Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

1
Q

Personal Jurisdiction Barf

A

The power of a court to make a binding order against a party and is obtained by giving notice within the graps the state’s long-arm statute as permitted by federal statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Notice Definition

A

A court may exercise jurisdiction over an out of state defendant upon proper notice to the extent permitted by the long arm stature where the court sits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rule 4 Notice

A

Permits notice within 120 days of filing and must contain the name of the court and parties, be directed to the defendant, and served by someone who is not a party to the action and over 18.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mullane

A

Notice should be reasonably calculated to impart notice under the totality of the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Long arm Statute

A

The long arm state must be coextensive with the U.S Consitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bulge Rule

A

A defendant must be within 100 miles of district court where summons was made is good pj without needing minimun contacts.

Applies to Defendants joined under Rule 14 or 19.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Minimum Contacts Definition

A

A defendant must have sufficient contacts within the forum state such that maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Traditional PJ

A
  1. Consent (Express, Implied, Waived)
  2. Domicile (D domicile, C Incorporation)
  3. Physical Presence in State (In Rem, In Persom)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Minumum Contacts Nexus

A
  1. Continous and Systematic/Related to Lawsuit: Never Doubted
  2. Isolated/Related to Lawsuit: Purpose Availment/Fairness Factors
  3. Continous & Systematic/Unrelated to Lawsuit: Pervasive Presence/Fairness Factors
  4. Isolated/Not Related to Lawsuit: No J
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pervasive Presence Minimum Contacts

A

Only applies to corporations

General jurisdiction can be obtained over a corporation if its continous and systematic activities are so pervasive that jurisdiction extends to even unrelated matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Purposeful Direction/Availment

A

If the defendant purposefully directed its activity at the forum state or purposefully availed itself to the benefits and protection of the laws of the forum state it would be foreseeble for the defendant to hailed into court there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Contract Minimum Contacts Test

Purposeful Availment

A
  1. Maintining contract in forum state. (YES PJ)
  2. Entering into a contract with a resident of the forum state (No PJ)
  3. Contract negoiated and/or performed in the forum state is D purposefully availing themselves there. (PJ)
  4. P Entering into a contract in forum state, then moving does not cause D to purposefully avail themselves to new state (NO PJ)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Internet (Availement)

A

Active Website v. Passive website.

  1. Active: Ebay.
  2. Passive: Only gives info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stream of Commerce Availment

A
  1. O’Conner: Merely putting something into the stream of commerce is not minimun contacts even if the party has knowledge it will go to a specific state.
  2. Brennan: A product that will be marketed nationally puts the party on notice of the possibilty of being hailing to a forum where an injury occured.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fair play and Substantial Justice

A
  1. Burden on the parties.
  2. Interest of the forum state in resolving the dispute.
  3. Plaintiff interest in obtaining relief.
  4. Efficient Resolution of controversies between states.
  5. Shared interest of the states in furthering state policies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defense to PJ Rule 12 b

A
  1. Lack of SMJ
  2. Lack of PJ
  3. Improper Venue
  4. Insufficient Process
  5. Insufficient Service of Process
  6. Failure to state a claim
  7. Failure to join a party under Rule 19.
17
Q

Challenging Pj

A
  1. Traditional Default or Collateral Attack 2. Special Appearence 3. FRCP Rule 12