Personal rule, 1629-40 Flashcards
Why can it be argued that Charles I was seeking absolute monarchy?
- Dissolution + personal rule constituted deliberate attempt to destroy parliament and govern by divine right
- Parliament opponents were imprisoned - 1632 - John Elliot died in Tower of London
‘Eleven years Tyranny’?
What is the argument against the view that Charles was seeking absolute monarchy?
- May have sought efficiency and stable govt
- Based on his political and religious beliefs
Why did the dissolution in 1629 provoke little reaction?
Due to actions of MPs forcing resolutions seeming to justify it
How did Charles’ personal rule initially go?
Well - first few years - calm and orderly - Charles effective ruler
- He devoted many hours to daily govt business - regularly met w/ privy council
What appointments did Charles make from 1632-33?
1632 - Sir Thomas Wentworth, later Lord Strafford, as Lord Deputy of Ireland
1633 - William Laud as Archbishop of Canterbury
How did Charles end hostilities w/ Spain?
How did annual war spending change?
1630 - Treaty of Madrid
- Annual spending on war - £500,000 from 1625-29 to under £70,000 in 1630s
What policy areas did Charles pay attention to during his personal rule?
- Crown’s finances
- Reorganisation of the management of Crown lands
- Adding new impositions of T&P
- Feudal payments revived
In 1634, what economic decision by Charles generated resentment and public debate?
He issued a monopoly patent for soap production - that shut out competition in the market
1641 - opponents claimed many driven out of business - and prices to public rising - only to benefit king’s revenues
What was the greatest economic controversy of Charles’ personal rule?
Ship Money - annual levy - worth £200,000 a year to the Exchequer
- For upkeep of the navy
- Collected by country sheriffs - set amount by govt
Why was Ship Money so controversial?
Usually levied once or twice in a monarch’s reign - but now was levied annually and across the entire country rather than just countries lining the coast.
What was the distraint of knighthood?
- Medieval custom - those w/ land over £40 per annum - expected to be knighted at King’s coronation
- If they failed to present themselves - would be fined - over 9,000 were fined
Why were groups w/ Puritan connections concerned by the reforms in church, state and society from 1629-36?
Church of England:
- Promotion of Arminians - Laud - insistence on control of clergy by bishops
- Charles and Laud - demand strict adherence to rules
- Substitution of ritual and formality in place of Puritan emphasis on individual prayer and preaching
(Ministers who resisted - brought before church courts or Prerogative court of High Commission - deprived of livings if failed to conform)
Were the clergy impacted by the church reforms during Charles’ personal rule?
Number of them forced out didn’t rise greatly in 1630s - numbers exclude 100 or more clergy who emigrated to puritan colonies of New England
What 3 things did Charles’ church policies emphasise?
- Order
- Formality
- Hierarchy
What was the aim of the religious reforms in the 1630s?
- Hierarchy and ceremony designed to instil respect for monarchy
- Emphasised religious roots of Charles’ power