Performance Standards Flashcards
What 4 arguments can you use to avoid finding a condition?
- Wrongful prevention
- Equitable estoppel
- Waiver
- Disproportionate forfeiture
What is wrongful prevention?
When a party prevents fulfillment of a condition of his own obligation.
What is equitable estoppel?
When a party reasonably relies on an inducing statement of another to his detriment.
What is waiver?
When a party’s words and actions reasonably justify condition waiver, such waiver has been established and cannot be revoked. (use as defense against forfeiture)
When is disproportionate forfeiture granted?
When a party:
(a) requests equitable relief in exercising a contractual right,
(b) his forfeiture outweighs the other party’s prejudice, and
(c) his failure was inadvertent.
Forfeiture must stand or lie with condition.
What is disproportionate forfeiture?
When a breaching party stands to suffer/lose substantially more than the other party stands to gain by adhering to the K terms.
Rest 2d §229 Disproportionate Forfeiture analysis
Unless a condition was a material part of the agreed upon exchange, a court may find no condition in order to avoid forfeiture.
Analysis:
1. Will s suffer forfeiture?
2. Did D enter into another K in reliance?
3. s, was this intentional or strategic move?
4. D, did you lull s into false sense of security?
What 5 factors determine substantial performance?
(a) will injured party be deprived of a reasonably expected benefit?
(b) can injured party reasonably be compensated for that benefit?
(c) will party failing to perform suffer forfeiture - extent?
(d) the likelihood the failing party will cure his failure, and
(e) did party failing to perform comport with standards of good faith and fair dealing?
Did breaching party substantially comply with contract terms? (2 factors)
(a) was breach in good faith?
(b) was compliance substantial
i. defects not pervasive,
ii. don’t signal a deviation from the general plan
iii. not so essential that they frustrate Ks purpose
How can you tell whether a multipart contract is severable?
Did the parties agree to all promises as a single whole?
What is the UCC perfect tender rule?
Every breach gets $ damages but a material breach excuses performance.
Under UCC PTR, If goods or tender of delivery fail in any respect to conform to the contract, the buyer may:
(a) reject the whole,
(b) accept the whole,
(c) accept only conforming units + reject the rest.
What constitutes acceptance under the perfect tender rule?
(1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer
(a) after a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods
(i) signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming, or
(ii) that he will keep them in spite of their non-conformity; or
(b) fails to make an effective rejection, or
(2) does any act inconsistent with the seller’s ownership.
Under the UCC perfect tender rule when can you reject goods?
Within a “reasonable” timeframe following delivery with “seasonable” notice.
Under the UCC perfect tender rule, what factors determine a reasonable timeframe for rejection?
A reasonable timeframe is determined by:
(a) Difficulty in determining defect,
(b) K terms,
(c) Perishability of goods,
(d) Course of performance after sale, before rejection.