Pelagic & Substrate Bound Food Web Flashcards

1
Q

Osmotrophy

A

Osmotrophy is the uptake of dissolved organic compounds by osmosis for nutrition. Organisms that use osmotrophy are called osmotrophs. Some mixotrophic microorganisms use osmotrophy to derive some of their energy. Organisms that use osmotrophy include bacteria, many species of protists and most fungi.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Coexistence

A

The living together of two species (or organisms) in the same habitat, such that neither tends to be eliminated by the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Competitive exclusion principle

A

If two competing species coexist in a stable environment, then they do so as a result of niche differentiation, or if it is precluded by the habitat, then one competing species will eliminate or exclude the other. Thus, exclusion occurs when the realized niche of the superior competitor completely fills those parts of the inferior competitor’s fundamental niche which the habitat provides.

precluded- ausgeschlossen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Life history

A

An organism’s lifetime pattern of growth, differentiation, storage and reproduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Allometric relationship

A

A physical or physiological property of an organism alters relative to the size of the organism. Can be ontogenetic or phylogenetic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Allometry

A

The transfer of heat, water, gases or nutrients, either within or between an organism and its environment takes place across a surface, which has an area. The amount of heat produced or water required depends on the volume of the organ or organism. Hence changes in area:volume ratio resulting from changes in size are bound to lead to changes in the efficiency of transfer per unit volume. Thus, if efficiency is to be maintained, this must be done by allometric alterations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vertically alternating control

A

If the trophic level of primary production is bottom-up or top down-regulated depends on how many trophic levels exist (uneven number of levels: bottom-up, even number: top-down).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain how the characteristics of the pelagic food webs and arose from the physical properties of pelagic habitats

A

A continuous and uniform biomass size distribution is promoted by the correlation between physiological and ecological properties of the body size –> succession of ecotypes
Pelagic autotrophs are, among other things, small because growth does not lead to more light but increases the speed of sedimentation and mechanistic problems and decreases the surface to volume ratio (less competitive for nutrients)
The large size of pelagic predators is promoted by a lack of substrate for the fixation of the prey, increased possibilities of the prey to escape in a 3D space and an increase of the swimming speed with body size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name 3 principal differences between the pelagic and the substrate-bound

A

Pelagic:
1. There is a continuum of organisms along a logarithmically scaled size gradient,

  1. all autotrophs are relatively small and the feeding types overlap little in size
  2. the consumers are larger than their prey.

➔ Flow of energy and matter along a size gradient
➔ Increase of trophic position with body size
➔ This has wide-ranging consequences for the structure & functioning of pelagic food webs

Substrate-bound:

  1. uneven distribution of biomass
  2. autotrophs grow in competition of light very tall (building of structuring elements like cellulose)
  3. herbivores and predators vary largely in size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Specify the efficiency of consumption and assimilation for invertebrates, ectotherm vertebrates and endotherm vertebrates (first herbivores, then carnivores).

A

Assimilation efficiency: A/I
Net and gross growth efficiencies: P/A & P/I

Invertebrates:
A/I : 40%, 80%
P/A : 40%, 30%
P/I : 16%, 24%
Ectotherm vertebrates:
A/I : 50%, 80%
P/A : 10%, 10%
P/I : 5%, 8%
Endotherm vertebrates:
A/I : 50%, 80%
P/A : 2%, 2%
P/I : 1%, 1.6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain precisely how these differences affect the structure, function and dynamics of the respective food webs. Do this in a broad sense, e.g. consider also differences in the relative importance of the grazing and the detritus chain, number of trophic levels, efficiency to transfer energy up to higher trophic levels, response time to disturbances and mechanisms maintaining biodiversity.

A

In the pelagic energy flow from small to large organisms
→ Reaction time of trophic levels increases systematically → consistently slower response to disturbances at high TLs;
→ weight-specific metabolic activity decreases with TL → similar biomass on all TL feasible;
→ main material conversions by small organisms (pro- & eukaryotic unicellular organisms, simple multicellular organisms) → very high 𝑃𝐵, 𝑅𝐵, etc. → very rapid turn-over (e.g. of C, little storage), rapid large-scale distribution, high ind. numbers & diversity at the energetically important lower TLs
In the pelagic, greater consumption efficiency of autotrophic production, because (1) lower fiber content of autotrophs which is difficult to digest, as less supporting tissue required, (2) more favourable C:nutrient ratio (less supporting tissue & the higher mortality requires higher weight-specific growth rate which in turn requires higher cell quotas (i.e. 𝑃𝐶 ratios, cf. “growth rate hypothesis”)), (3) generally approximately 4 TL & thus top-down controlled autotrophic → lower importance of the detritus chain, greater importance of trophic interactions.
In the pelagic, typically 4 TL, in the terrestrial rather 3 TL
Therefore, according to the model of the trophic cascade in the pelagic, autotrophs are more top-down controlled (and thus lower biomass and higher 𝑃𝐵,) than in terrestrial systems.
The growth rate hypothesis predicts that organisms with higher maximum growth rates will also have higher phosphorus concentrations per unit biomass due to the increased demand for ribosomal RNA production needed to sustain rapid growth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain differences in the research approaches and priorities resulting from the differences between pelagic and substrate-based food webs. Which research questions can be studied particularly well in which systems?

A

→ Forest (grassland): dominant plants very high fibre content / difficult to digest, resulting in very low consumption efficiency (→ much autotrophic production dies before consumed) and low assimilation efficiency (→ high excretion). Both increases material flow directly from primary producers to detritus pool & reduces material flow into the grazing system. Primary production in the forest often difficult to use directly by herbivores because 1) high fibre content due to competition for light/length growth, 2) stoichiometrically unfavourable addition (strong competition in stable habitat and advanced successional stage; nutrient limitation leads to high C:nutrient ratio), 3). (grassland) usually, 3 TL clearly distinct, thus rather bottom-up controlled primary producers
→ Pelagic: roughly reversed
→ River: high allochthonous inputs of dead organic material (often already nutrient depleted) in comparison to autochthonous primary production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In which type of system does the 4th trophic level contribute relatively much to energy turnover and why?

A

In the pelagic, because of the body size gradient along the trophic levels:
Autotrophs 0.5-50μm – herbivores 100 μm - 2cm – Little planktivorous fish max. 20cm – piscivorous fish 20 cm - m
Shortening of the food chain energetically not possible in the pelagic as predator-prey weight ratios cannot exceed ca. 106 : 1 in weight (i.e. ca. 100:1 in length), in terrestrial ecosystems it is possible (e.g. predators hunt for great herbivores) also as there are autotrophs and herbivores of any size
In rivers, we have larger submerged macrophytes – bigger herbivores – shortening of food chain possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is meant by a biomass size spectrum? Which database is required and what can be learned about the respective system with this approach? What are the disadvantages of the approach?

A

Biomass size spectrum total metabolic activity (MA, expressed as production or respiration…) of communities summed up over all size classes (trophic continuum on an individual body size gradient)
MA = 𝑐𝑅 ∗Σ (𝑤𝑖−0.25 −𝐵𝑖 ) i… size class
𝑐𝑅 …constant of proportionality
Estimates metabolic activity of the community from biomass size spectrum
What can be learned about the system? Info about structure and function, slope of the biomass size spectrum is a measure for the transfer efficiency along the size gradient
Advantages: data collection easy, fast to calculate; few very general model assumptions and parameters; good forecasting capacity for general questions (for biomass and energy flow)
Disadvantages: little info on role of recycling, individual species and detritus/grazing chain; static model approach; allometric relationships neglect potential resource limitation including self-shadowing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by a binary food web? Which database is required and what can be learned about the respective system with this approach? What are the disadvantages of the approach?

A

Binary webs presence or absence of a feeding link , typical parameters: S…species number, L…number of feeding links, linkage density D = L/S, connectance C=L/S² (Lmax=S² or Lmax=S(S-1)/2 without cannibalism and direction), number of basal species, intermediate species and predators
What can be learned about the system? Qualitative analysis about the trophic structure, good approach to compare ecosystems. Number of links increases with number of species, connectance decreases → species-rich food web is less connected? Diversity leads to “stability” or not?! Cf. Diversity – stability debate
Advantages: precise information on food web structure, investigations from many different habitats available, no estimation of matter flow necessary, easy to analyse with graph theory
Disadvantages: system comparison and significance relatively strongly influenced by uneven aggregation of organisms, little info on functional aspects, static model approach, neglecting the generally largely differing quantity of fluxes lead to misleading interpretations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is meant by a mass-balanced flow diagram? Which database is required and what can be learned about the respective system with this approach? What are the disadvantages of the approach?

A

Mass-balance flow diagram: network analysis, quantitative concerning the carbon and nutrient cycles, energy and matter flow of the ecosystem during a certain time.

What can be learned about the system?
Detailed analyses about the cycles in complex food webs.
Advantages: accurate information on material flow, cycles, recycling and trophic structure; system comparison possible with well- defined indices; consisteny check of unmeasurable fluxes possible
Disadvantages: large data basis and detailed model assumption necessary, little direct insight into the regulation and casual relationships, mainly static approach

17
Q

What is meant by a dynamic simulation model? Which database is required and what can be learned about the respective system with this approach? What are the disadvantages of the approach?

A

dynamic simulation model – includes besides matter flows also their regulations
Definition of relevant state variables
Specification of their initial values (measured)
Specification of rules, how the state variables change from time step to time step (i.e. current understanding of the regulation of the dynamics of the system)
→ comparison of observed and simulated time series/patterns
→ current understanding of the system ‘probably’ correct or inconsistent with observations
What can be learned about the system?
Importance of an interaction do not have to be proportional to the matter flow e.g. pollination
Advantages: most efficient tool for comprehensive understanding of a system; comprehensive consistency check of measurements & hypothesis; principally very suitable to develop forecasts
Disadvantages: preparation of ‘reliable’ models requires interdisciplinary knowledge & experience; it’s easy to make mistakes, time-consuming

18
Q

Under which circumstances is it possible in autochthonous systems, even in the long term, that the biomass of the primary producers and the herbivores is approximately equal?

A

A given biomass of autotrophs can support a biomass of herbivores of about the same size if the 𝑃/𝐵 ratio of autotrophs is as much higher than the 𝑃/𝐵 ratio of herbivores as energy is lost during transfer from one trophic level to the next.
If no vertebrates are involved, the trophic transfer efficiency can be up to about 33%. Then the 𝑃/𝐵 of the autotrophs must be 3 times higher than that of the herbivores to sustain an equal biomass. This is possible if the autotrophs are significantly smaller than the herbivores.

19
Q

Which research approach would you take given a database of abundance and body size?

A

Biomass Size spectrum

20
Q

Which research approach would you take given a database of feeding relationships?

A

Binary webs, food web theory

21
Q

Which research approach would you take given a database of production and respiration?

A

Trophic webs, network analysis

22
Q

Which research approach would you take given a database of regulation of the flow on matter and energy?

A

Interaction webs, dynamic simulation models

23
Q

what is the most limiting nutrient in the marine realm?

A

Nitrogen

nitrogen fixation -> functional trait in phytoplankton species

24
Q

P/B= a*w^-0,25

A

In the given equation, P/B represents the ratio of primary productivity (P) to biomass (B) of an organism or ecosystem.

“a” represents a constant value, and “w” represents the body weight of the organism or the biomass component in the ecosystem. The exponent of -0.25 indicates that the weight of the organism or biomass has a relationship with the primary productivity but in an inverse power of 0.25.

This equation is used in ecological research to examine and quantify the relationship between productivity and biomass in ecosystems or within specific groups of organisms. It helps to analyze and understand the connections between growth and productivity of organisms or ecosystems.