Personality Chapter 3-6 Flashcards

EXAM 1

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are traits?

A

They are internal desires, needs, and wants from one situation to the next

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the Three Approaches to Identifying Traits

A

Lexical, Statistical, Theoretical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Theoretical Approach

A

Theory explains behavior. The behavior suggests internal traits Ex: Theory of Sociosexual Orientation

The purpose is to discuss how early personality psychologists understood what traits we have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lexical Approach - Synonym Frequency

A

The more words to describe a trait, the more important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lexical Approach - Cross Cultural Universality

A

Which cultures have a word for any specific trait?

Describing differences among people, natural language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the Pros & Cons to the Lexical Approach?

A

Perspectives, but Too many adjectives to describe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statistical Approach - Factor Analysis

A

Group ratings of trait adjectives into basic categories, Items that covary ( certain adjectives go together, positive correlation) together are grouped under a factor (Important that they don’t load onto other traits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of Personality

A

He believed these traits were heritable and have psychophysiological foundation:

Psychoticism (P)
Extraverstion-Introversion (E)
Neuroticism-Emotional Stability (N)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Wiggins Circumplex

A

Interactions between people best display their inner interpersonal traits
Interactions are exchanges of love and status ( both adding and removing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 PF System

A

Started with the lexical approach and self reports
Then used the factor analysis - that identified the 16 factors
The criticisms - others failed to replicate the same 16 factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Three relationships of Circumplex Taxonomies

A

Adjacency - how close the traits are to each other, positively correlated
Bipolarity - opposite sides of circle, 2 negative correlated
Orthogonal - perpendicularity no relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Five Factor Model

A

Found by dozens of researchers using different samples, replicated in different languages, replicated in every decade for the past half century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The 16 PF System Related Research

A

347 university students given personality assessment
120 survey items to begin
They used factor analysis to confirm 12 out of the 16 factors
The 12 factors are more closely related to the 5 factor model
Cattell’s model eventually led to the 5 factor model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Five Factor Model Related Research

A

Over 25K people from 18 different countries surveyed
Researchers were specifically interested in education level
Lower educated adults don’t fit the 5 factor model
Found that those with less education were more likely acquiescent
When correcting for this bias, a model fit was found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Wiggins Cricumplex Related Research

A

315 participants given Interpersonal Adjectives Scale
Also given to friends and spouse, taken about the participants
Researchers found corroborating evidence of the individuals personality
Complements the 5 factor model and is related to E and A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Five Factor Model OCEAN

A
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Neuroticism
  • used the lexical and statistical approaches
  • achieved a greater degree of consensus than any other trait taxonomy
  • missing positive and negative evaluations
  • missing religiosity and spirituality
17
Q

HEXACO

A
Honesty
Emotionality
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Conscientiousness
Openness

Based on research, profitability outcomes with honesty

18
Q

Assumptions about Personality

A

There are measurable differences between people
Our personalities largely stay the same as we age
The traits we have remain with us in all situations

19
Q

Assumptions in Research

A

52 People were given personality assessment at the age of 26 and again at age 32, They needed to write a personal narrative which was analyzed for communication ability, problem solving ability, and emotional ability
Results then showed the there were growth in all qualities
SAME high to high low to low
marriage mediated the largest gains in all qualities

20
Q

Person-Situation Interaction

A

From our internal qualities, we tend to construct our situations
How we see the world, tends to favor us and our needs/interests

21
Q

Individual Differences Matter

A

Characteristics of the person moderate their feelings, thoughts, and behaviors (even if the construal is the same) Ex: driving

Selection, Evocation, Manipulation
place ourselves in situations, and our traits then evoke specific responses, how we influence others

22
Q

Selection Research

A

Need for achievement : work
Extraversion: recreation
We pick our situations based on our traits

23
Q

Evocation Research

A

People who lived in city areas are higher on these qualities and prefer: fast paced lifestyle, increased ability to exploit others for their own gain, financially or sexually
decreased likelihood of getting caught
DARK TRIAD - Manipulation, Machiavellianism, Psychoticism/psychopathology
narcissism/psychopathy

24
Q

Manipulation Research

A

59 dating couples, Charm, Silent Treatment, Regression, Coercion, Reason, & Debasement
Sex differences with regression and debasement
Debasement means lowering values

25
Q

Aggregating Behavior

A

We can tell someone’s attitude based on several samples of behavior
Adding up or averaging several observations
Results in more reliable assessment Ex: going to church

Participants record daily activity for 6 months: r.08 one day basis
three week segments aggregate activity level r= .66

26
Q

Prediction for the Workforce

A

Personnel Selection
Integrity Testing
Concerns over Negligent Hiring