Perianal tumors Flashcards
Perianal tumors represent what % of tumors in dogs and cats?
17% of all perianal malignancies in dogs; 2% and 0.5% (rare) of all skin and SQ tumors in dogs and cats
List 5 dogs breeds and risk and cat breed at risk
English cocker spaniels, other spaniels, dachshunds, GSD and Alaskan malamutes; Siamese cats.
Sex predilection
No sex predilection, neutering may be associated with increased risk in males
Mean age in dogs? cats?
9-11 years in dogs (as young as 5 yo, so always check the anal sacs on PE) and 13 in cats
List the 3 histological patterns of AGASACA?
95% are either classified as solid (closely packed cancer cells w/o much stroma)
tubules/rosettes (cancer cells arranged radially around a central tubule or vessel)
less commonly papillary
What is the biological behaivour of AGASACA?
locally invasive disease with moderate to high risk of local recurrence after surgery and a moderate to high metastatic rate in dogs and cats
Are AGASACA unilateral or bilateral tumor?
Bilateral incidence in dogs? cats?
Usually unilateral tumors
bilateral incidence is 14% for dogs and 0% for cats, includes temporarily separated
What are the 2 reported paraneoplastic syndromes associated with AGASACA?
hypercalcemia (caused by tumor secretion of PTHrP) seen in 16%-53% of dogs and 11% of cats
hypertrophic osteopathy (2 dogs with pulmonary mets)
Is metastasis common at diagnsosis? How common?
Regional LN metastasis?
Distant site metastasis and sites?
List risk factors for metastasis?
Common at diagnosis (26-96% in dogs, variable in cats), even when primary is small (<1cm).
Regional LN: (26-89% in dogs, 20% in cats) most commonly to the sacral and sublumbar nodes (medial and internal iliacs) and can show variable metastatic patterns (as evidenced by CT lymphography) not always following lymphatic drainage linearly from the perineum and sometimes skipping LNs.
Distant sites: (0-42%) lungs, liver, spleen and bone and less commonly “anywhere else” (including BM in 4 dogs)
Risk factors for metastasis: presence of clinical signs (vs tumor as incidental finding), marked peripheral infiltration, lymphovascular invasion (vs mitotic index and necrosis).
Some important genes and proteins in AGASACA
TSG: E-cadherin (overexpression associated with increased survival), p53 (expression detected w/o clinical implications)
o COX-2: detected in all tumor samples (expression was high in 12% and moderate in 36%), but also in normal anal sacs. Neuroendocrine differentiation proteins: synaptophysin, chromogranin A, neuro-specific enolase (30% expression).
o TKR: Urie et al (BMC Vet Res, 2012) detected VEGFR-2, PDGFR-a and 13, KIT and RET mRNA in all 25 tumor samples; but IHC detection was less consistent (most expressed VEGFR2, PDGFR-a and PDGFR-13, but only 1/3 KIT).
Two other possible anal sac tumors?
o Melanomas: 1 case series (n=11 dogs) by Vinayak et al (JSAP, 2017) documented moderate to aggressive unilateral tumors, with a mean size >3cm, a median mitotic index of 50/10 HPF, with metastasis to the LN (4/11) and lungs (1/11) at diagnosis, all presenting clinical signs (bleeding) and 10/11dying due to PD in only 107 days (MST).
o SCC: reports document unilateral tumors with no evidence of metastasis but do mention local recurrence.
IHC markers for AGASACA?
Cytokeratin+ (CK7+/CK14-), but usually not needed for diagnosis.
Mainstay therapy for AGASACA?
Surgical resection which is marginal
Complications with anal sacculectomy?
rate of 5-24% (related to tumor size and % of anal circumference resected), most common are dehiscence +/- infection, rectal perforation, fistulae formation and different degrees of fecal incontinence (especially if > 50% of the sphincter muscle is resected, old/very aggressive study reports a 19% rate out of which 60% was permanent).
What are the advantages and disadvantages for metastatic lymphadenectomy which is recommended for sublumbar and sacral LN?
Advantages: improve quality of life (by relieving pelvic canal obstruction and helping with hypercalcemia) and survival in some studies (Polton et al, JVIM 2007), but the opposite effect is reported in other studies (Potanas, JAVMA 2015).
Disadvantages: requires a second surgical approach (abdominal +/- pelvic osteotomy), has a complication rate of 012% which include severe infra-op hemorrhage which may require transfusion (LNs closely associated with aorta and caudal vena cava). Palliative RT has been proven more effective/tolerated in advanced cases.