Perceptual and Sensor motor development Flashcards

1
Q

Outline Perceptual development at birth

A

Least developed sense at birth – VISUAL PROCESSING AS WELL AS STRUCTURE OF THE EYE 
• Visual Acuity: Sharpness of vision; clarity that fine details can be detected (e.g., Maurer & Maurer, 1988) 
• Newborn 
• Can distinguish visual forms if close enough 
• 20/400 vision (really bad vision) 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline visual acuity at 6months and 8months

outline colour perception at newborn adn 2-4 months

A

Visual Acuity 
• 6 mo: Acuity approximates normal adult vision 
• 8 mo: More interest in distant objects, tiny objects

  Colour Perception
 • Newborn: Prefer colour to grey 
• 2-4 mo: See full colour spectrum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the preferential looking method and pattern perception

A

Looking chamber Fantz (1961). © David Linton- INfaAT LIES DOWN- PRESENT 2 DIFFERENT STIMULI- IF iNFANT SPENDS MORE TIME LOOKING AT one thing moreso than the other we know the infnat knows they’re different.
Paired stimuli Fantz & Nevis (1967) © Wayne State University Press

Pattern Perception
 • Newborn: Prefer patterns to plain stimuli 
• 2 mo: Prefer more complex patterns to simpler ones
• Toy design…any benefit past 6 mo?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ourline visual scanning

A
Visual scanning
 • Eye tracking method
 • Prefer high-contrast areas 
• 1 mo: Edges
 • 2 mo: Internal features 
• Sticky fixation: Difficulty disengaging visual attention away from one feature to focus on another
 • 6 mo: Adult-like scanning
Maurer & Salapatek (1976
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline the improvement in how infants see shapes

A

Perceiving parts vs. wholes (e.g., Cohen & Younger, 1983)
• Not just edges & corners, but whole shape
• Improves over 1st yr •
4 mo: See subjective contours
Perceiving parts vs. wholes
• 12 mo: Recognise incomplete line drawings (Rose et al., 1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Habituation in terms of infant visual development

A

A form of learning reflected in a decrease in the strength of response to a repeated stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline infant facial perception

A

Nature: Newborns track faces more than other stimuli (Johnson et al., 1991)
• Nurture: This bias gives them much experience with faces

  • 2-4 mo: Prefer more complex facial stimuli; prefer mother’s face; discriminate individual faces
  • 5-12 mo: Discriminate emotional expressions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline Depth Perception in infants

3 points

A
  1. Kinetic cues (1 mo)- cues coming from motion
     • Motion parallax: Nearby objects appear to move faster than distant ones 
  2. Binocular cues (3-5 mo) 
    • Disparity: Brain perceives depth when combining slightly different angle from each eye
  3. Pictorial cues (5-7 mo)
     • Interposition: An object that overlaps another appears nearer (Granrud & Yonas, 1984)
     • Linear perspective: Parallel lines appear to converge in distance (Arterberry et al., 1991) 
    • Relation between depth perception development and motor development? 
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Outline the Visual Cliff and what it means

A

• Visual Cliff (Gibson & Walk, 1960)
 • Nature-nurture research- different species- which ones would cross which ones don’t- when born
 • Compare depth perception in infants of different species 
• Humans: More crawling experience= more avoidance of cliff
e.g. Baby walkers- now banned
Everytime babies learn new form of locamotion relearn depth perception e.g. will stop at a edge when crawling but when walking will walk right off. 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline Auditory developmenet threshhold

A

• More mature at birth than vision
• Auditory threshold: Quietest sound can hear (e.g., Aslin et al., 1998) 
• Newborns less sensitive than adults to quietest sounds
 • Most sensitive to sounds in range of speech 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outline Infant Auditory Localisation

A

• Localisation (e.g., Clifton, 1992)
 • Newborn: Turn head towards sound 
• 7 mo: Know when sounding object in dark is within reach (will reach for it if it’s 15cm away and won’t if it’s 60cm away) 
 • 2 yr: Adult-like Perceptual Development: Hearing
Use preferential observational behaviours to detect whether infants enjoy or dislike stimuli…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline Music in infant

A

Music (e.g., Trainor & Heinmiller, 1998) 
• Newborn: Prefer music to nonmelodic sounds
 • 4-6 mo: Prefer more common chords 
• 6 mo: Distinguish Western vs. non-Western music scales

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline Speech perception in Infants

A

Speech (e.g., DeCasper & Spence, 1986)
 • Newborns suck preferentially to hear: 
• Infant-directed speech (motherese)
 • Voice of mother vs. stranger 
• Familiar rhyme heard during last 6 weeks of pregnancy vs. novel rhyme

Younger infant prefer familiar- if delay between stimuli will also prefer familiar- emotional stimuli also skews
Old Vs. New

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline Taste perception in infants

A
  • Newborn: Detect 4  main tastes from 2 hrs old (& prefer sweet) 
  • Survival value

 • 4 mo: Prefer salty to plain

Done by detecting facial expression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline Smell in infants

A

(e.g. Rosenstein & Oster, 1988)
• Innate?: Universal facial expressions for pleasant (sweet) vs. unpleasant (rotten/fishy) odours 
• Newborns prefer familiar odours 
• Amniotic fluid
 • Breast milk
 • Perfume
Make sense- as if threatened in wild- recognition from smell 
Diet during pregnancy effects bbaies familiarity of smell e..g garlic or annis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline touch as an infant sense

A

• Pain
 • Same pain receptors as adults
 • Circumcision (Gunnar et al., 1985) cried, stress hormones in blood, increase in heartrate- indicative of pain
 • Object discrimination (Streri et al., 2000) habituate to objects as well iin ters of tactile behaviour- drop it if over stimulated. 

Can now use local anaesthesia- general anaesthesia is risky 
Pressure, texture, temperature, moisture
 • Face, hands & feet most sensitive
Helps physical growth e.g. stimulation on preterm babies to help them gain weight

17
Q

outline 4 essenstial newborn reflexes

A
Rooting 
Sucking 
Swallowing 
Swimming 
Reflex: Involuntary response to external stimulation (e.g., McGraw, 1940)
18
Q

outline 4 non-essentail newborn reflexes

A
Nonessential (don't stay and not obvious what evolutionary advantage they give)  
Moro (startle) 
Gripping (palmar grasp) 
Stepping 
Babinski
19
Q

What is Cot death or SIDS?

A

Cot Death or SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome)  
2016 1 in ever 3,200 die
Unexplained sudden death of infant less than 1 year, usually during sleep
• Critical Period: Risk at 1-4 months when reflexes wane • Respiratory occlusion reflex
• Vulnerable Infant: Often physical problems from birth (e.g., LBW)
• External ‘Stressor’ (e.g., exposure to smoking, sleep position)

20
Q

Outline the back to sleep campaign

A

SIDS: Back to Sleep Campaign in US
79% reduction in cot death since 1991
Now advised to put nothing in cot- don’t share bed with baby
Put to sleep on back

21
Q

give two motor development patterns

A
  • Cephalocaudal (head to tail): Motor control proceeds from head to toe
  • Proximodistal (near to far): Motor control proceeds from trunk to limbs
22
Q

outline the sequence of an infants fine motor hand skill

A

Proximodistal: Arms, hands, fingers 
• Newborn: Pre-reaching (e.g., von Hofsten, 2004)
 • 3-4 mo: Goal-directed reaching 
• 5 mo: Grasp anticipates object orientation (e.g., Lockman, 1981) 
• 9 mo • Anticipate object size
• 18 mo: Tool use (e.g., use spoon to feed self; McCarty et al., 2001)