Parties to a Crime - Accomplice Liability Flashcards
Define
Principal
The person who commits the crime
NOTE - the principal must be guilty for the accomplice to be liable - but the principal need not be convicted (he just can’t be acquitted)
Define

Accomplice
a person who assists or encourages the principal with the intent that the crime is committed.
Examples - mere words, supplying a person with materials or supplies, acting as a getaway driver.
NOTE - accomplice also needs the specific intent that the crime be committed.
Michigan Law
Aiding and Abetting
To support a finding that a defendant aided and abetted a crime, the prosecutor must show:
- The crime charged was committed by the defendant or some other person
- The defendant performed acts or gave encouragement that assisted the commission of the crime, and
- The defendant intended the commission of hte crime or had knowledge that the principal intended its commission at the time he gave aid and encouragement
Exclusions from Liability
who is NOT considered an accomplice?

- Necessary Parties - if the statute requires more than one participant in order to complete the crime. ex - adultery, or dueling.
- Victime of a crime (the law is trying to protect them!)
ex - sale of alcohol to minor, statutory rape
Scope of Liability
What can an accomplice be liable for?

a. all crimes that the accomplice aids or encourages, and
b. all “natural and probable results” of the crime that the accomplice intended to assist
Withdrawal
When can an accomplice avoid criminal liability

- Repudiating encouragement if he provided encouragment - “no don’t light the fire”
- Undoing the assistance if he provided aid - get the match back
- Notifying authorities or otherwise prevent the crime from happening
Accessory after the fact
One is an accessory after the fact if he:

- knowingly assists a person who has committed a felony
- with knowledge that a felony has been committed and with
- intent to help the principal avoid arrest, trial, or conviction.
NOTE - thta an accessory after the fact is not liable for the FY itself. He is liable under a theory of obstruction of justice.