (e.g., warm vs. cold) – and each individual has a unique, subjective repertoire of them. According to personal construct theory, our main motivation is to grasp and anticipate events in the world accurately, like scientists.

19
Q

A ttributions’

A

A ttributions’ are explanations that people give for events. An event may be attributed to causes that differ in several ways. How people habitually explain events is their ‘attributional [or explanatory] style’ . People who typically attribute negative events to causes that are internal to themselves, lasting and broad in their implications (i.e., pessimists) are vulnerable to a variety of negative outcomes.

20
Q

‘Coping strategies’

A

‘Coping strategies’ are ways of dealing with adversity, implemented when events are judged to be stressful. Different strategies are associated with better and worse coping with particular kinds of stressors.

21
Q

The self is a cognition:

A

The self is a cognition: a mental representation of what the person is like. Self-esteem and self-complexity are ways in which these representations differ between people: how positively the self is evaluated and how many distinct aspects compose it. Both are associated with important life outcomes in interesting ways: self-esteem, for example, is not the recipe for unbridled happiness and success that it is sometimes claimed to be.

22
Q

personality stability

A

By definition, personality is at least somewhat stable over time, but how stable it is remains an important research and theoretical question.

23
Q

Longitudinal studies

A

Longitudinal studies suggest high levels of ‘rank-order stability’ – stability in people’s positions on trait dimensions relative to their peers – of personality traits, especially in adulthood. This stability may reflect a variety of genetic and environmental factors, and it increases with age.

24
Q

‘mean-level change’

A

change in the average level of traits from one age to another – demonstrate that personality is also malleable. Studies reveal predictable trajectories of mean-level change over the adult life-span, as well as changes from one historical period to another.

25
Q

temperament,

A

• Personality develops out of temperament, and there appear to be several meaningful continuities between dimensions of infant and child temperament and adult personality trait factors.

26
Q

Erikson

A

Personality development cannot be reduced entirely to mean-level change in temperament or personality dimensions. Theorists such as Erikson propose that different stages of life involve different themes and concerns.

27
Q

The malleability or fixity of personality

A

• The malleability or fixity of personality matters for psychological theory and practice. It may even matter in everyday thinking: people who believe personality is fixed tend to stereotype others.