Performance, Breach, Discharge Flashcards

1
Q

Performance (CL)

A
  • one has to substantially perform one’s duties in order for the other’s duty to arise
    -exception = express conditions that must be complied with exactly
    ~ most are constructive conditions = substantial performance is enough
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Performance (UCC)

A
  • Seller must provide PERFECT TENDER of the goods otherwise Buyer can reject goods
    -if no perfect tender + Buyer rejects = Seller has automatic right to cure ONLY IF:
    ~time left to perform under the K; OR
    ~Seller reasonably believed that Buyer would accept nonconforming foods with or without money allowance aka discount (ex. seller sent better goods than contracted for)
  • Exception = installment contracts = Buyer may reject installment if there is a SUBSTANTIAL IMPAIRMENT and the seller cannot cure the installment
  • if buyer accepts goods, he may not reject them BUT he can later revoke acceptance —- revocation is higher standard than rejection as it requires showing that the defect substantially impairs the value of the goods to him
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Delivery Obligations (carrier)

A
  • carrier cases:
    ~ FOB Seller’s Place of Business = seller only has to get the goods to the shipper and risk of loss passes to buyer then (shipment K)
    ~ FOB Buyer’s Place of Business = seller has to get goods to the destination (destination K)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Delivery Obligations (non-carrier)

A
  • if seller is merchant = seller must actually deliver the goods to the buyer for ROL to pass
  • if seller NOT merchant = seller must tender delivery (i.e. make the goods available) for the ROL to pass
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Delivery obligations — breach

A

if the seller is in breach, the ROL is on the seller until the defective goods are cured by the seller or accepted by the buyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Excusing Performance and Conditions

A
  • party excused from performing if the other party breaches
  • anticipatory repudiation: when a party unequivocally breaches —> other party can sue immediately, suspend performance and wait to sie, treat K as discharged, or urge party to perform

-prospective inability to perform: when party has reasonably grounds for insecurity that the other will not perform the insecure party can demand adequate assurances that performance will take place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Discharging duties

A
  1. occurrence of a condition subsequent = condition that cuts off a duty
  2. agreement =
    • novation: new party steps into shoes of existing party
    • modification
    • release
    • accord and satisfaction: parties agree to new or different consideration
    • rescission: contract is undone
  3. frustration of purpose: primary purpose of K known by both parties at time of contracting is substantially frustrated by an unforeseeable event that occurred after the K was entered into
  4. impossibility: an event renders performance impossible that occurs after the K was made, it was not reasonably foreseeable at time of contracting, nonoccurence was a basic assumption of the parties, neither party is at fault, and neither party bears the risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Warranties

A
  1. express: affirmations of fact about the goods or a sample of goods —- CANNOT be disclaimed (puffery does not create this warranty)
  2. implied warranty of merchantability: made by merchant and warrants that goods are fit for their ordinary purpose —- CAN be disclaimed (ex. “as is”)
  3. implied warranty of fitness: for particular purpose can be made by any seller who knows of buyer’s specific purpose and the buyer relies on the seller — CAN be disclaimed (seller does not need to be merchant)
  4. limitation of remedies clause: provision that limits/controls remedies —- enforceable unless it is unconscionable or it fails of its essential purpose
    ~ unconscionable if it attempts to limit/avoid paying consequential damages for a personal injury due to a consumer product
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly