Partnership1 Flashcards
Partnerships.
FIVE ISSUE AREAS:
1) GP FORMATION
2) General Partners’ LIABILITIES of to 3Ps !
3) Rights & Liabilities BETWEEN GPs
4) GPship DISSOLUTION
5) OTHER UNincorporated Biz Orgs
*GENERAL PARTNERSHIP (GPship):
DEFIN., PRESUMPTION, & FORMATION +CA:
1) Defin.:*GPship is an ASSOCIATION of 2+ PERSONS [=any entity] WHO CARRY on as Co-OWNERS a biz for PROFIT!!!
2) NO FORMAL AGT is required.
[CA: SOF; filing]
REBUT: No INT b/c no (expr /impl) CONSENT /WAGES /Loan
3)**RECEIPT of PROFITS (!!) is p.f. ev. that a Pship exists.
*Are Ps PERSONALLY liable to 3Ps …+CA?
[In RUPA States:
Partners are SECONDARILY Liable if PS assets are EXHAUSTED [bankrupt].]
PARTNERS are J&S Liable.
EACH PARTNER is PERS. & INDIVIDUALLY liable 4ENTIRE Amount of ANY TORT & CONTRACT Obligation.
Judgm.: Binding on a P IFF pers. SERVED.
CA: CONTRIBUTION: if P pays more than his share of PS Debt.
*Agency Principles apply to PShips: …
[Cf: Auth. of corp. Officers is gov’d by rules of Agency. => O has Power to BIND the Co if he acted w/ Actual or Apparent auth.
CA: O Liable 4 breach of IMPL. WARR. that he acted w/ auth.]
Partners are AGENTS & Principals of the PShip. They may have ACTUAL or *APPARENT AUTH. to BIND the Pship biz. w.r.t. Authorized Ks & TORTs committed by Ps in the SCOPE of CARRYING ON the PS Biz.
**INCOMING GENERAL partner’s liability to 3Ps vs. OUTGOING: +CA:
1) INCOMING GP is NOT liable to 3Ps for PRE-existing debt.
CA: BUT his Contribution (=Capital) may be used to satisfy prior debts.
2) OUTGOING (=Dissociating) GP: REMAINS liable 4PRE-existing & FUTURE Debts. CA: UNTIL
a) C’ors Receive NOTICE of DISSOCIATION or
b) 90d after Filing it w/ SoS.)
LIABILITY of GP to 3P by ESTOPPEL:
One who REPRESENTS to a 3P that a GPship Exists
[thereby inducing 3P’s RELIANCE]
will be PERSONALLY liable as if a PS does exists.
Hypo: Paula convinced her friend Peter to start a sailing school & agreed to lend him money to purchase a boat. At a party, Paula told a wealthy friend: “My partner Peter & I are starting a sailing school & we need a boat.” Wealthy friend offered to sell Paula & Peter a boat & agreed to allow Peter to take it for a test ride the next day. Later that night, however Peter & Paula fight & decide to drop the sailing school idea. Then Peter takes the boat for a ride & tortiously destroys it. May Wealthy friend sue Paula for the loss?
GPs ARE liable for all Pship DEBTS, incl. co-partners’ TORTS.
However Paula & Peter NEVER FORMED a GPship b/c they never agreed to SHARE PROFITS. Rather, it’s a LENDING agt. Nevertheless, under Estoppel, Paula is liable b/c she HELD OUT to Friend that she’s Peter’s partner.
=> Estopped from denying the existence of a PS.
=> Liable for her co-partner’s Tort.
Think: 3 Issues: Formation, Liability, & Estoppel.
PARTNER’S DoL +REMEDY for BREACH:
[Note: To REACH a Partner’s ASSETS:
You need a JUDGMENT against that INDIVIDUAL Partner.]
GPs are FIDUCIARIES of Each Other AND the PS (CA: LP)
=>Ps owe a DoL =must Avoid:
1) SELF-DEALING
2) SECRET Profits &
3) USURPING [/Compete]
REMEDY: Action for ACCOUNTING: PS may recover LOSSES CAUSED by the breach & DISGORGE Profits.
*Specific Pship Assets: Land leases & EQUIP. are:
[ RUPA's SEPARATE Pr. PRES. if: 1) TITLE is NOT in PS Alone, 2) +doesNOT say HOLDER =PS 3) +NO PS FUNDS were used. CA: Else Presume PS Pr. (Cf. If UNtitled Pr: Use CL factors.)]
OWNED Only by the PS =>P mayNOT Transfer Pr to 3P (b/c P is NOT Co-owner) &
**P has NO right to USE Pship Pr for other than the BENEFIT of the PS! (Note: Can’t Recover from BFP).
CA: AUTH’d /PROFITS: ARE indiv. Ps’ pers. Pr.
=>Transferable & Attachable.
SHARE in MGT: Ps canNOT SELL their Partner STATUS (=make 3P a P) w/o UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
When is Property
PS Property vs.
PERSONAL Pr owned by an individual Partner?
1) INTENT of the P is the CONTROLLING Factor.
2) Else, if Pers. FUNDS were USED to buy the Pr, it’s Pers. Pr.
[=1 of RUPA’s separate Pr. PRESUMPTIONs]
Hypo: John buys a car in John’s own name with John’s money which he uses in a PS business. John dies. Does John’s spouse Yoko get the car or is it a specific asset of the partnership?
If bought with personal $$, it is pers. Pr and vice versa.
Here, b/c John bought the car with his funds +there’s no ev. of contrary INT, the car was his Pr, therefore, it is Yoko’s.
General PS: ABSENT AGT to the CONTRARY …(Mgt +VOTING):
[+Each Partner can INSPECT & Copy the PS Books]
+Hypo: A, B and C agree to contribute money & share profits 60-30-10. How do they vote?
each Partner has EQUAL right to Participate in the MGT [vote].
A MAJ. VOTE is req’d to AUTHORIZE ORDINARY PS Biz.
CA: But UNANIMOUS Consent to Authorize EXTRAORDINARY biz matters.
Hypo: Absent AGT on CONTROL: Votes=EQUAL: (1 P=1 vote).
General Partnerships. SALARY: +CA:
+Hypo: A and B are partners. A works 96 hours a week. B sleeps all day. Does A get any salary?
Absent AGT, Partners get NO SALARY.
CA: The ONLY Compensation is for:
WINDING UP the Pships biz.
[HYPO: NO, ONLY profit sharing.]
GPs Share in Profits and Losses: +Hypos:
a) If an AGT states “profits are shared 60/40” but is silent on losses, how are losses shared?
b) If an AGT states “losses are shared 60/40” but is silent on profits, how are profits shared?
c) Partner A puts up all of the money. B does all of the work. C gives the partnership its fine name. D does nothing. How are profits shared?
Absent AGT: 1) PROFITS SHARED EQUALLY
2) LOSSES SHARED LIKE PROFITS.
a) Even if Ps have an AGT on Profits, absent AGT on Losses, losses are shared like profits (60/40).
b) absent AGT on Profits, they are shared EQUALLY.
c) EQUALLY absent a AGT.
Pship DISSOLUTION:
[Cf. LIMITED PS:
If, w/in 90d of a GP’s withdrawal, ALL Remaining Ps AGREE in WRITING, PS CONTINUES.]
PS (at will) AUTOM. DISSOLVES when ONE Partner gives NOTICE of his INTENT (express will) to WITHDRAW.
[+Death /INcapacity].
[CA: Liable for PREMATURE (=w/o MAJ VOTE) w/drawal from a PS for a Defined TERM or Particular UNDERTAKING]