Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

1
Q

definition of PJ

A

power of the courts over the defendants person or property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Illinois Courts have personal jurisdiction if TWO things are true

A

1) Statutorily authorized (IL law must grant PJ)

2) IL law must be CONSTITUTIONAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Under IL law what are the 3 bases for PJ?

A

1) Consent
2) Presence
3) Long-Arm Statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the general personal jursidiction bases?

A

1) consent and

2) presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the specific PJ jurisdiction bases?

A

Long-Arm Statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 2 kinds of consent?

A

1) express

2) Implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Express Consent

A

Any verbal expression of consent to PJ including forum selection clause in K.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the most common type of express consent

A

forum selection clause in K between parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Implied Consent

A

Defendant failed to object to PJ in FIRST RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT which in IL must be filed w/i 30 days of service of process, but 60 days if waive formal process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 3 forms of presence

A

1) actual, voluntary, physical presence of IL and actually served with process in state
2) defendants domicile
3) “Doing Business”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does domicile mean

A

Defendants true home and intends to remain or return to that home

1) physical presence
2) intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does “doing business” mean?`

A

regular systematic and continuous in state business to be at home in state
- IL gets general jurisdiction over state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Long-Arm Statute mean

A

under IL Long-Arm Statutethere is a PJ over a D who performs one of the following acts, so long there is a SPECIFIC connection b/w the act and the lawsuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the acronym for IL long-arm statute?

A

LIMIT

1) Land
2) Injury
3) Matrimony
4) Transaction of Business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Land for long-arm statute

A

Defendant used, owned, or possessed land in IL, from which law suit derives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Injury for long-arm statute

A

Injury in IL from D’s tort (any breach of duty) from which lawsuit derives

17
Q

Matrimony for long-arm statute (sad)

A
Defendant does act in IL that gives rise to for an action for 
1) separation 
2) Alimony 
3) Divorce 
from which law suit derives 
- SAD
18
Q

Insurance contract for Illinois Long-Arm statute

A

D enters into an insurance K fr something insured in IL, from which lawsuit derives

19
Q

Transaction of Business for IL Long-Arm Statte

A

can be a single transaction of business in IL from which lawsuit derives
- term of art for specific jurisdiction

20
Q

Illinois courts also have PJ ?

A

to the max extent allowed by the constitution

21
Q

Even if IL law grants PJ, IL law must also be

A

CONSTITUTIONAL

22
Q

When is PJ constitutional

A

If D engaged in such minimum sufficient contacts that would not be unfair to make D defend in IL

  • When defendant has
    1) purposefully availed itself of benefits of IL
    2) and targeted IL consumers from which lawsuit derives
23
Q

what are the key words for PJ to be constitutional

A

1) minimum sufficient contracts
2) fairness +
a) purposefully availed itself
b) targeted consumers
c) from which lawsuit derives

24
Q

what court looks at for PJ being constitutional

A

w/e D had minimum sufficient contacts court will consider

1) w/e the D PURPOSEFULLY AVAILED himself to the benefits and protections of state law
2) w/e the D could have reasonably anticipated that his activities within the state could make him amenable to to a law suit within the state
3) w/e the exercise of jurisdiction would offend the traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice