Personal Jurisdiction and Notice Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the key elements of due process protection in personal jurisdiction?

A

Defendant’s right not to be dragged into an unfair forum, the right to notice, and opportunity to defend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which amendments make up the Due Process Clause and what are their meanings

A

5th and 14th. Defendant has right to not have person jurisdiction asserted by a state or the federal system in such a way as to deprive of life,liberty, or property without due process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 3 types of personal jurisdiction and their definitions

A

In personam– a judgement against a person and his/her assets

In rem– property located in a state’s territory

Quasi-in-rem– judgement against a person but with recovery limited to the value of property attached within the territory at the beginning of the case, and thus subject to the court’s authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are long arm statutes

A

Allows for states to have jurisdiction over non-resident defendants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the federal equivalent to long arm statutes?

A

a federal statute creating a cause of action either has its own service provision and long arm or plaintiff must borrow the long arm of the state where the court sits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does rule 4(k)(1) say?

Territorial Limits of Effective Service

A

Serving a summons or filing a waiver of service establishes personal jurisdiction over a defendant:

a) who is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of general jurisdiction in the state where the district is located;
b) who is a party joined under Rule 14 or Rule 19 and is served within a judicial district of the United States and not more than 100 miles from where the summons was issued; or
c) when authorized by a federal statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does rule (4)(k)(2) say?

Federal Claim Outside State-Court Jurisdiction

A

For a claim that arises under federal law, serving a summons or filing a waiver of service establishes personal jurisdiction over a defendant if:

a) the defendant is not subject to jurisdiction in any state's courts of general jurisdiction; and
b) exercising jurisdiction is consistent with the United States Constitution and laws
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What questions must be asked when analyzing personal jurisdiction?

A

Does the long arm reach the defendant by its terms? (read and analyze the long arm)

Does the assertion of jurisdiction under this long arm violate the due process rights of the defendant under these particular circumstances?

If long arm does not reach there is no further inquiry.

If long arm does each, the assertion of jurisdiction under the circumstances of the case could still violate due process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the traditional methods of Personal Jurisdiction (from pennoyer)

A

Defendant is served with process in the forum (had temporary presence) Defendant’s agent was served in the forum, defendant is domiciled in the forum, defendant consented to jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is domicile?

A

Residence in the state + intent to remain. If D is served and domiciled in that state, court has jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What impact does Residence have

A

Court has jurisdiction in the state of D’s residence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Scalia test for Temporary Presence

A

Presence + Service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Brennan Test for temporary presence

A

minimum contacts + reasonableness

Minimum contacts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What impact does temporary presence have?

A

If D is served while in the state, aside from a few exceptions, court has jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the exceptions to temporary presence

A

If defendant is brought to forum by fraud

If defendant is brought to forum to participate in litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is transient presence as it relates to temporary presence

A

does not matter why or how long D was in the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the effect of consent?

A

defendant can consent to the assertion of PJ over him/her/it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is Express Consent? and what is a common way to get it

A

D has expressly consented to PJ being asserted over him. Typically defendant signed a contract with a Forum Selection Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the stipulations of a FSC in a contract?

A

Prima facie valid unless D can show it is unreasonable.
Must be REALLY unreasonable, like a plae so remote and unconnected to the parties
Most Parties never agree to have a FSC cover torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is an implied consent

A

Consent to jurisdiction is implied by statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What did the Hess case give us on implied consent

A

In Hess defendant drove on highway in another state and got into wreck. Traveling on roads implied consent to the jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is waiver in personal jurisdiction

A

Defendant can waive due procces protection by engaging in conduct the reveals no intention to claim those rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the three types of waiver

A

Contract, conduct, and statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is contract as it applies to waiver and PJ

A

due process rights are individual and can be waived by giving them up in a contract– through an exclusive forum selection clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What does conduct have to do with waiver and PJ

A

engaging in the judicial process and not submitting to the court’s power to determine its own jurisdiction

26
Q

What do statutes have to do with waiver and PJ

A

states and federal government have the power to assert jurisdiction by statute– the basis is that D recieves some benefit from the state or federal gov and the quid pro quo for that is accepting service of process through an agent

EX: driving on roads in other states

27
Q

How is presence determined for corporations

A

principle place of business or state of incorporation

28
Q

What are the purposes of long arm statutes

A

1) to declare under what circumstances the state was willing to assert PJ over non-resident defendants
2) To provide for the service of process on non-resident defendants

29
Q

What are the 3 types of long arms

A

very broad– power over non resident extends to the limits of the Constitution

mid-level— tries to describe in fairly broad categories the type of conduct that will justify the assertion of jurisdiction

laundry list— narrowly tailored statues that attempt to describe exactly what omissions will allow for jurisdiction

30
Q

What is specific jurisdiction?

A

lawsuit arises out of the D’s conduct in that forum

31
Q

What is the formula for jurisdiction (from International Shoe)

A

minimum contacts + reasonableness

32
Q

What is the question to ask for Minimum contacts.

A

What did the defendant do to purposefully avail himself to the forum?

33
Q

What are some of the things to look at for minimum contacts

A
  • Must analyze the quality and nature of the activities
  • one contact can be sufficient
  • focuses on MC when D acted. not at the time of lawsuit
  • MC is good for individuals and corporations
34
Q

What are the four factors courts look at for reasonableness

A

1) Burden on the defendant
2) Plaintiff’s interest in the forum
3) State’s interest in the forum
4) Interstate system’s interest in obtaining the most effective place for resolving the dispute (rarely invoked)

35
Q

What are things the courts look at to determine the burden on the defendant

A
  • expenses on defendant
  • Ability to get witnesses
  • Ability to get evidence
  • Cost of litigation
36
Q

What is it that the assertion of jurisdiction must not offend

A

traditional notions of fair plan and substantial justice

37
Q

What are the effects of burden’s in specific jurisdiction?

A

P bears burden of proof to show D’s MC in the forum and then burden shifts to D to establish why the assertion of jurisdiction would be unreasonable

38
Q

Under international shoe test what must the contact result from.

A

defendant’s purposeful availament

39
Q

How can we determine purposeful availment

A

D has to direct his activities to the forum and reach out to them.

Did D purpose avail himself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws

40
Q

What does the MC Analysis for Contracts look for

A

Burger King Test…. 4 things:

1) negotiations
2) actual terms of the contract
3) Course of dealing
4) Future consequences

41
Q

What are negotiations in relation to the MC analysis for contracts

A

where the parties hammered out the deal and discussed the contract before it was made

42
Q

What do actual terms of the contract have to do with the MC analysis for contracts

A

what things does the contract require be done in the target forum… choice of law clause or money being mailed to the forum

43
Q

What do course of dealings have to do with the MC analysis for contracts

A

Decision making authority in the forum, who was in charge when it was made and where, and who drafted it

44
Q

What do future consequences have to do with the MC analysis for contracts

A

How long does/did it run etc.

Not necessarily true for all contracts (i.e. singer has a contract to sing at Reliant for one night)

45
Q

What is the O’Connor Test for MC analysis for stream of commerce

A

Goods into stream + Intent to serve forum

To establish MC the company must have put the goods into the stream of commerce with intent to serve the forum marker

46
Q

What are some factors O’Connor looks at to determine intent

A
  • Designing product for the forum
  • Advertising in forum state
  • Establishing distributing chains in forum
  • Setting up service system in forum

Awareness is not enough.. need intent

47
Q

Is the O’Connor test pro-defendant or pro-plaintiff

A

Pro-Defendant

48
Q

What is the Brennan test for MC analysis for stream of commerce

A

Goods into steam + knowledge (awarness)

TO establish MC the company must put the goods into the stream of commerce with knowledge (awareness) that the goods would reach the forum

49
Q

Is Brennan test pro-defendant or pro-plaintiff

A

Pro-plaintiff

50
Q

What is the rule regarding foreseeability and defendants and their products?

A

Must be foreseeable that D can be sued in the forum not foreseeability that the product will get to the forum

51
Q

What are the two decisions on tort liability

A
  • Tort is committed where the injury occurs

- Tort is committed where the company manufactured the product

52
Q

What is General Jurisdiction

A

Defendant can be sued in the forum on a claim that arose anywhere in the world

53
Q

When can a non-resident be sued under general jurisdiction

A

Non-resident defendant can be sued where he has “systematic and continuous contacts” with the forum state such that it is fair to reach

  • There is no reasonableness analysis
  • D had sufficient contacts with the forum to warrent jurisdiction for all matters
  • Claim Could have arose anywhere
54
Q

What is the rule for continuous and systematic contacts from Helicopteros

A

Need as many factors as possible to prove continuous and systematic contacts. Court in Helicopteros listed:

  • Authorized to do business
  • Signed contracts
  • Have employees
  • Recruited employees
  • Sold product
  • Solicited business
  • Owned real estate
  • Miantained office
  • Had shareholders
  • Maintain Records
55
Q

What is the bottom line rule that Goodyear gave us on general jurisdiction

A

Companies must be considered “at home there”

56
Q

What must process consist of?

A

summons and a copy of the complaint

57
Q

Who can make service?

A

Service can be made by any non party who is at least 18 years old

58
Q

What choices do the plaintiff(s) have on how to serve under Rule 4(e)(2)

A
  • Personal Service (delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally)
  • Substituted Service (leaving a copy of each at the individual’s dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there;)
  • Serve the agent (delivering a copy of each to an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.)
59
Q

What does Rule 4(e)(1) allow

A

Allows us to use state law methods of service of process using sate law the federal court sits or state low where the service is effected.

“May be served by.. following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made”

60
Q

How can we serve process on a business (FRCP 4(h)(1))

A

Can serve an officer or a managing or general agent of the business.

4(e)(1) also applies

61
Q

What is important about 4(d) waiver of service

A

This is done by mail but is not service by mail
mail defendant two copies of the waiver form with the process with self-addressed stamped envelop
Done within 30 days
If defendant does not do so and does not have a good reason to do so they will pay for cost of service

62
Q

What is the constitutionality test of service

A

Notice must be reasonably calculated under all the circumstances to apprise the party of the proceeding (does not means notice actually be recieved)

If plaintiff becomes aware of a lack of actual notice then you must try another method