PCCD Poging 2 Flashcards
Shared Decision Making
- The decision-making model is situated on a continuum between paternalism and consumerism.
- Physician is an expert in the medical field an the patient is an expertise on their life.
- Define problem, presemt options, discuss pros/cons, patient values/preferences, doctor recommendations, check understanding, make decision and arrange follow-up.
Shared decision making vs informed consent
Informed consent is an legal concept and shared decision making is an moral concept. Informed consent is therefore a must and shared decision making is desirable.
Three different talks SDM
Choice talk
There is exchange of information between a patient and his doctor, medical and personal information included.
Option talk
Possible options and outcomes are discussed and considered by patient and doctor.
Decision talk
Doctor and patient reach consensus about what needs to be done.
There is not one route.
Why SDM? Ethicists
The right of patients to determine what happens to their bodies is self-evident. SDM increases autonomy of the patient.
Why SDM? Economists
Increase in consumer power is a means to subject health care providers to market discipline. SDM will increase cost effectiveness.
Why SDM? Epidemiologists
Patients have an almost universal desire to be informed and to be involved in the treatment in one way or another.
Why SDM? Clinicians
More active involvement of patients in the decision making process improves treatment relationship with better outcomes as a result. Enhanced patient adherence, more satisfsaction and better clinical outcomes.
Possible objections on SDM
- Options may harm those patients who are having difficulties in decision making. Options may result in a growing awareness of missed opportunities.
- Patients may find it difficult to appreciate outcomes because of their inability to foresee how they themselves will adapt to outcomes.
- Choice and having a say raise expectations. Disapointment and dissatisfaction lie ahead when clinical realities fail to meet expectations.
Patients where SDM is more appropriate
For relatively healthy patients (prevention consults)
For patients with active coping abilities
For patients with chronic conditions
Patients where SDM is less appropriate
For elderly patients
For less educated patients
For patients with acute or very severe somatic problems
For patients who have to take minor decisions
For patients with mental health problems
Situations where SDM is especially appropriate
- There is uncertainty regarding effectiveness or outcome
- Risks and benefits are considerable or equal
- The patient is willing and able to participate actively
- The patient is able to comprehend and appreciate trade-offs
What are the obstacles on SDM?
Lack of resources (Time, money)
- Seeing more patients in less time is profitable
- Implementation of SDM is costly
Fear of loss of professional autonomy
Poor communication
- Giving information about risks and possible outcomes can be extremely difficult
Patient needs and expectations
- Belief among doctors that do not wish to be fully informed and have little desire for continuous active participation
- Preferences among patients for active participation do in fact vary
- SDM has to be a choice as well
What are the requirements for SDM?
- Reformed health care system and underlying legislation seem to favor consumerism. Legislation will need to change.
- Willingness to invest in the development of decision aids, self-help, patient support groups, case management
- Attention for SDM in doctors training programs, investment in development of SDM skills, also on the part of patients.
- The will on the part of clinicains to practice SDM whenever possible
What is SDM? (Legáre)
Defines shared decision-making (SDM) as an interpersonal, interdependent process in which the healthcare provider and the patient collaborate to make decisions about the patient’s health. It involves both parties recognizing the need for a decision, understanding the best available evidence, and incorporating the patient’s values and preferences into the decision-making process.
What is SDM? (Gillick)
The patient receives information about available treatment options, including their associated benefits and risks.
The clinicians and the patient then consider these options in light of the patient’s circumstances, goals, and preferences.
Together, they select the best course of action
Interpretative patient choice (Gullick)
This model shifts the focus from choosing specific treatments to articulating broader goals, with physicians helping patients to translate those goals into appropriate medical care.
Who is responsible for the consequences of a medical decision?
If the doctor gave permission to a treatment below the professional standard, the doctor is responsible.
The eight dimensions of PCC
Patient preferences
Information and education
Access to care
Physical comfort
Emotional support
Family and friends
Coordination of care
Continuity and transition
Different levels of barriers in PCC (Kuipers, 2021)
Patient
- Differences in patient needs and health literacy
Organization
- Differences in education, motivation and skills of healthcare professionals/organizations
National
- Restrictive information sharing and a lack of supportive financial structures
Weight stigma
Discrimination or bias towards individuals because of their weight or size
Jayadevappa vs Rathert
The Jayadevappa is more about the global and bigger process of applying an evaluating PCCD. It is more on an organizational level, how to facilitate PCCD and evaluate PCCD.
Rathert model is more on an individual and micro level. It is more about the mechanism of PCCD, how PCCD relate to outcomes.
Four views on evidence-based patient-centered care according to Lacy and Backer, 2008
Either/or
Integrated
Continuum
Cyclical
Either/or
In the either/or model of evidence-based and patient-centered care, each approach was distinct from the other.
Integrated
Group members conceptualized overlapping spheres, creating a band of practice in which the practitioner applies concepts from both spheres.
Continuum
When viewed as a continuum, EBPCC ranged from purely evidence based to purely patient centered. When viewed as a balance, this model suggests a point at which a clinician incorporates both patient centeredness and evidence-based medicine and that the best practice involved balancing the two.
Cyclical
In this model, EBPCC is a process that moves from patient-centered care through evidence-based care and then back to patient-centered care. While the original presentation was as a single cycle, the comments of the larger groups were more consistent with an iterative model.