Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

PJ is the ability of a court to issue a binding

A

judgment over the parties in an action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actions seeking monetary judgments are

A

in personam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actions seeking declarations of the true owner of

A

specific property relative to everyone in the world are in rem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Actions seeking declaration of the true owneer between only the litigants are

A

Quasi in rem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For most cases, if PJ exists in state court

A

it will also exist in the relevant federal court as the Constitutional scope of FRCP 4(k)(1)(A) is broad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PJ must exist over each…

A

individual claim of the lawsuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In personam PJ is split into

A

General PJ and Specific PJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

General PJ exists when the claims are unrelated to events or contracts within the forum state where suit is brought. (They can happen anywhere in the world).

A

General PJ is good with any claim the plaiintiff has against the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Specific PJ exists when

A

the claims in the suit ARISE out of events in the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The first step to evaluate PJ is whether the state

A

has an applicable LAS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

For most civil cases, PJ in federal court has the

A

same boundaries as PJ in state court because of FRCP 4(k)(1) (A).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

International shoe broadened the scope of PJ

A

over out-of-state defendants,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

And States enacted LAS to address getting PJ over an out-of-state Defendant who was

A

absent of service in the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

An ennumerated LAS is more restrictive… while non-ennumerated LAS

A

either explicitly indicate or are interpreted to go to the full extent permitted by the constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If LAS is enumerated, we must analyze whether

A

a claim fits within the state’s LAS, then do an International Shoe analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If a LAS goes tot the full extent of the Constitution, we can

A

simply do the IS analysis

17
Q

Two conditions must be satisfied for a court to satisfy PJ:

A

1) PJ must be constitutionally permissible and 2) must be authorized by an appropriate LAS.

18
Q

P’s consent to PJ when they file the action

A

in the court they have choosen (Keeton)

19
Q

Individuals are subject to General PJ in the state where they

A

hold citizenship (Miliken)

20
Q

Corporations are subject to General PJ where

A

they are are “at home” which can be the state of incorporation or PPOB (Daimler)

21
Q

PJ is permited when a Defendant is physically

A

present in the forum state (Pennoyer)

22
Q

The state’s LAS may aslo describe if PJ is applicable through a

A

business registration statute (a corporation agrees to PJ in exchange for business licensing in the state) if there is a registered agent in the state (Hess)

23
Q

OR possibily through tag jurisdiction

A

and proper service of the complaint and summons (Burnham)