Payment or Performance Flashcards
Mode of Extinguishing Obligation Part I
payment
means not only the delivery of money but also the performance, in any other manner, of an obligation. (Art. 1232,
NCC.)
May a third person compel the creditor to accept payment or performance of an obligation?
As a general rule, no. However, there are exceptions:
(1) When it is made by a third person who has an interest in the fulfillment of the obligation. (Art. 1236, NCC.)
(2) When there is a stipulation to the contrary. (Art. 1236,
NCC)
In payment, if a third person pays an obligation, what are the rights which are available to him?
There are two (2) rights which are
available to him.
1. he can recover from the debtor the entire amount which he has paid (Art. 1236, par. 2, NCC.);
2. he is subrogated to all of the rights of the creditor. (Art. 1302, No. 2, NCC.) However, if the payment is made without
the knowledge or against the will of the debtor, he can recover only insofar as the payment has been beneficial to the said debtor. (Art. 1236, par. 2,
NCC.)
To whom must payment be made?
Payment shall be made, as a general rule, to:
(1) the person in whose favor the obligation has been constituted, or
(2) his successor in interest, or
(3) any person authorized to received it.
(Art. 1240, NCC.)
Suppose that payment is made to a person other than those stated in Art. 1240 of the NCC, what is the effect?
It shall not be valid. There are, however, two (2) exceptions to this rule. They are:
- payment made to a third person, provided that it has redounded to the benefit of the creditor; and
- payment made to the possessor of the credit, provided that it was made in good faith. (Arts. 1241, par. 2, and 1242, NCC.)
According to the NCC (Art. 1241), payment made to a third person shall be valid insofar as it has redounded to the benefit of the creditor. When is such benefit to the
creditor presumed?
- If after the payment, the third person acquires the creditor’s rights;
- If the creditor ratifies the payment to the third person;
- If by the creditor’s conduct, the debtor has been led to believe that the third person had authority to receive the payment.
(Art. 1241, par. 2, NCC.)
On June 15, 1958, D borrowed P10,000 from C. The debt is evidenced by a promissory note signed by D, as
principal debtor, and by G, as guarantor, by virtue of which it was promised that the entire debt shall be paid on June 15, 1962. When the note matured, P, a third person, paid the entire debt of P10,000 to C. The payment was made with the consent of D. If P proceeds against D for reimbursement of the amount which he paid to C, and D cannot pay by reason of
insolvency, can he now proceed against the guarantor, G? Reason.
If P proceeds against D for reimbursement of the P10,000 which he has paid to C, and D cannot pay by reason of insolvency, he can now proceed against the guarantor, G, for reimbursement.
Under the law, if a third person pays the obligation with the consent or approval of the debtor, he is subrogated to all of the rights of the creditor, not only against the debtor, but even against third persons, such as those arising from a guaranty. (Arts.
1237, 1302, No. 2, NCC.)
Dation in payment (dacion enpago)
Property is alienated to the creditor in satisfaction of a debt in money (Art. 1245 of the NCC)
A special mode of payment, the debtor offers another thing to the creditor who accepts it as equivalent of payment of an outstanding obligation. (Filinvest Credit
Corporation vs. Phil. Acetylene Co., 197 Phil. 394)
In domestic monetary obligations, in what currency shall payment be made?
R.A. No. 8183 which was approved last June 11, 1996 substantially states that:
“Sec. 1. All monetary obligations shall be settled in the Philippine currency which is the legal tender in the Philippines. However, the parties may agree that the obligation or transaction shall be settled in any other currency at the time
of payment.”
What is meant by legal tender?
Refers to such currency which may
be used for the payment of all debts, whether public or private.
(Art. 1249 the NCC, R.A. No. 529 and R.A. No. 4100)
Suppose that in the above problem, payment was made in emergency notes, is the payment valid?
Yes, payment made in emergency notes is valid. This is so because such notes must be considered as legal tender but
only in those places which were under the control of either the Commonwealth or of the guerilla government issuing the notes.
(Phil. National Bank vs. Teves, L-8706, 8813, December 14,1951.)
Can a monetary obligation be paid with promissory note payable to order, or bills of exchange, or other mercantile
documents? Why?
As a general rule, no. Since negotiable papers or mercantile documents, such as promissory notes payable to order or bills of exchange, are not legal tender, it is logical that the delivery of such
papers or documents by the debtor to the creditor shall not produce the effect of payment.
What are the exceptions to the rule of legal tender?
- when the promissory notes payable to order, or bills of exchange or other mercantile documents have been cashed;
2 when through the fault of the creditor they have been impaired.
(Art. 1249, par. 2, NCC.)
In case an extraordinary inflation or deflation of the Philippine currency should supervene, what value will be the basis of payment — will it be the value of the currency at the time of the establishment of the obligation or the value at the time of payment?
The value of the currency at the time of the establishment of the obligation shall be the basis of payment, unless there is a
stipulation to the contrary. (Art. 1250s NCC; Singson vs. Caltex [Inc.], G.R. No. 137798, October 4, 2000.)
What is meant by extraordinary inflation or deflation of the currency? In order that the rule in Art. 1250 of the NCC is applicable, what requisites must be present?
unusual or beyond the common fluctuation in the value of the currency, which the parties could not have reasonably foreseen or which was manifestly beyond their contemplation at
the time when the obligation was established. (4 Tolentino 284 )