Personal rule, 1629-40 Flashcards

1
Q

Why can it be argued that Charles I was seeking absolute monarchy?

A
  • Dissolution + personal rule constituted deliberate attempt to destroy parliament and govern by divine right
  • Parliament opponents were imprisoned - 1632 - John Elliot died in Tower of London

‘Eleven years Tyranny’?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the argument against the view that Charles was seeking absolute monarchy?

A
  • May have sought efficiency and stable govt

- Based on his political and religious beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why did the dissolution in 1629 provoke little reaction?

A

Due to actions of MPs forcing resolutions seeming to justify it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Charles’ personal rule initially go?

A

Well - first few years - calm and orderly - Charles effective ruler
- He devoted many hours to daily govt business - regularly met w/ privy council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What appointments did Charles make from 1632-33?

A

1632 - Sir Thomas Wentworth, later Lord Strafford, as Lord Deputy of Ireland

1633 - William Laud as Archbishop of Canterbury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did Charles end hostilities w/ Spain?

How did annual war spending change?

A

1630 - Treaty of Madrid

- Annual spending on war - £500,000 from 1625-29 to under £70,000 in 1630s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What policy areas did Charles pay attention to during his personal rule?

A
  • Crown’s finances
  • Reorganisation of the management of Crown lands
  • Adding new impositions of T&P
  • Feudal payments revived
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In 1634, what economic decision by Charles generated resentment and public debate?

A

He issued a monopoly patent for soap production - that shut out competition in the market
1641 - opponents claimed many driven out of business - and prices to public rising - only to benefit king’s revenues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the greatest economic controversy of Charles’ personal rule?

A

Ship Money - annual levy - worth £200,000 a year to the Exchequer

  • For upkeep of the navy
  • Collected by country sheriffs - set amount by govt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why was Ship Money so controversial?

A

Usually levied once or twice in a monarch’s reign - but now was levied annually and across the entire country rather than just countries lining the coast.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the distraint of knighthood?

A
  • Medieval custom - those w/ land over £40 per annum - expected to be knighted at King’s coronation
  • If they failed to present themselves - would be fined - over 9,000 were fined
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why were groups w/ Puritan connections concerned by the reforms in church, state and society from 1629-36?

A

Church of England:

  • Promotion of Arminians - Laud - insistence on control of clergy by bishops
  • Charles and Laud - demand strict adherence to rules
  • Substitution of ritual and formality in place of Puritan emphasis on individual prayer and preaching

(Ministers who resisted - brought before church courts or Prerogative court of High Commission - deprived of livings if failed to conform)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Were the clergy impacted by the church reforms during Charles’ personal rule?

A

Number of them forced out didn’t rise greatly in 1630s - numbers exclude 100 or more clergy who emigrated to puritan colonies of New England

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 3 things did Charles’ church policies emphasise?

A
  1. Order
  2. Formality
  3. Hierarchy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the aim of the religious reforms in the 1630s?

A
  • Hierarchy and ceremony designed to instil respect for monarchy
  • Emphasised religious roots of Charles’ power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why was catholic influence in the church perceived to have increased in 1630s?

A
  • Churches decorated w/ statues and colour, organs restored
  • Altar moved to east end of church - for traditional communion

Charles’ most loyal servants - Wentworth and Laud

Influence of the Queen - maintained her own chapel and Catholic clergy - encouraged catholic worship

1635 - Charles welcomed to his court an ambassador from the pope

17
Q

How did opposition view the reforms to church and state?

A

To them, the unfolding picture of govt ominously clear, uniform and threatening to all they valued.

18
Q

What were the first attempts at organised resistance to the king during personal rule?

A
  • Group of Puritan gentry and nobility - active in parliament before 1629 - maintained contact in the Providence Island Company

Leaders: John Pym, Earl of Warwick, Duke of Bedford, Lord Saye and Sele
- Contacts - stretched to family in East Anglia

  • Lawyer: Oliver St. John and John Hampden
19
Q

What did John Hampden do in 1636?

A

Refused to pay Ship Money - initiated legal challenge - Charles used as test case in 1637 - St. John = Hampden’s counsel

Judges found in king’s favour - 5-7 decision in early 1628

20
Q

How did the Privy Council and/or Prerogative Courts silence opposition in the 1630s?

A

E.g. - 1637 - Star Chamber - 3 puritan writers, who attacked govt, to have ears cut off and branded on cheeks then imprisoned
(Burton, Bastwick and Prynne) - sentenced by Laud - rising influence of Laudian bishops in govt

21
Q

Who was William Juxon?

A

Bishop of London

In 1636 - appointed to post of Lord Treasurer - presence of clergymen in govt

22
Q

Why did the yield of Ship Money fall to 20% of expected money in 1639?

A
  • Privy Council and Sheriffs distracted by need to raise army to fight in Scotland
23
Q

Why did Charles’ decision to extend reforms to Scotland ensure failure?

A

1) Weakened his grip on govt
2) Little understanding of Scottish Kingdom
3) Didn’t trust Scottish Privy Council - relied on Scottish exiles in London

24
Q

What was the position of the Scottish Kirk in the 1630s?

A

Had undergone Calvinist reformation - John Knox in 1560 - emerged as Presbyterian institution

  • Presbyterian Kirk run by assembly of ministers and lay Elders
25
Q

What did Charles issue to Scotland in 1636?

A

Book of Canons to Scottish Clergy - how to lay out churches + Church of England practices

26
Q

What did Charles’ introduce to Scotland in 1637?

A

English Prayer Book to Kirks - read in St. Giles Cathedral - riot and disorder in lowlands

27
Q

What happened in Scotland in 1638?

A

National Covenant to defend Kirk + restore religious rights

- Charles and Covenanters raised armies - Charles lacked money relied on county militias

28
Q

What happened in 1639 when Charles realised he couldn’t win against the Covenanters?

A
  • Signed Treaty of Berwick - ended First Bishops’ War
29
Q

Why was there a ‘taxpayers’ strike’ from 1639-40?

A

Many of gentry didn’t want to fund war w/ Scots - Charles lacked funds, unable to borrow from merchants - turned to Wentworth - advised him to call parliament

30
Q

Short Parliament

A

April 1640 - 3 weeks - Charles demanded money - Commons entered series of debates - compelled to dissolved

31
Q

Second Bishops’ War

A

Ill-organised, under-equipped forces from Charles
- Most soldiers sympathised w/ Scots - occupied themselves burning altar rails and other symbols associated w/ Catholicism

Charles defeated at Battle of Newburn - Treaty of Ripon - Oct 1640 - forced to pay Scots £850 a day while occupying Newcastle

32
Q

Explain Calvanism

A
  • John Calvin (1509-64)
  • Achieve salvation through God’s grace - not through own merits
  • 17th century - outward signs of godliness - predestined to heaven
33
Q

Explain Presbyterianism

A
  • Church governed by assembly of elders or officials - instead of hierarchy or bishops