Peremptory and directory provisions CH 8 Flashcards
Peremptory Provisions
1) A statutory provision which requires exact compliance.
2) Failure to comply with a peremptory provision will leave the ensuring act (action or conduct) null and void
Van Dyk
The court emphasised that these
categories are merely guidelines: what is important is the
purpose of the provisions in question, as well as the
consequences if the statutory requirements are not strictly
adhered to
City of Johannesburg case
The courts generally
follow a text-in-context (purposive) approach to the
interpretation of peremptory and directory provisions
Directory Provisions
1) A statutory provision requiring on substantial compliance
2) Non-compliance with a
directory provisions will not result in the ensuing act (action or
conduct) being null and void.
Nkisimane v Santam
Insurance Co Ltd 1978 (2) SA 430 (A) the court held that
the intention of the legislature is always the decisive factor
Semanitic Guidelines
1) Based on the grammatical meaning of the language used in the provision
2) A word or words with an imperative or affirmative character indicate a peremptory provision.
3) Does not necessarily indicate a peremptory meaning.
4) Permissive words (such as ‘may’) indicate a discretion and will be interpreted as being directory, unless the purpose of the provision indicates otherwise
5) Positive language suggests that the provision is merely directory.
6) Words in negative form indicate a peremptory connotation.
7) If the provision is formulated in flexible or vague terms, it is
an indication that it is directory
Motorvoertuigassuransiefonds v Gcwabe
The court found that the word shall does not necessarily
indicate a peremptory meaning.
Must
Has imperative and affirmative character
Sutter v Scheepers and Pio v Franklin
1) Certain tests or guidelines were proposed to determine whether
provisions are peremptory or directory.
2) If the wording is positive and there is no penal sanction (punishment) it is an indication of it being merely
directory.
Jurisprudential guidelines
Legal principles which have been developed and formulated by the courts
Johannesburg City Council v Arumugan
If strict compliance with the statutory provision would lead to injustice or fraud (and there is no express provision providing for it being null and void or a penalty) it is presumed that the provision is directory.
Standard Bank v Estate
van Rhyn
On the other hand, the addition of a
penal clause may be an indication that the legislature intended the penalty to be sufficient and that the act should
not be declared null and void as well
Bpk v Anderson 1966
If the validity of the act would defeat the purpose of the
legislation, this is an indication that an act (conduct) should be null and void.
1) Presumptions about Specific Circumstances
1) Where legislation protects the public revenue, a presumption against nullity
exists, even if a penal clause has been added.
2) Presumption
Where the freedom of an individual is at stake, the court will stress the peremptory nature of a requirement.