Patent Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Old 102(a)

A

-can’t get a patent on something someone else probably invented first
-proof accepted by PTO:
~published docs/patents (from anywhere in the world) OR
~the invention was already known/used by others (in US only) before your date of invention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Old 102(b)

A
  • once invention is in the “public domain” by the inventor’s/another’s actions, the inventor has 1 yr grace to file patent
  • if 1 yr grace passes, inventor is barred from filing
  • “public domain” is published docs/patents (from anywhere), or public use/sale (in US only)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Old 102(c)

A

-can’t patent something that you, personally, have publicly stated you have given up on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Old 102(d)

A

-can start the patent process outside the US, but once 1 yr has passed from the foreign filing date, you are at risk of being barred from filing in the US if the foreign patent issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Old 102(e)

A

-can’t patent something someone else invented first (similar to 102(a))
~if proof of prior invention found in a previously filed/issued/published US application that has a US filing date before your date of invention
>also applies to published PCT applications filed on/after 11/29/00 that designate the US and publish in English

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Old 102(f)

A

-can only patent what you invented; can’t patent the work of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Old 102(g)

A

-USPTO will only give one patent for each invention
~if more than one inventor claims the same invention, the PTO will conduct an “interference” to decide who truly invented first + will award to that inventor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
Prior Art
New 102(a)(1)
A

-can’t file a patent application on something that is already provably in the “public domain” before you file
~proof can be patents/printed publications/public use or sale/otherwise in the “public domain” anywhere in the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
Prior Art
New 102(a)(2)
A

-can’t file a patent application on something someone else filed before you filed
~proof of prior filing is ONLY in the form of a previously filed, published, or issued US application w/ the prior art date set as the earliest effective filing date (foreign/domestic) of that patented/published US application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exceptions to Prior Art
>New 102(a)(1)

New 102(b)(1)(A)

A

-a disclosure made by the inventor/person who obtained the disclosure from inventor, w/in 1 yr of the filing date does not constitute prior art

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exceptions to Prior Art
>New 102(a)(1)

New 102(b)(1)(B)

A

-not prior art if the subject matter of a 3rd party’s disclosure, w/in 1 yr of filing, was made public by the inventor/someone who obtained it from the inventor, before the 3rd party disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Exceptions to Prior Art
>Exceptions to 102(a)(2) disclosures in prior-filed published/issued US applications:

New 102(b)(2)(A)

A

-a disclosure in a prior-filed published/issued US application is not prior art if the subject matter was obtained directly/indirectly from the inventor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exceptions to Prior Art
>Exceptions to 102(a)(2) disclosures in prior-filed published/issued US applications:

New 102(b)(2)(B)

A

-similar to new 102(b)(2)(A), subject matter disclosed in the prior, 3rd-party-filed published/issued US application is not prior art if it was first publicly disclosed, before the effective filing date of the 3rd-party, by the inventor/another who had obtained the subject matter directly/indirectly from the inventor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Exceptions to Prior Art
>Exceptions to 102(a)(2) disclosures in prior-filed published/issued US applications:

New 102(b)(2)(C)

A

-not prior art (similar to 102(b)(2)(A) + 102 (b)(2)(B)) if subject matter disclosed, and claimed invention in the prior-filed published/issued US application, were commonly owned/under assignment obligation by the owner of the application currently being examined before the effective filing date thereof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Common Ownership Under a Joint Research Agreement
Joint ownership under a joint research agreement if:

New 102(c)(1), 102(c)(2), + 102(c)(3)

A

102(c)(1)
-the claimed invention was made by parties to the agreement and the agreement was in effect before the effective filing date
102(c)(2)
-the invention resulted from the activities within the scope of the agreement
102(c)(3)
-the application discloses the names of the parties to the agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
Common Ownership Under a Joint Research Agreement
Joint ownership under a joint research agreement if:
New 102(c)(1), 102(c)(2), + 102(c)(3)

New 102(c)(1)

A

-the claimed invention was made by parties to the agreement and the agreement was in effect before the effective filing date
AND
102(c)(2) + 102(c)(3)

17
Q
Common Ownership Under a Joint Research Agreement
Joint ownership under a joint research agreement if:
New 102(c)(1), 102(c)(2), + 102(c)(3)

New 102(c)(2)

A

-the invention resulted from the activities within the scope of the agreement
AND
102(c)(1) + 102(c)(3)

18
Q
Common Ownership Under a Joint Research Agreement
Joint ownership under a joint research agreement if:
New 102(c)(1), 102(c)(2), + 102(c)(3)

New 102(c)(3)

A

-the application discloses the names of the parties to the agreement
AND
102(c)(1) + 102(c)(2)

19
Q

Defining Effective Filing Date of Published/Issued US Applications (New):

A

102(d)(1) UNLESS 102(d)(2)

20
Q

Defining Effective Filing Date of Published/Issued US Applications (New):

102(d)(1) UNLESS 102(d)(2)

A

New 102(d)(1)
-the effective filing date is the actual filing date of the application
UNLESS
New 102(d)(2)
-there is a claim for priority, then the priority date is the effective filing date