Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is personal jurisdiction?

A

Personal jurisdiction is the court’s power over the parties to the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is original jurisdiction?

A

Original jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear a case for the first time, rather than on appeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An individual United States citizen is a citizen of what state for purposes of diversity jurisdiction?

A

An individual U.S. citizen is a citizen of the state in which she is domiciled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is in rem jurisdiction?

A

In rem jurisdiction is a court’s jurisdiction over property, as opposed to its jurisdiction over individuals. In an in rem case, the court determines the rights of all persons to the property involved. In rem jurisdiction is normally based on a state’s sovereign power over property within its borders.

For in rem, property must be attached at the beginning of the case, can’t be added after. (Pennoyer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is quasi in rem jurisdiction?

A

Quasi in rem jurisdiction is jurisdiction based on the defendant’s ownership of property within the forum state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three main traditional grounds for personal jurisdiction, not including state long-arm jurisdiction?

A

Domicile within the state, service of process while voluntarily present within the state, and consent (including waiver).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is specific jurisdiction?

A

Specific jurisdiction is personal jurisdiction over a defendant that is derived from the defendant’s activities in a state, giving the court power to adjudicate claims arising out of those activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is general jurisdiction?

A

General jurisdiction is the court’s ability to hear cases related to a party, regardless of whether the harm has any connection to the forum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To establish specific jurisdiction, what relationship must exist between the cause of action and the defendant’s contacts with the forum state?

A

Specific jurisdiction is a form of personal jurisdiction under a long-arm statute; it exists if the cause of action arises out of the defendant’s contacts with the forum state.

The counterpart to specific jurisdiction is general jurisdiction, which is personal jurisdiction that exists even if the cause of action does not arise out of the defendant’s contacts with the forum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

To establish general jurisdiction, what relationship must exist between the defendant and the forum state?

A

To establish general jurisdiction, the defendant must have continuous and systematic contacts with the forum state, such that the defendant is at home in that state. (International Shoe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a long-arm statute?

A

A long-arm statute is a state statute extending jurisdiction over nonresidents who have contacts with the state. A court’s exercise of jurisdiction pursuant to a state long-arm statute must nevertheless satisfy the requirements of constitutional due process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the relationship between a state long-arm statute and personal jurisdiction?

A

A state long-arm statute defines the conditions under which the state will assert personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Personal jurisdiction will exist if the long-arm statute, as applied to the defendant, is consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why does a court have personal jurisdiction over a plaintiff?

A

A court has personal jurisdiction over a plaintiff because, by filing the case, the plaintiff consents to personal jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is a matter of individual rights under the United States Constitution. Thus, the plaintiff, like the defendant, may consent to personal jurisdiction. The plaintiff manifests this consent by filing the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which provision of the United States Constitution is most important for purposes of analyzing personal jurisdiction?

A

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the most important constitutional provision for purposes of analyzing personal jurisdiction. The Due Process Clause is used to decide whether a state’s assertion of personal jurisdiction is fundamentally fair to a defendant who is made to appear in the state’s courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a general appearance by a defendant?

A

A defendant makes a general appearance by failing to object to the court’s lack of personal jurisdiction before contesting the merits of the case. A defendant who makes a general appearance in the forum court voluntarily submits to the forum state’s jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a special appearance by a defendant?

A

A defendant can make a special appearance for the sole purpose of contesting jurisdiction. A special appearance does not constitute consent to jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What role do traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice play in analyzing personal jurisdiction?

A

The Supreme Court has held that personal jurisdiction over a defendant requires minimum contacts with the forum state, such that jurisdiction over the defendant will not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. (International Shoe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the role of purposeful availment in analyzing personal jurisdiction?

A

To meet the minimum-contacts requirement for personal jurisdiction, the defendant’s contacts with the forum state must be deliberate. That is, the defendant must have purposefully availed himself of the privilege of conducting some kind of activity in the state, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of that state’s laws. A defendant’s minimum contacts must be such that the defendant should reasonably anticipate being haled into court in the forum state. (McGee)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Which four factors has the Supreme Court identified as important in analyzing traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice in the law of personal jurisdiction?

A

(1) The forum state’s interest in regulating the activity involved or in providing a forum
(2) The relative convenience to the parties in terms of the locations of witnesses and evidence
(3) Whether an alternative forum exists
(4) The avoidance of multiple lawsuits if a single suit would be sufficient to resolve the dispute. (McGee)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

May a court assert personal jurisdiction based on a defendant’s unintentional contacts with the forum state?

A

No. A court may not assert personal jurisdiction based on a defendant’s unintentional contacts with the forum state. Personal jurisdiction requires deliberate, purposeful, or intentional contact by the defendant with the forum state. In one common formulation, the defendant must “purposely avail” itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of that state’s laws. (Denckla)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a forum-selection clause?

A

A forum-selection clause is a provision in a contract or other document by which the parties agree to litigate their disputes in a designated court or a designated location. The agreed-upon forum can be one within a state or one within the federal judicial system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What effect does a valid forum-selection clause have on personal jurisdiction in the selected forum?

A

A valid forum-selection clause is a form of consent to personal jurisdiction in the designated forum state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Can a defendant challenge personal jurisdiction for the first time on appeal?

A

No. Objections to personal jurisdiction are waived if they are not raised early in the litigation, either in a pre-answer motion or in the answer itself. Subject-matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, but personal jurisdiction cannot.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is transient jurisdiction?

A

Transient jurisdiction, also referred to as tag jurisdiction, refers to the power of a court to constitutionally exercise personal jurisdiction if the defendant is served with process while physically and voluntarily present in the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What rule did Pennoyer v. Neff (1878) add?

A

Under the Due Process Clause, no person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court unless person voluntarily appears in the court, is found within the state, resides in the state, or has property in the state that the court has attached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What rule did International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1945) add?

A

For a defendant not present within the territory of a forum to be subjected to a court’s in personam jurisdiction, due process requires that the defendant have ‘certain minimum contacts’ with the forum such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of ‘fair play and substantial justice’.

27
Q

For legal purposes, when is a corporation deemed present within a state?

A

A corporation is deemed present within a state when the activities of the corporation in that state have been continuous and systematic.

28
Q

What rule did McGee v. International Life Insurance Co. (1957) add?

A

A state court has jurisdiction over an out-of-state company if the company has substantial connections with the state. If the company establishes ‘deliberate contact’ within the state, that is a substantial connection.

29
Q

What rule did World-Wide Volkswagen v. Woodson (1980) add?

A

Foreseeability alone is not sufficient to authorize a state court’s assertion of personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant that has no contacts, ties, or relations with the forum state.

If company does not ‘enjoy privileges and benefits’ of that state’s law, they aren’t present there. Plaintiff’s unilateral choice (not a good contact).

30
Q

Exercise of specific jurisdiction is constitutional when:

A

D had purposeful or deliberate contacts w/forum state, P’s claim arose out of those contacts, and personal jurisdiction is reasonable (fair). (World-Wide)

31
Q

What factors establish that the defendant established minimum contacts within a particular forum?

A

Prior negotiations and contemplated future consequences, terms of contract, parties actual course of dealing. I.E. If you do business within a state, you should foresee being sued in that state (World-Wide).

32
Q

What rule did Burger King v. Rudzewicz (1985) add?

A

When determining if a defendant satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for personal jurisdiction, the court must look to the ‘purposefully directed activities’ of the defendant toward the forum state and whether the harms ‘arising out of or relating to’ those activities are the cause of the litigation.

33
Q

What is a choice of law clause?

A

P chooses a particular body of state law contract to govern the interpretation of the contact, courts of the state whose law is chosen do not necessarily have PJ over D.

34
Q

If you appoint an agent, can they be served on your behalf?

A

Yes. (Pennoyer)

35
Q

What rule did Hanson v. Denckla (1958) add?

A

A defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction only if the defendant ‘purposefully avails’ itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state.

36
Q

What rule did Shaffer v. Heitner (1977) add?

A

Quasi in rem jurisdiction may only be asserted when the interests of the persons in the property seized have sufficient contacts, ties, or relations to the state.

37
Q

What rule did Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. (1984) add?

A

Personal jurisdiction is proper over a nonresident magazine in any state where that corporation has sold and distributed a substantial number of copies.

‘Fair warning’ requirement is satisfied if D has ‘purposefully directed’ his activities at residents of the forum.

If you do business in a state you should be aware that you can be sued in that state. (World-Wide)

38
Q

What is the purpose of the ‘minimum contacts’ rule?

A

Defends the defendant from appearing in a court that they don’t have contacts with, limits states from exercising power over each other.

39
Q

What are the ‘fair play’ and ‘substantial justice’ factors? put forth by Justice White in the WWVKW case?

A

(1) D’s burden if jurisdiction is imposed (gravely inconvenient and severe disadvantage)
(2) Forum state’s interest in imposing jurisdiction
(3) P’s interest in obtaining relief
(4) Interstate judicial system’s interest in obtaining efficient resolution (evidence, witnesses)
(5) Furtherance of fundamental substantive social policies (highway accident)

40
Q

What rule did Calder v. Jones (1984) add?

A

The jurisdiction was reasonable because of the effects test.

41
Q

What rule did Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court (1987) add?

A

Exercising personal jurisdiction over an alien defendant is unreasonable and unfair if the burden on the alien defendant from being required to defend itself in a foreign court outweighs the plaintiff’s and forum’s interests in the forum state’s assertion of jurisdiction.

42
Q

What rule did Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (2021) add?

A

A court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in a lawsuit relating to the defendant’s contacts with the forum state.

43
Q

How can one satisfy the “arise out of” or “relates to” element according to the Ford (2021) ruling?

A

The “arises out of” or “relates to” element can be satisfied by showing either that the plaintiff’s claim directly arose out of (i.e., resulted from) the defendant’s in-state contacts or that the plaintiff’s claim is sufficiently related to those contacts.

44
Q

What rule did Burdick v. Superior Court (2015) add (in CA)?

A

For a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in an intentional-tort case, the defendant’s tortious conduct must create a substantial connection with the forum state, not just with the resident plaintiff.

45
Q

What was the effects test put forward in Calder v. Jones (1984)?

A

If the effects concern the (California) activities of a (California) resident. If it impugns on the professional career of a person whose professional career was centered on (California), if the allegations came out of (California) sources, and the brunt of the harm both emotional and career was suffered in (California).

46
Q

What was the express aiming test taken out of Pavlovich v. Superior Court (2002) in (CA)?

A

The defendant committed an intentional tort, the plaintiff felt the brundt of the harm caused by that tort in the forum state such that the forum state was the focal point of the defendant’s injury, and the defendant expressly aimed the tortious conduct at the forum state such that the forum state was the focal point of the tortious activity.

Burden of proof on plaintiff to show defendant knew this would happen.

47
Q

What rule did Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. Hall (1984) add?

A

If the cause of action does not “arise out of” or “relate to” the foreigner’s activities conducted within the forum state, the state may not exercise personal jurisdiction over the foreigner if the general business contacts by the foreigner with the state are not sufficiently continuous and systematic.

48
Q

What rule did Walden v. Fiore (2014) add?

A

Personal jurisdiction may not be exercised over a nonresident civil defendant if the defendant’s sole contact with the forum state is knowledge that the defendant’s tortious conduct committed outside the forum state has an effect on the plaintiff in that state.

49
Q

What rule did Dailmer AG v. Bauman (2014) add?

A

A court can assert general jurisdiction over a corporation if the corporation’s affiliations with the forum state are so continuous and systematic as to render the corporation at home in the state. (INC or HQ)

50
Q

Do you have to consider fairness when talking about general jurisdiction?

A

Fairness is implied because the person or corporation is at home in the state.

51
Q

What are the three main traditional grounds for personal jurisdiction, not including state long-arm jurisdiction?

A

The main traditional grounds for personal jurisdiction are: domicile (individual or corporation) within the state, service of process while voluntarily present within the state, and consent (including waiver).

52
Q

If a claim arises under federal law, and the defendant is not subject to personal jurisdiction in any U.S. state, can a federal court exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant?

A

Yes. If a claim arises under federal law, and the defendant is not subject to personal jurisdiction in any U.S. state, a federal court can exercise personal jurisdiction if doing so is consistent with the laws and the Constitution of the United States. The analysis of personal jurisdiction in those cases considers minimum contacts and due process, much like the analysis of personal jurisdiction within a state. However, the defendant’s contacts are evaluated with respect to the United States as a whole, rather than with a single forum state.

53
Q

Must a forum-selection clause be fundamentally fair to be valid?

A

Yes. To be valid, a forum-selection clause must be fundamentally fair. This does not mean that the parties must expressly negotiate the forum-selection clause; for example, it can be included on the back of a travel ticket or in a software-licensing agreement.

However, a forum-selection clause might be unfair if it is the product of fraud or excessively one-sided bargaining power. A clause might also be unfair if it discourages litigation by specifying an alien or inconvenient forum. On the other hand, a clause that benefits consumers by lowering costs may be more likely to be considered fair.

54
Q

What effect does a valid forum-selection clause have on personal jurisdiction in the selected forum?

A

A valid forum-selection clause is a form of consent to personal jurisdiction in the designated forum state.

55
Q

What is the sliding-scale test, also called the Zippo test, for Internet-based minimum contacts?

A

Interactivity to determine purposeful availment and minimum contacts in analyzing personal jurisdiction. At one end are websites through which a company and customers exchange information and transact business. These sites are highly interactive and likely provide minimum contacts for personal jurisdiction between the site owner and the state where the consumer accesses the site.

At the other end are so-called passive websites. These are not specifically directed at the forum state. These sites merely provide information and do not allow business transactions. Passive websites usually do not provide the minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction. Between the extremes, other evidence of purposeful availment may be relevant in assessing personal jurisdiction.

56
Q

Under the Supreme Court’s nerve-center test, where is a corporation’s principal place of business?

A

A corporation’s principal place of business is the location of the company’s corporate headquarters or similar place where top management makes major decisions. (Daimler)

57
Q

What does “state of domicile” mean?

A

The state of domicile is the state in which the person has her principal home, with the intent to remain indefinitely.

58
Q

When does specific jurisdiction exist?

A

Specific jurisdiction exists only if the defendant has sufficient minimum contacts to satisfy due process.

59
Q

When does general jurisdiction exist?

A

General jurisdiction exists only if the defendant has continuous and systematic contacts with the forum state, such that the defendant is at home there.

60
Q

What are some examples of continuous and systematic contacts for corporations within a forum state?

A

Examples of continuous and systematic contacts for corporations include, but are not limited to, incorporation in the forum state or the presence of the corporate headquarters in the forum state.

62
Q

What is an example of continuous and systematic contacts for an individual within a forum state?

A

An example of continuous and systematic contacts for individuals are if they are domiciled in the forum state.

63
Q

What private issues must a court consider for proper venue?

A

(1) Plaintiff’s choice of forum, unless the balance of convenience is strongly in favor of the defendants
(2) Defendant’s choice of forum
(3) Whether the claim arose elsewhere
(4) Convenience of the parties
(5) Convenience of the witnesses
(6) Ease of access to sources of proof

64
Q

What public issues must a court consider for proper venue?

A

(1) Transferee’s familiarity with governing laws
(2) Relative congestion of the calendars of the potential transferee and transferor courts
(3) Local interest in deciding local controversies at home

65
Q

What are the federal rules governing venue? 28 U.S.C S1391(b)

A

A civil action may be brought in:

(1) A judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the state in which the district is located
(2) A judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the clam occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated
(3) If there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action