Pension Transfer Chp 4 Impact Of Transferring Risk Flashcards
Implications of transferring PCLS?
“Under the simplified regime in place post-A-Day, the general limit for the PCLS when benefits are drawn is 25% of the value of the benefits or 25% of the available lifetime allowance, whichever is lower.”
“One of the main reasons for a client wishing to transfer out of their existing defined benefit scheme and into a defined contribution (DC) scheme is to access their PCLS earlier than would otherwise be the case and/or to choose from a wider range of income and lump sum options either now or at a future date.”
“There is a strong possibility that those individuals seeking to maximise the amount of their PCLS would receive a higher tax-free lump sum following their transfer into a money purchase arrangement. This is because, as stated previously in Defined benefit schemes and safeguarded benefits, the commutation factors used by private sector DB schemes when calculating PCLS are not very generous. If the member chooses to postpone taking their PCLS, they may well receive an even greater amount of PCLS as their fund will have potentially grown by the time they seek to take their tax-free lump sum.”
Bridging Pensions; Implications of transferring?
“When the member reaches their normal pension age a higher pension is paid until SPA is reached”
“A bridging pension would not be available via a money purchase scheme. However, where the member is seeking to take their retirement income before they reach their SPA, then they can, should they wish, enter into flexi-access drawdown and take a higher level of withdrawals for those years leading up to their SPA, whereupon they reduce their income withdrawals to reflect the receipt of their State Pension.”
Early retirement; Implications of transferring?
“Having transferred the member’s pension to a money purchase scheme the member may find that they have an improved position if they were to retire early when compared with doing so under their existing DB scheme. This will depend on the early retirement factors being applied by their existing scheme, and the age at which they seek to retire early.”
Ill health early retirement: Implications of transferring?
“Having transferred the member’s pension to a money purchase scheme, the pension available to the individual when retiring early due to ill-health will be determined by the age at which they take their pension, the size of the pension fund and the income/lump sum option selected.
A money purchase scheme member who satisfies the ill-health early retirement rule is usually eligible for an impaired life annuity because of the seriousness of their medical condition. Whether it makes sense to buy an annuity (after drawing the PCLS) depends on the member’s personal circumstances.
If the need for secure lifetime income is the priority, then there may be no alternative. If a beneficiary’s annuity is also to be purchased, then the overall rate may not be much better than a standard annuity. The higher mortality of the member will be reflected in a higher price for the beneficiary’s annuity.
For many, flexi-access drawdown may be a better option because:
it offers unrestricted income; and
any remaining fund on death before age 75 can be passed on free of income tax (and usually inheritance tax (IHT)).
However, if the member lives for longer than anticipated, the drawdown fund will run out.
Income Options?
“There are four methods of retirement income provision from the receiving money purchase scheme:
- Scheme pension, which is the only route for DB schemes, but is an option for all other types of pension arrangement.
- Lifetime annuity, payable by an insurance company.
- Drawdown pension, which includes capped drawdown and flexi-access drawdown.
- UFPLS, taking part or all of the pension fund as a lump sum.”
Scheme Pensions?
“DB arrangements can only provide income benefits in the form of scheme pensions.
Money purchase arrangements have the option of offering scheme pensions, but are not required to do so. A money purchase arrangement is only allowed to pay a scheme pension if the member was given the option to select a lifetime annuity as an alternative and rejected it. Few money purchase arrangements offer a scheme pension, as they are not considered mainstream.
Small self-administered schemes (SSASs) and some self-invested personal pension (SIPP) schemes with typically “few members, such as family SIPPs, offer scheme pensions, although those offering are becoming fewer in number. The main attraction is the potential to reduce the lifetime allowance applied to the value of the funds backing a scheme pension. This application can work when the scheme pension is paid directly from a SSAS or SIPP, but this is seen as complex and costly. Therefore, these are seen as only relevant for high net worth individuals who have significant money purchase funds and issues with the lifetime allowance.”
Lifetime Annuity?
“Annuity rates are based on the life expectancy of the annuitant, and traditionally a key factor was gender. Following the European Court of Justice Test-Achats case, with effect from 21 December 2012 all insurance contracts were required to calculate benefits and premiums without reference to gender. Included in this ruling are lifetime annuities”
“In particular, it may be suitable for individuals who:
have a low appetite for risk;
have low, or no, capacity for loss;
need a guaranteed income (for themselves and/or their survivors);
have no desire to manage the investment of their pension fund in retirement;
have a longer life expectancy based on family history; and/or
have a medical condition that will allow them to be underwritten and receive an enhanced annuity rate.”
Lifetime Annuity v Scheme Pension:
Refer page 126-127.
Drawdown?
“From 6 April 2015 there are two forms of drawdown:
Flexi-access drawdown
Only option available to a member wishing to commence drawdown from 6 April 2015.
(Note: a previous option was flexible drawdown. Anyone in flexible drawdown hadtheir pension automatically converted to a flexi-access drawdown pension on 5April2015.)
Capped drawdown
Only available to members who were already in capped drawdown on 5 April 2015.
Both of these drawdown options allow the member to make use of short-term annuities.”
What are Short term annuities?
“Short-term annuities are also sometimes referred to as temporary annuities. They work as follows:
After drawing the PCLS, the bulk of the member’s pension fund is (or remains) invested in their chosen funds, but a portion is used to buy a temporary annuity in the name of the member.
Income must be paid at least yearly.
The short-term annuity must be payable by an insurance company. Since 6 April 2015 there has been no requirement for the pension provider to provide an open market option.
There is no restriction on the level of income. Short-term annuities purchased before 6 April 2015 were subject to a maximum initial income cap calculated on the same basis as drawdown pension. The cap remains in place unless the member”
“opts for flexi-access treatment.
Income reviews on pre-6 April 2015 capped short-term annuities follow the same pattern as drawdown pension, i.e. after every three years from commencement (every year from age 75), but with an interim adjustment to the maximum payment level if a new annuity is purchased or part of an arrangement is designated for this form of drawdown income.
The annuity cannot be payable for a term of more than five years.
It can be arranged on an annuity certain basis for its full term (i.e. guaranteed), but otherwise cannot incorporate any death benefits.
It may be transferred to another insurance company.
For short-term annuities purchased since 6 April 2015, the income may decrease. However, older short-term annuities are subject to the same restrictions as pre-6 April 2015 lifetime annuities subject to any maximum income limit.
At current rates, a large part of the fund must be crystallised to buy the annuity. The cost may be very similar to the sum total of gross income payments, which puts pressure on managing the portfolio. As the market is underdeveloped – and likely to remain so in a world of flexi-access – rates are unlikely to be competitive.
Flexi-access Drawdown: Benefits and Drawbacks
Refer page 132
Capped Drawdown:
“Capped drawdown ceased to be available for most new crystallisations from 6 April 2015, when it was replaced by flexi-access drawdown. However, a member with capped drawdown started before that date can continue to take capped drawdown. The existing review process (every three years to the pension year in which the member reaches their 75th birthday and annually thereafter) remains and the 150% limit of the basis amount also continues. If a withdrawal that results in the cap being exceeded is made, the capped drawdown fund is automatically converted to a flexi-access drawdown fund, thereby avoiding it being an unauthorised payment and the associated tax charge.
In any event, the member can elect for any new drawdown to be on a flexi-access basis, or for their capped drawdown to be converted to flexi-access drawdown, and then designate new funds under flexi-access. While the latter option would dispense with the administrative issues (and cost) surrounding reviews, it may not be the wisest course of action, because capped drawdown does not trigger the MPAA, so potentially allowing £10,000-plus annual contributions to be made to money purchase arrangements.
“While capped drawdown is in use, further uncrystallised funds within the same arrangement can be designated to capped drawdown. It is theoretically possible to top up existing arrangements in capped drawdown, so the member can continue to benefit from its features. Any further uncrystallised funds that the member has can be designated into their existing capped drawdown pension arrangement provided the arrangement was set up to allow for the designation of additional funds.”
Capped Drawdown setting the income maximum:
“Capped withdrawals are subject to a maximum level but no minimum, so were sometimes previously used to draw PCLS in isolation (as flexi-access can be used now). The maximum level was changed under the Finance Act 2014 to 150% of a basis amount. This is calculated from a set of drawdown tables produced for HMRC by GAD based on 15-year gilt yields (unless the withdrawal is for a dependant aged under 23, in which case 5-year gilt yields are used).
The latest version of these tables is dated 2011. Following the principle of gender equality established in the European Court of Justice Test-Achats case, since 21 December 2012 only male rates have been used.
The calculation for the maximum withdrawal level (other than for dependants under age 23) was (and for reviews still is) as follows:
Calculate the attained age in complete years at the date the drawdown pension fund option becomes effective (the initial ‘reference date’).
“Obtain the gross redemption yield on UK gilts (15 years) from the FTSE Actuaries Government Securities Yield Indices (published daily in the Financial Times) for the 15th of the month preceding the month in which the withdrawal option becomes effective.
If the 15th is not a working day, use the working day immediately preceding the 15th. For example, if the calculation was to be effective from 23 August 2016, the yield referred to will be that of Friday 15 July 2016, published on the Financial Times website on 16 July 2016.
If the yield is not an exact multiple of 0.25%, round it down to the next 0.25%. No rounding is necessary for exact multiples. Prior to 18 January 2017, the 15-year gilt yields contained in the GAD tables only went as low as 2%, however, from 18 January 2017 this has been extended to include gilt yields as low as 0%, though this extension to the GAD table only came into use from 1 July 2017.
“Using the age from step 1 and yield from step 3, look up the relevant basis amount per £1,000 in the GAD table 1 for males (table 2 for females is now obsolete, following the removal of gender in calculations). To calculate the basis amount, multiply the relevant basis amount by the available fund and then divide by £1,000.
To determine the maximum withdrawal, apply 150% to the basis amount. The result may be rounded to the nearest penny”
Capped Drawdown: Review Procedure
“The maximum income level under capped drawdown must be recalculated at least every three years after the initial reference date and prior to age 75. This three-year period is called a reference period. The new reference period must start on the same date in the year as the original reference period. For example, for a drawdown plan that started on 1 November 2014, the next reference period will start on 1 November 2017. There are, however, certain events that can cause the reference period to change, and other events that will trigger the recalculation of the maximum drawdown pension but will not change the reference period.
When the scheme administrator calculates the maximum drawdown pension at review, it uses the method outlined in example 4.5. When initially setting income, the value on that date is used, but on review the scheme administrator can carry out the calculation on any day in the 60-day period ending on the first day of the new review period. So, if the next review date is 1 November 2017, the scheme administrator can do the calculation in the period from 3 September 2017 to 1November2017.
“If the scheme administrator selects a date within the 60-day window, this is known as the nominated date. The age, fund value and gilt yield that apply at the nominated date are used to calculate the maximum drawdown pension for the next reference period. On attaining age 75, the review is moved to an annual basis, starting with the first plan anniversary after age 75.
To ease administration, from age 75 onwards where the member has different arrangements with different anniversary dates, it will be possible – subject to the scheme administrator’s agreement – to align all the arrangements under the same pension year. Note that the anniversary date of an arrangement can only be changed once.”
Capped Drawdown, Benefits and Drawbacks:
Refer page 135