Personal Remedies Against Trustees/Fiduciaries Flashcards
Structure - Personal Claims
- Identify the Breach of Trust (case law + TA 2000)
- Establish that the Breach of Trust has Caused a Loss (Nestle)
- Consider Defences
- Consider Contributions and Indemnity
Breach - Duty actively to watch over and correct behaviour of fellow trustees
STYLES v GUY
Breach - Keep trust property in joint control unless delegated
ss.11 and 12 TA 2000
Breach - Duty of care (investment and delegation) – to exercise such care and skill as is reasonable having regard to any special knowledge trustee has or holds themselves out to have
S.1 TA 2000
Breach - Duty to act as the reasonably prudent man of business in relation to your trust
SPEIGHT v GAUNT
Loss - The loss exists if the D trustee made less than the reasonable T would have, doing their duties
Nestle
Loss - Exception: if profit and loss from same breach, they can offset each other
Bartlett v Barclays
Defence - Courts may relieve Ts of some or all liability if they acted honestly and reasonably (unless Ts are professional and/or took advice)
s.61 TA 1925 + BARTLETT v BARCLAYS + NATIONAL TRUSTEE CO
Defence - Express Exclusion Clause for innocent or negligent breaches - Fraudulent breaches cannot be excluded in the trust instrument
ARMITAGE v NURSE
Defence - Limitation (6 years) and Laches (inequitable)
s.21(3) Limitation Act 1980
Defence - Consent - A Beneficiary can’t sue on a breach he consented to if:
RE PAULING’S SETTLEMENT TRUST
a. He’s an adult / sui juris
b. He gave free consent
c. He knew the relevant facts (does not need to know it’s a Breach of Trust)
Contribution - The court may order such contribution as just and equitable with regard to levels of blame/responsibility
s.2 Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978
Indemnity - Up to 100% can be sought as indemnity where the co-trustee received trust property and used for own benefit
BAHIN v HUGHES
Indemnity - Where a T blindly followed the advice of a co-trustee who is a solicitor, he can recover full indemnity
RE PARTINGTON - Can only use Re Partington if co-trustee exerted such a controlling influence T did not use own judgement - HEAD v GOULD