PEP - Week 6 Quiz Flashcards

QUIZ

1
Q

What is the Test for recklessness ?

A

realisation of the POSSIBILITY that injury can happen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of actual bodily harm?

A

More than Transient or trifling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What example of acts amounts to a lawful excuse or can be consented to?

A

Contact sporting games, accidental etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What test is applied to self-defence?

A

objective/subjective – both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When can words constitute an assault?

A

Whenthere is an Immediate apprehension of violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q. True or False?
Child abuse material CAN include cartoon depictions of a person who appears to be a child as a victim of torture, cruelty or physical abuse.

A

TRUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the three bases for establishing knowledge of the absence of consent under s61HK Crimes Act:

A
  1. Actual Knowledge,
  2. Recklessness,
  3. Hybrid subjective/objective test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

True or False?
A sexual ACT does not include an act of TOUCHING carried out in circumstances that a reasonable person would consider the act to be sexual (this equates to a Sexual TOUCHING offence as opposed to a sexual ACT.

A

FALSE- if it involved touching it should be sexual touching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the standard of proof under Section 142 Evidence Act – admissibility of evidence?

A

Balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1st leg submissions relate to a question of what?

A

Law
(COULD?)
The strength of the prosecution case at its highest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2nd leg submissions relate to a question of what?

A

Fact
(SHOULD?)
The submissions covering strength of the prosecution case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which leg in prima facie submissions can the defence call their client?

A

1st leg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In attempts -is there a impossibility defence?

A

No longer is a defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attempts - explain specific intent requirement.

A

The requirement is an intention to commit the complete offence. The offence MUST be a crime of specific intent. We cannot use an attempt provision for Offences of recklessness/negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the definition of an attempt?

A

An attempt to commit a crime is an act done with intent to commit that crime, and forming part of a series of acts which would constitute its actual commission if it were not interrupted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does a 257 certificate contain Hearsay?

A

No, section 59 (3).

17
Q

What’s the legislative term for the Hearsay purpose?

A

The asserted fact purpose.

18
Q

Is Section 60 an exception to the Hearsay rule?

A

Only if the evidence has already been admitted.

S.60 (1) – the hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation THAT IS ADMITTED because it is relevant for a purpose other than proof of an asserted fact.

19
Q

The 3 part test in Hearsay rule is?

A
  1. Previous representation
  2. By a person
  3. For proof of its asserted facts.