Partnerships and LLPs Flashcards
What formalities are required for a partnership? What is the definition of a partnership?
None! So long as there is a relationship between (at least 2) persons carrying on a business in common with a view to making profit
I.e. may be unaware that there is a partnership!
Can be st up without intention!
What 2 criteria must be met for a partnership to exist and is it conclusive?
- Evidence of profit/loss sharing - prima facie but losses make more likely
- All individuals take part in decision-making -
Will be determined on the facts!
If loan of money or not being ‘held out’ as partner = unlikely to be a partnership
What are the advantages to using a partnership?
- No formalities (no cost)
- No filing/disclosure requirements (confidentiality)
What does each partner owe another in a partnership?
Duty of good faith i.e. honest/full disclosure, conflict of duty/interest, no unauthorised profit etc.
What is the nature of each partner’s contractual and tortious liability?
- Contractual = partner liable jointly for all debts/obligations of firm incurred whilst they are partner
- Tortious = partner liable joint and severally
Personally liable re contracts binding on the firm (no SLP)
Tortious wider-reaching (logically)
Will a new partner be automatically liable for debts incurred by the partnership before they joined? And will a retiring partner still be liable for debts incurred by partnership whilst they were a partner?
- New partner not automatically liable for debts before they joined
- Retiring partner will continue to be liable
How can a retiring partner be relieved from liability?
Partnership can novate agreement with consent of creditor
Why can a former partner become liable for partnership debts incurred after they have left? What is the exception?
Because a TP can treat all apparent partners of the firm as jointly liable to pay any new debt incurred by the partnership unless TP has been notified of the change
Apparent partners will still be classed as a partner even though they have left the company
What are the 2 ways a TP can be notified of a change?
To avoid an ‘apparent partner’ being liable
- Actual notice - for those who have had actual dealings with partner before departure; or
- Constructive notice - publication in Gazette for those who have not had actual dealings
What notice must be given by former (apparent) partner to TP when the TP did not know them to be a partner before they left?
None - a former partner will not be liable for debts to any TP who did not know them to be a partner before they left
When will a non-partner (i.e. has never been partner) be personally liable on a partnership debt?
If they have held themselves out to be a partner
What 3 elements are required for a non-partner to have held themselves out as a partner?
- Representation to TP to effect that person is a partner
- TP’s action in response (i.e. giving credit to the firm e.g. supplying goods); and
- TP’s state of mind (believing in representation)
Remember - establishing liability incurred by the non-partner, not the liability of the firm!
When will a partnership be bound to a contract made by an agent?
Where all partners happy to enter into contract and have given actual, express or implied authority
Must the agent who bound the firm - which the other partners are now happy with - be a partner?
No - can be a partner or non-partner binding the firm
If agent had no authority to enter contract, but the partners are happy to be bound, will that mean the contract is void?
No - partners can ratify agent’s act and adopt contract
Expressly or just by going ahead with it
What will be applied if the partners are not happy with the agent’s act (binding firm was against partners’ wishes) and which one is used when?
I.e. agent has entered into contract they are unhappy with
- S5 PA 1890 (where agent is a partner)
- Common law rules (where agent is not a partner)
Under s5 PA, when will a partner’s unauthorised act bind the firm?
Act must be for two things
If viewed objectively:
- Act is for carrying on business of kind carried by firm; and
- Act is for carrying on such business in the usual way (i.e. is the kind of contract that partner acting alone would usually make on the firm’s behalf [rather than one expecting all partners to sign individually)
When will an unauthorised act not bind a firm to a contract under s5 PA (in regard to TP’s state of mind)?
Either…
- TP knew partner in question was not authorised; or
- TP did not know/believe that partner was a partner
Will partners have any recourse re a partner who has bound firm without actual authority?
Can be liable for breach of contract
What can be used to protect a TP where the agent who entered into the contract was not a partner and the partners are not happy with the agent’s act?
Common law rules of agency
When will the common law rules of agency apply to mean a non-partner has bound the firm against the partners’ wishes?
If the agent has apparent authority to enter into a contract
When will ‘apparent authority’ arise and what is the consequence?
- Arises where the principal (firm) makes(/permits to be made) a representation to a TP that a person has authority to bind the firm
- Once representation made to and relied upon by TP = principal bound by actions of that person
e.g. if a firm employs somebody under the title ‘marketing manager’ that title confers on that person apparent authority to bind the firm on marketing decisions.
What counts as ‘holding out’ a person to be a partner and what is the effect?
- Holding out someone as a partner = representation made that they are a partner (even when they are not)
- Effect: person held out as partner has apparent authority to bind firm in same way a real partner can
An example of holding out is in relation to an ex-partner, when the firm carries on using old letterhead (including that partner’s name) after they retire.
Summary of when an agent’s unauthorised act will bind the firm
Partner (s5 PA) - binding if…
- Business of kind carried on by firm
- Carried out in usual way (e.g. only one partner has to sign)
Non-partner e.g. old partner (common law rules) - binding if…
- Non partner has apparent authority because of representation given by firm which third party relies on
How are partnerships taxed?
Tax-transparent; the partnership does not pay tax itself (not a distinct legal entity)
- Partnership makes a single tax return of profits which are agreed with HMRC
- Partners also submit own individual tax returns containing income from partnerships + savings, dividends, rental income etc.
Do not have to pay NI! Are essentially self-employed
I.e. partnership makes a single tax return to show how much partnership owes, then each partners pays income tax on the share of their profits
What does each partner in a partnership have to pay?
- Income tax - each partner personally liable for income tax on their share of partnership profits (not liable for the tax on other partners’ share)
- Capital gains tax
How is CGT calculcated for a partnership?
Normal principles - but each partner treated as owning a fractional share of the asset i.e. on disposal: each partner treated as making disposal of their share and will be taxed on this share of any gain (subject to reliefs)
Fractional share based on agreed profit sharing ratio and if none then in accordance with PA
Is the Partnership Act usually used to regulate relationship between parties and debt liabilitiest etc.?
No - is a fall-back - old provisions so partners very likely to want to agree a partnership agreement to govern how partnership should be run
What will a partnership agreement include?
- Commencement and duration
- Partnership name and place of business
- Partnership property
- Capital, profits and losses
- Drawings/salary
- Accounts
- Dissolution of partnership
- Duties, powers and restrictions on partner (work input, authority, decision-making, incoming partners, retirement, non-compete)