Pavlov- experiment with salivation in dogs Flashcards

1
Q

What were the 2 aims?

A
  1. to explain the role of conditioned reflexes in the eating behaviour of dogs
  2. explore how salivation becomes associated with new stimuli unrelated to food and properties of this association
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of experiment was it?

A

Lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the sample?

A

35 dogs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the dependent variable?

A

salivation collected from the salivary glands of immobilised dogs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was production of saliva measured?

A

by volume / drops in a cannula

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where did the experiment take place?

A

In a soundproof chamber

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How was the baseline established?

A

By measuring salivation in response to a NS (metronome/bell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the unconditioned stimulus?

A

food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many times was the NS (bell) paired with the UCS (food)?

A

20 times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How were further variations used to investigate extinction and spontaneous recovery of salivation?

A

The NS (metronome) was now a CS and was presented several times without the UCS which produced extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the forward conditioning?

A

The bell (NS) was presented before the food (UCS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the backward conditioning?

A

Food (UCS) presented after the bell (NS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the results?

A

in 1 session Pavlov recorded that salivation started 9 seconds after the metronome sound and 45 drops were collected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the results of backwards pairing?

A

No salivation found in response to the NS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the 2 conclusions?

A
  1. Signalisation- a link is likely to be made in the brain between a UCS and an NS that occurs just before the UCS
  2. Has survival value in preparing an organism for events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the main problem with the generalisability of the results?
(G.r.a.v.e)

A

Conducted on dogs
Cant really generalise results to humans as humans have structurally different brains from other species and therefore may respond different
Humans have a larger cerebral cortex that other species which permits more complex cognitive processing inducing conscious choice

17
Q

How does the inductive reasoning add reliability?
(G.R.a.v.e)

A

initially observed how the dog’s salivate for the mere sound of bells ringing and then tested this effect in a series of experiments until he arrived at the theory

18
Q

How was the study standardised?
(g.R.a.v.e)

A

NS remained the metronome

19
Q

How did was there high reliability?
(g.R.a.v.e)

A

used highly reliable scientific methods- research was carried out from a lab and standardised procedures were used

20
Q

How can there be clinical applications?
(g.r.A.v.e)

A

in understanding problem-eating behaviours.
Obesity can partially be understood in terms of conditioned responses which were very likely displayed by Pavlov’s dogs

21
Q

What does Anita Jonsen et al (2003) say for clinical applications?
(g.r.A.v.e)

A

Overweight children have acquired very strong associations between cues that predict the arrival of food and the salivation response.
Overeating follows exposure to these cues

22
Q

How did the study have high internal validity?
(g.r.a.V.e)

A

reduced impact of extraneous variables; took place in a sound proof chamber to reduce the possibility of external sound distracting the dogs/ providing additional stimuli

23
Q

How did the method of collecting saliva increase validity?
(g.r.a.V.e)

A

the collection of saliva externally in a cannula helped prevent any loss of saliva

24
Q

How did the study lack ecological validity?
(g.r.a.V.e)

A

controlled lab setting means the research may not be true in naturalist settings
The dogs were kept in unusual conditions in harnesses in a box with drip feeds attached to their mouths and they were presented with odd stimuli

25
How did the study have high internal validity? (g.r.a.V.e)
The dogs are unlikely to show demand characteristics- they're not likely to change their behaviour to fit the aim or try to guess the aim
26
Why is the study considered unethical? (g.r.a.v.E)
wouldn't be conducted today as research on animals should be treated humanely and not sealed up in small rooms tied in harnesses and subjected to surgery
27
How was the study considered ethical in a certain aspect? (g.r.a.v.E)
The study was originally investigating how digestion works. It led to medical and dietary benefits for millions of people (and dogs) which might be said to outweigh the discomfort/stress experienced by the 35 dogs used over 25 years