Party funding Flashcards

1
Q

List the main ways in which parties are funded

A
  • Collecting membership subscriptions
  • Holding fundraising events
  • Receiving donationns from supporters
  • Raising loans from wealthy individuals or banks
  • The self-financing of candidates for office
  • Grants from the electoral comission (up to £2 million per party)
  • Money granted to opposition parties in the commons or lords
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What % of the Labour party’s income came from trade union donations between 2014-15?

A

60%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what % of Labour’s income came from trade union donations in 2017?

A

11%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why has there been a drop off in the proportion of Labour’s income that is made up by trade union donations?

A

Because the rules for union donations have made it easier for individual union members to opt out of donating to a political party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why are small parties more unlikely to receive donations?

A

Because donors will not want to contribute to a party whose prospects of getting into government are remote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do some people still donate to minor parties?

A

They are acting out of idealism rather than any prospect of actually gaining influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How was the funding of political parties regulated in 2000?

A

Through the political parties, elections and referendums act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

List the stipulations of the 2000 PPER Act

A
  • People not on the UK electoral roll could no longer make donations
  • Limits were placed upon how much could be spent on parliamentary elections
  • Donations over £500 had to be declared
  • Donations over £7500 had to be placed on the electoral register
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the main aim of the 2000 PPER Act?

A

To create greater transparency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How were reguations developed in 2009, following the MP expenses scandal?

A

Through the Political Parties and Elections Act. This gave the Electoral Comission the power to investigate and impose fines, restricted donations from non-UK residents and imposed tighter regulations in the run up to elections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is funding from large donors so controversial?

A

Because it represents a hidden and unaccountable form of political influence, as donors often expect some kind of return on their investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In what ways can donations prove corrupt?

A
  • ## Some donors may expect to receive an honour from party leaders, such as a peerage or knighthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why have parties become even more reliant upon donors?

A

Due to the steady decline in party membership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How much did the Conservatives receive from prominent figures in the financial sector between 2015-2017?

A

£11.3 million

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How much did Unite give to Labour in early 2017?

A

£657,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why have trade union donations to Labour been criticised?

A

Because members are not given a clear enough choice over whether their donations should be spent in this way. Its also said that it has allowed labour to become unduly influenced by trade union leaders

17
Q

What did the 2007 Phillips report conclude about the current state of affairs?

A

That the way UK parties were funded was undemocratic and in need of reform

18
Q

What did the Phillips report propose?

A

Suggested that state party funding based on membership size or vote share would make party politics fairer and more democratic

19
Q

What are the 4 solutions to the issue of party funding?

A
  • Impose restrictions on the size of donations to political parties. To be effective, the cap would have to be relatively low
  • Impose tighter restrictions on how much parties are allowed to spend. This would make large-scale funding futile
  • Restrict donations to individuals
  • Replace all funding with state grants for parties, raised from general taxation
20
Q

In what ways does state funding already exist?

A
  • Grants from the Electoral Commission
  • Policy development grants that can be used to hire advisors on policy
  • Short money is allocated to all opposition parties in the house of commons
  • Cranbone money is given to opposition peers in the lords
21
Q

Define short money

A

Funds given to opposition parties to fund their parliamentary work. The ammount is based upon how many seats and votes the party won at the last election

22
Q

Define cranborne money

A

Funds paid to opposition parties in the lords to help cover the costs of research and administration, allowing them to scrutinise the work of the government

23
Q

Why did UKIP refuse short money in 2015?

A

Because their one MP said it was corrupt and served only to benefit the established parties

24
Q

What is the main arguement against state party funding?

A

Taxpayers are reluctant to see their taxes used for this when attitudes to parties are already at a low ebb

25
Q

What is another popular policy idea aside from state funding?

A

Eliminating the abuses in the system. This would involve transparency, limits on how much businesses and trade unions can donate, as well as breaking any link between donations and honours

26
Q

List the arguements in favour of full state funding

A
  • It would end corrupt donations
  • It would end ‘hidden’ forms of influence
  • It would reduce the large financial advantage enjoyed by the established parties, giving smaller parties the opportunity to make progress
  • Ensuring participation from groups that don’t have easy access to funds would improve democracy
27
Q

List some arguements against full state funding

A
  • Taxpayers might object to funding parties they find disagreeable
  • It would be difficult to know how to distribute funding
  • Parties could lose their independence and become organs of the state
  • It might lead to excessive state regulation of political parties